It's a busy day on Capitol Hill as House Republicans seek to pass a bill on immigration.
Republicans were set to consider two bills on Thursday: a compromise measure worked out between conservatives and centrists, and a more hard-line alternative.
But the vote on the compromise bill was delayed to Friday as leadership seeks to shore up support.
The more conservative legislation failed on the House floor.
The stakes for the votes have been raised by the controversy surrounding the separation of parents from their children at the border. President TrumpDonald TrumpMcAuliffe takes tougher stance on Democrats in Washington Democrats troll Trump over Virginia governor's race Tom Glavine, Ric Flair, Doug Flutie to join Trump for Herschel Walker event MORE signed an executive order on Wednesday ending those separations but is also calling for legislation.
House postpones vote on compromise bill until next week
House GOP leaders on Thursday evening postponed a vote on a compromise immigration bill until next week so that they can build more support for the legislation.
Leaders announced the move following a two-hour long conference meeting designed to brief members on the measure’s contents.
"We're going to keep working -- there are good ideas being discussed," Majority Whip Steve ScaliseStephen (Steve) Joseph ScaliseHouse GOP campaign arm raises .8 million in third quarter The Hill's 12:30 Report - The Conference of Presidents of Major Italian American Organizations - 90-year-old 'Star Trek' actor describes space visit GOP leader's remarks on Fox underscore Trump's power MORE (R-La.) said. "We're trying to see if we can come to a consensus. So there are still complicated issues we're working through, but we're going to keep trying."
The bill was initially schedule for a vote Thursday, and then was pushed to Friday after members complained that they didn’t have enough time to read and digest the nearly 300-page bill that was rolled out late Tuesday night.
—Melanie Zanona and Juliegrace Brufke
House GOP meets as leaders try to build support for compromise bill
The House GOP is now holding its conference-wide meeting on immigration.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteThe job of shielding journalists is not finished Bottom line No documents? Hoping for legalization? Be wary of Joe Biden MORE (R-Va.), a lead sponsor of the compromise bill now set for a vote Friday, is going through the measure section by section to brief lawmakers on what it actually does.
Lawmakers are being served make-your-own deli sandwiches and chocolate chip cookies.
Gohmert: Leadership 'out of touch with the feelings of the conference'
GOP House leadership didn’t work closely enough with lawmakers on the conservative immigration bill proposed by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), Rep. Louie GohmertLouis (Louie) Buller GohmertHouse passes bill to end crack and powder cocaine sentencing disparity Republicans keep distance from 'Justice for J6' rally Security forces under pressure to prevent repeat of Jan. 6 MORE (R-Texas) said Thursday.
Gohmert, an immigration hardliner who voted against the Goodlatte bill, said he "was close" to supporting it.
"There's a lot of good in the bill," said Gohmert. "If they'd allowed a little more input on the bill, I have no doubt whatsoever it could have and would have passed."
The Goodlatte bill failed 193-231 as leadership postponed until Friday a vote on a more centrist compromise measure.
"They've been telling people, including this morning on Fox, that gee, this compromise bill is going to get so many more votes than the Goodlatte bill," Gohmert said.
"I don't think it's true, I don't think it's ever been true and I think it's another piece of evidence of how out of touch they are with the real feelings of the conference," he added.
Discharge petition supporter says he likely won’t sign a second one
A Republican supporter of the effort to force bipartisan immigration bills to the floor said Thursday that he likely won't endorse another discharge petition, even if both GOP-backed "Dreamer" bills fail this week.
Rep. Chris CollinsChristopher (Chris) Carl CollinsBiden taps Damian Williams as US attorney for Manhattan New York lt. gov. says she is 'prepared to lead' following Cuomo resignation Outrage grows as Justice seeks to contain subpoena fallout MORE (N.Y.), one of 23 Republicans who signed the initial discharge petition put forth by Rep. Carlos CurbeloCarlos Luis CurbeloLawmakers laud diversity gains in Congress Nation's fraught politics leads to fear, scars and exits Direct air capture is a crucial bipartisan climate policy MORE (R-Fla.), said he probably won’t support a similar effort in the future.
