Democrats see hypocrisy in GOP attacks on ‘liberal mob’

Democrats see hypocrisy in GOP attacks on ‘liberal mob’
© Stefani Reynolds

Democrats urged voters not to hand over power to an angry Tea Party mob in 2010, when the Obama White House and then-Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy Patricia D'Alesandro PelosiFreedom Caucus calls on leadership to include wall funding, end to 'catch and release' in funding bill Black Caucus huddles as talk of term limits heats up Insurgent Dems amplify push for term limits on party leaders MORE (D-Calif.) sought to hold on to the House majority.

Eight years later, the tables have been turned, and it is President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Memo: Ayers decision casts harsh light on Trump NASA offers to show Stephen Curry evidence from moon landings Freedom Caucus calls on leadership to include wall funding, end to 'catch and release' in funding bill MORE and a GOP Congress who are warning voters against putting a radical, left-wing mob in charge of Washington.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Democratic arguments in 2010 failed, at least as measured by the ballot box. Republicans gained 63 seats and took back the House majority.

Republicans, however, think their arguments will succeed this time around given the tactics of the so-called resistance to Trump, which has included heated confrontations with senators and administration officials in restaurants, airports and the hallways of the Capitol.

“The extremism on the left displayed by these out-of-control actions shows the agenda that has captured the Democratic Party,” said Rep. Tom ReedThomas (Tom) W. ReedIncoming Dem lawmaker announces more new members support Pelosi Rising Dem star to back Pelosi: 'You can't beat someone with no one' Dems play ‘Let’s make a deal’ with Nancy Pelosi MORE (R-N.Y.), who has faced angry crowds at town halls in his western New York district. “As I have been a voice of the Problem Solvers Caucus in Congress, I still believe the silent majority of Americans want us to stand up to this extremism.”

Democrats think the GOP’s tactics could just further alienate the segment of the electorate that it already appears to be losing: independent and moderate female voters in the suburbs.

“Referring to women’s anger over the Kavanaugh nomination as ‘lethal’... and describing political opponents and huge pockets of the electorate as the ‘mob’ is really inciting something ugly,” Rep. Gerry ConnollyGerald (Gerry) Edward Connolly GOP, Dems locked in fight over North Carolina fraud probe NC voter: Someone collected my absentee ballot and never turned it in Over a thousand absentee ballots possibly destroyed in controversial North Carolina House race: report MORE (D-Va.) told The Hill. “And I think it will backfire.”

Democratic and independent women were already furious with Trump and fired up in the wake of the “Me Too” movement, but the emotional and heated debate over Supreme Court Justice Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughOvernight Health Care — Sponsored by Amgen — Supreme Court sides with Planned Parenthood, declines to take funding case | NIH to fund research into fetal tissue alternatives | Oklahoma seeks Trump approval for Medicaid work requirements Time fumbles another 'Person of the Year' by excluding Kavanaugh Trump, Mueller both make Time 'Person of the Year' shortlist MORE has only further inflamed the tensions.

Hundreds of people were arrested for protesting Kavanaugh’s nomination in Senate office buildings last week, and death threats have been directed at Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who during his confirmation process publicly accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, as well as at senators from both sides of the aisle.

Demonstrators who confronted Sen. Jeff FlakeJeffrey (Jeff) Lane FlakeFlake: Republican Party ‘is a frog slowly boiling in water’ Tim Scott: Stop giving court picks with 'questionable track records on race' a Senate vote Flake stands firm on sending a ‘message to the White House’ on Mueller MORE (R-Ariz.) in an elevator were partly credited with his decision to push for a supplemental FBI background investigation into the nominee.

Similar acts of protest unfolded in 2010, during the rise of the conservative Tea Party movement that sprang up in response to Obama’s presidency and the Affordable Care Act.

Democratic town halls all around the country turned rowdy as Tea Party protesters shouted down lawmakers and expressed anger over ObamaCare.

Nearly 1 million conservatives marched to the Capitol building armed with signs and derogatory chants about the “parasite in chief,” while a number of Democrats received violent threats and harassment, including a picture of a noose being faxed to Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) and a brick being thrown through the window of the district office of the late Rep. Louise SlaughterDorothy (Louise) Louise SlaughterNew York New Members 2019 Democrats see hypocrisy in GOP attacks on ‘liberal mob’ Poll: Dem leads by 24 points in race to replace Louise Slaughter MORE (D-N.Y.).

