Dems struggle with unity amid leadership tensions

Dems struggle with unity amid leadership tensions
© Greg Nash

House Democrats are struggling to show a united front as the shocking ouster of their Caucus chairman rekindles tensions about the future of the party — and who is best suited to lead it into the crucial 2020 cycle.

Energized by the constant turmoil surrounding the Trump administration, Democrats of all stripes are bullish about their chances of flipping the House in this year's midterm elections. And the last thing they want is a nasty internal leadership fight heading into November. 

Yet last month's stunning primary defeat of Rep. Joseph Crowley (N.Y.), the Democratic chairman, to a young liberal activist with no political experience, has created an unexpected void in the higher ranks of the party; injected new life into the longstanding campaign for fresher faces at the leadership table; and sparked a renewed interest in insurgent challenges to the current party brass.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was a shock to everyone,” said Rep. John YarmuthJohn Allen YarmuthOvernight Defense: Erdoğan gets earful from GOP senators | Amazon to challenge Pentagon cloud contract decision in court | Lawmakers under pressure to pass benefits fix for military families Lawmakers under pressure to pass benefits fix for military families Kentucky Democrat: McConnell's agenda driven by 'power without a purpose' MORE (D-Ky.), “and that shock lasted about three or four minutes before everyone started plotting.”

The shake-up has transcended thoughts of merely replacing Crowley as Caucus chairman, as some Democrats are now weighing runs at the very top of the party, where Reps. Nancy PelosiNancy Pelosi 'Don't mess with Mama': Pelosi's daughter tweets support following press conference comments Bloomberg: Trump should be impeached On The Money: Congress races to beat deadline on shutdown | Trump asks Supreme Court to shield financial records from House Democrats | House passes bill to explicitly ban insider trading MORE (Calif.), Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerOvernight Health Care: House to vote next week on drug prices bill | Conway says Trump trying to find 'balance' on youth vaping | US spent trillion on hospitals in 2018 House to vote next week on sweeping bill to lower drug prices Congress races to beat deadline on shutdown MORE (Md.) and James Clyburn (S.C.) have reigned for a dozen years.

Rep. Tim RyanTimothy (Tim) RyanGM among partners planning .3B battery plant in Ohio San Francisco 49ers suspend announcer after reference to quarterback's 'dark skin' More than 100 Democrats sign letter calling for Stephen Miller to resign MORE (D-Ohio), who challenged Pelosi unsuccessfully after the 2016 elections, had previously ruled out another attempt this year. With Crowley’s loss, he’s now rethinking his options.

“I got a lot of calls from members, I got a lot of calls from activists … and donors from around the country. So I think there’s some interest in re-evaluating things at this point,” Ryan told The Hill, without committing to a challenge. “It’s certainly got everybody talking, because a lot of people were of the mindset that Joe was going to be the person moving forward that had a lot of support in the Caucus.

“Now that’s all being shook up.”

Highlighting the discontent among some newer Democrats, Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), the vice chairman of the Caucus, is amplifying her previous calls for an overhaul of the top three leaders next year, citing a desire for younger lawmakers with fresh ideas to take the reins of the party.

“I think it’s time for that generational change,” Sánchez told reporters Wednesday on Capitol Hill. 

Sánchez, 49, declined to say whether she’ll seek to replace Crowley as Caucus chairman, but made clear she’s hoping to climb up the leadership ladder whenever the opportunity arises. 

“Whether there’s transition or not [next year] remains to be seen,” she said. “I want to be part of that transition, because I don’t intend to stay in Congress until I’m in my 70s.”

The comments prompted an immediate repudiation from the office of the 78-year-old Pelosi, which issued a one-sentence statement warning that internal divisions will only hurt the Democrats at the polls in November.

“House Democrats are focused on winning in November and if you are rowing in the opposite direction, you are only helping Republicans,” Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said in an email.

The back-and-forth is exactly the type of internal sniping that Democrats are scrambling to avoid heading into the elections, and most Democrats are being highly cautious in their approach to the leadership question. Democrats should focus first on winning back the House in November, these voices argue, and dive into the leadership debate after the dust has cleared.

“With Crowley being gone, it creates a vacuum and people are going to move to fill it,” said Rep. Peter WelchPeter Francis WelchProviding more information on the prescription drug supply chain will help lower costs for all Impeachment hearing breaks into laughter after Democrat contrasts it to Hallmark movie Diplomat ties Trump closer to Ukraine furor MORE (D-Vt.). “[But] in my view, we should spend a lot less time in the next several months focusing on the leadership speculation.”

Rep. Gerry ConnollyGerald (Gerry) Edward ConnollyDemocrats debate scope of impeachment charges House Democrats rebuke State Department for 'reversal' on Israeli settlements Maloney wins House Oversight gavel MORE (D-Va.) echoed that message, saying the leadership debate has been limited to “subterranean conversations” for that very reason.

“Those conversations are muted, largely because most of my colleagues in the caucus really are focused on the main thing, which is not the leadership race, it is ensuring that we win the majority,” he said. 

“If we win the majority, everything’s on the table.” 

For all the talk of Crowley’s defeat, it’s done nothing to alter the most significant — and unknowable — factor likely to dictate the Democrats’ leadership team next year: namely, the outcome of November’s midterms. 

In conversations with more than a dozen Democratic lawmakers and aides, the common sentiment is that Pelosi’s future in Congress will depend on whether she can steer the Democrats into the majority, as she did in 2006 — and by how many seats. Clyburn, for one, has already asserted that a failure to win back the gavel after eight years in the minority wilderness would mean he, Pelosi and Hoyer should all step aside. 

“It all still hinges on Pelosi. If she stays, everybody stays. If she’s got to go, I think most people think everybody’s got to go,” said a Democratic aide. “In that respect nothing’s changed.”

Aside from Sánchez and Ryan, Rep. Barbara LeeBarbara Jean LeeAdam Schiff's star rises with impeachment hearings Lawmakers visit African migrants at US-Mexico border Hillicon Valley: FCC moves against Huawei, ZTE | Dem groups ask Google to reconsider ads policy | Bill introduced to increase data access during probes MORE (D-Calif.) is also exploring a run at leadership next year. Lee, 71, a former head of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC), had lost a narrow contest to Sánchez for vice chairman and now has her eyes on Crowley’s spot. 

For openly discussing her intentions, Lee is an anomaly among the Democrats. Yet numerous sources said the absence of public debate is no indication that lawmakers aren’t working the phones behind the scenes to position themselves for a leadership run, just in case the opportunity emerges.  

“I would assume that anybody from Linda Sánchez down on the leadership rung, … if they’re not making calls now, are thinking about how to proceed pretty quickly here,” said the Democratic aide.