"I’m pretty much a lean no,” Collins told The Hill. “I won't say I'm a hard no, but I'm probably a no.”
The loss of Collins’s signature would be a blow to Curbelo and other centrist Republicans vowing to launch a second discharge petition to force votes to salvage the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program if a pair of related, partisan bills fail this week.
The first proposal, sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), was rejected in a 193-231 vote Thursday afternoon. The second bill, a more moderate proposal offering citizenship to Dreamers, is slated for a vote on Friday — a day later than initially scheduled to allow GOP leaders more time to rally support for the measure.
Dem lawmaker: Leadership 'got poked in the eye' by GOP
Rep. Filemon VelaFilemon Bartolome VelaThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Democrats stare down 'hell' week Don't let partisan politics impede Texas' economic recovery WHIP LIST: How House Democrats, Republicans say they'll vote on infrastructure bill MORE (D-Texas) slammed Democratic leadership's immigration strategy Thursday, saying they should not have agreed to work with centrists.
"House Democratic leadership got poked in the eye by the very moderate Republicans they're trying to defeat," said Vela as the House voted down a conservative immigration bill proposed by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.).
House leadership delayed votes on a GOP compromise bill — seen as slightly more moderate than the Goodlatte measure — until Friday.
That bill is also expected to fail, leaving no active legislation dealing with the future of either Dreamers or migrant children separated from their parents at the border.
Vela, who's been known for his opposition to party leadership, said "there's no question" that Republicans were negotiating in bad faith with Democrats.
"We all know where all this is headed and none of it's good for any immigration reform or Dreamers. At this point the Democratic position should be to retract and demand a clean Dream Act like it should've been before they rushed everybody on to that discharge petition."
Hard-line immigration bill fails in the House
The House rejected a hard-line immigration bill introduced by Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) after leadership postponed a second vote on a compromise measure written with centrists.
The vote came a day after President Trump signed an executive order ending his administration's controversial practice of separating migrant children from parents who cross the border illegally.
House leadership had expressed pessimism on the chances for either Goodlatte’s legislation or a second GOP compromise bill written with centrists, both of which were brought to the floor as the growing crisis at the border dominated headlines.
The hard-line measure faced sharp pushback from both Democrats and moderates, who took issue with a number of provisions including its cuts to legal immigration. Both bills have the support of the administration, whose "zero tolerance" policy toward illegal immigration has come under bipartisan fire over the separation of migrant families.
House Republicans delay 4:30 p.m. conference
House Republicans are now scheduled to conference at 4:30 today in the wake of the vote being pushed.
House postpones vote on compromise bill
House Republican leaders are delaying a vote on a compromise immigration bill until Friday.
The delay comes as leadership has struggled to secure 218 votes for the measure, which is the product of weeks of negotiations between centrists and conservatives.
Trump: 'We're all bothered by' by sight of children in detention centers
Trump said Thursday that everybody in his Cabinet is “bothered” by images and stories of migrant children being separated from their parents but continued to blame Democrats for causing the situation.
Trump said at a Cabinet meeting that first lady Melania TrumpMelania TrumpGOP leader's remarks on Fox underscore Trump's power White House orders release of Trump records to Jan. 6 committee Ex-Trump aide sues Grisham over abuse allegations MORE traveled to Texas to tour facilities being used to house some migrant children who had been separated from their family.
“It really bothered her to be looking at this and to be seeing this, as it bothered me, as it bothered everybody at this table. We’re all bothered by it,” Trump said.
Thousands of migrant children have been separated from their parents in recent weeks as a result of the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” policy on illegal immigration.