Democrats say it’s hypocritical for the GOP to now decry the liberal “mob” when conservatives engaged in such heated protests in 2010.

“I was there then, and I remember Republicans going out to the balcony of the Capitol and egging on groups of angry protesters, some of whom were chanting racial epithets,” Connolly said.

“So to turn around and call someone else a mob, when they actually incited people to engage in some pretty vile behavior, gives a whole new meaning to chutzpah.”

Strategists in both parties say fear and anger are some of the strongest motivating factors in the midterm elections.

“People don’t go to the polls to say thanks,” said GOP strategist Liz Mair.

Republicans say the Supreme Court battle has galvanized and united their party for the first time this election cycle. But there is some concern in GOP circles that the energy may not last another four weeks, especially now that Kavanaugh is already on the bench.

“Now that they’ve got Kavanaugh on the court, the Republican outrage may settle down,” said Democratic strategist Brad Bannon.

In an effort to keep their base engaged, Republicans have been stoking fear that the “mob” is coming for other parts of the Republican agenda and the Trump presidency if Democrats win back control of Congress.

Hours before the Kavanaugh vote Saturday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellCornyn opens door to including criminal justice bill in government funding measure The Hill's Morning Report — Trump shakes up staff with eye on 2020, Mueller probe Judd Gregg: The government goes geriatric MORE (R-Ky.) said the anti-Kavanaugh “mob” that harassed senators in the Capitol hallways and elevators and in public had energized GOP voters.

On Tuesday, McConnell again repeatedly invoked “the mob.”

Sharing a new campaign ad this week, conservative Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) tweeted that his Democratic opponent, Abigail Spanberger, was part of the “liberal mob” that attacked him at a recent town hall. The minutelong ad portrays Spanberger sitting in the first row, saying she did not want individual and corporate tax cuts and backed tax hikes to pay for more programs.

It was hardly an angry mob. Spanberger and others were seated as Brat posed questions to the audience from the stage in Chestfield, Va.

But in a follow-up interview, Brat said Democrats this cycle have attacked him with “vulgar language” and alleged that the Spanberger campaign left a flyer at his house while his kid was home alone that read: “Rot in hell, Dave.”  

He also says he saw people looking through his home window and taking photographs of his cars and property.

“You will not find any of this coming from the conservative right now,” Brat told The Hill. “The left is out of control, and I think the average American is picking up on this.”

Democrats, however, say Republicans are just trying to weaponize the raw, emotional responses to the bitter confirmation process.

“The national outpouring of support for Dr. Ford shouldn’t be confused for anything else,” said a spokesman for Pelosi. “We have seen an unprecedented mobilization of women coming forward, many with their own stories speaking truth to power.”

But Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulLimited Senate access to CIA intelligence is not conspiracy Dems have new moniker for Trump: ‘Unindicted co-conspirator' Rand Paul downplays potential Trump campaign finance violations: 'We’ve over-criminalized campaign finance' MORE (R-Ky.) argued that Republicans are not just stoking fear about mob violence for political gain.

He has experienced such violence firsthand over the past 18 months, when a gunman opened fire on Republicans practicing for a charity baseball game in the summer of 2017 and again when a neighbor attacked him and broke six of his ribs. 

His wife, Kelley Paul, wrote in an op-ed that she now sleeps with a loaded gun next to her bed.

“I really worry that someone is going to be killed and that those who are ratcheting up the conversation ... they have to realize that they bear some responsibility if this elevates to violence,” Rand Paul told a local radio station Tuesday.

“I think what people need to realize, that when people like [Sen.] Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerBooker's potential 2020 bid is generating buzz among Democratic activists, says political reporter The Hill's Morning Report — Trump shakes up staff with eye on 2020, Mueller probe O’Rourke is fireball, but not all Dems are sold MORE say ‘get up in their face,’ he may think that that’s OK,” Paul added. “But what he doesn’t realize is that for about every thousandth person that might want to get up in your face, one of them is going to be unstable enough to commit violence.”