Senators plan bipartisan meeting on immigration crisis
As the House moves toward votes on a pair of GOP immigration reform bills, across the aisle a new bipartisan Gang of Four plans to meet next week to begin in-depth negotiations on a bill to solve the problem of mass detentions and child separation at the U.S.-Mexico border.
GOP Sens. Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisGOP rallies around Manchin, Sinema Advocates frustrated by shrinking legal migration under Biden Key debt-limit vote sparks major fight among Senate Republicans MORE (N.C.) and Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzThe CDC's Title 42 order fuels racism and undermines public health Ocasio-Cortez goes indoor skydiving for her birthday GOP rallies around Manchin, Sinema MORE (Texas), the original co-sponsors of a Republican measure to keep detained families together at the border, are meeting with Democratic Sens. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinJane Fonda to push for end to offshore oil drilling in California Overnight Health Care — Presented by The National Council on Mental Wellbeing — Merck asks FDA to authorize five-day COVID-19 treatment Bannon's subpoena snub sets up big decision for Biden DOJ MORE (Calif.) and Dick DurbinDick DurbinFill the Eastern District of Virginia Senators preview bill to stop tech giants from prioritizing their own products Democrats struggle to gain steam on Biden spending plan MORE (Ill.) next week to lay the groundwork for a compromise.
“It’s really to bridge the gap,” Tillis said Thursday of the meeting’s purpose. “We need to go through what-if scenarios so that we can address the legitimate concerns of two- or three-year detentions if the courts get clogged up."
Ryan: Votes a 'legitimate exercise' even if they fail
Regardless whether two immigration bills pass or fail, the votes will have been a “legitimate exercise,” Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanJuan Williams: Pelosi shows her power Cheney takes shot at Trump: 'I like Republican presidents who win re-election' Cheney allies flock to her defense against Trump challenge MORE (R-Wis.) told reporters Thursday.
The Wisconsin Republican argued that he views the pair of votes as a success because they avert a discharge petition effort by moderate GOP insurgents and Democrats, and allows Republicans to vote on immigration legislation backed by President Trump.
The push for the petition was an “exercise in futility,” Ryan argued, because it would have handed control of the floor to House Minority Leader Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiDemocrats step up pressure on Biden on student loan forgiveness Climate activists target Manchin Democrats face growing storm over IRS reporting provision MORE (D-Calif.) and other Democrats.
“Our goal was to prevent a discharge petition from reaching the floor, because a discharge petition would have brought legislation to the floor that the president would have surely vetoed. It would have been an exercise in futility,” Ryan said at his weekly press briefing.
“The bills that are coming to the floor today are bills that, if it got to his desk, [Trump] would sign into law. Therefore, it's a legitimate exercise,” he said.
Many GOP lawmakers and some White House officials are predicting that both immigration bills — a compromise bill negotiated between centrist and conservative Republicans, as well as a more hard-line immigration bill called Goodlatte/McCaul — will be rejected on the floor Thursday afternoon.
If that happens, Ryan wouldn’t say whether the House would take up narrower, stand-alone legislation that only deals with the family separations issue that has dominated headlines in recent days.
“We will cross that bridge if we get to it,” Ryan said.
Eleventh hour meeting called in Ryan's office
House leadership has called a last-minute meeting in Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) office ahead of Thursday votes on a pair of GOP immigration bills that are both expected to fail.
A GOP source tells The Hill that the meeting, set for the next hour, comes as multiple Republican lawmakers are seeking to push a vote on an immigration measure to next week.
House votes to proceed to debate on hard-line measure
The House voted 226-185 to proceed to debate on the hard-line immigration bill introduced by Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.).
A final vote on the measure is expected to take place shortly after 5 p.m.
An unexpected meeting on immigration is set to take place in Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-Wis.) office ahead of the final vote, according to a GOP source. A number of Republicans are advocating the vote on the compromise bill be pushed back to next week.
Pelosi calls GOP immigration bill 'a compromise with the devil'
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) charged Republicans with promoting cruelty to children at the border, characterizing the GOP’s compromise immigration bill as a deal with the devil.
Pelosi highlighted the partisan nature of the debate, saying she’s had no conversations with Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) about a legislative solution to the separation of families at the southern border with Mexico.
“They have not ever been interested [in bipartisanship],” Pelosi said during her weekly press briefing in the Capitol.
“They talk, and sometimes you all repeat it, that it’s a compromise. But it is not a compromise. It may be a compromise with the devil, but it’s not a compromise with the Democrats,” she said.
Pelosi said Democrats are not satisfied by Trump's executive order to end family separations saying the order “seeks to replace one form of child abuse with another.”
“Whether they’re incarcerated with their parents or not, they should not be incarcerated,” Pelosi said. “They’re children.”
— Mike Lillis
Melania visits immigrant children at Texas border
First lady Melania Trump traveled to Texas to visit immigrant children in detention facilities.
The president made the announcement about the first lady's visit during a Cabinet meeting at the White House.
Melania Trump’s office later said in a statement she made the trip to “take part in briefings and tours” at a facility run by a nonprofit.
— Jordan Fabian
House committee votes down measure barring family separations
The House Budget Committee rejected an amendment that would bar the Department of Homeland Security from using funds to separate families detained after crossing the border illegally.
The Democratic amendment failed by a 16-9 vote along party lines.
“Children are being ripped from their parents' arms along our southern border,” said Rep. Michelle Lujan GrishamMichelle Lynn Lujan GrishamDemocrats lean into vaccine mandates ahead of midterms Hochul makes New York the 31st state to have had a female governor New Mexico indoor mask mandate returns with new vaccine requirements MORE (D-N.M.), the amendment’s sponsor and the chairwoman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
“Not one penny of taxpayer dollars should ever be used to inflict pain and suffering on a child in order to punish their parents and push a political agenda,” she added.
Committee Chairman Steve WomackStephen (Steve) Allen WomackArkansas legislature splits Little Rock in move that guarantees GOP seats Funding fight imperils National Guard ops Overnight Defense: 6B Pentagon spending bill advances | Navy secretary nominee glides through hearing | Obstacles mount in Capitol security funding fight MORE (R-Ark.) said that while the amendment raised “serious concerns about immigration policy in our country,” such policy should not be taken up in the budget document.
“This amendment does not address the federal budget in a meaningful way. Rather, it seeks to change immigration policy, which is more appropriate for the committees of jurisdiction, Judiciary and Homeland Security, and for a debate on the House floor,” he said before urging a “no” vote.
— Niv Elis
Dem lawmaker: Republicans don't have the votes for either bill
Retiring GOP rep: Trump tweet undermines efforts to get undecided Republicans to support compromise bill
Centrist Rep. Ryan CostelloRyan Anthony CostellloRep. Brendan Boyle decides against Pennsylvania Senate bid Pennsylvania's Democratic lt. governor files to run for Senate Bottom Line MORE (R-Pa.), who is retiring, said on Thursday that a tweet from President Trump will undermine efforts to get wavering Republicans on board with the compromise immigration plan.
"Wow, this undermines getting undecided GOP members to support the compromise bill," Costello tweeted.
Trump in a tweet earlier Thursday renewed his call to end the filibuster in the Senate, venting his frustration that his immigration agenda has hit a stalemate on Capitol Hill.
Wow, this undermines getting undecided GOP members to support the compromise bill. https://t.co/gi1Tpi2OEA— Ryan Costello (@RyanCostello) June 21, 2018
— The Hill staff
Meadows is not optimistic
“I’m not optimistic about the two bills that will be on the floor today,” Meadows said Thursday in an interview with Hill.TV's "Rising." “I think at this point the more conservative bill doesn’t get to 218. It’s still up in the air whether the more moderate bill gets to 218.”
“If I were to have to handicap it right now at this particular point this morning,” he added, “I would say no, it’s not.”
— Melanie Zanona