SPONSORED:

Democrats seize on Mueller-Barr friction

Democrats seized Thursday on two explosive stories that members of Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerWhy a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel CNN's Toobin warns McCabe is in 'perilous condition' with emboldened Trump MORE’s team are frustrated with Attorney General William BarrBill BarrActing attorney general condemns Capitol riots, warns 'no tolerance' for violence at Biden inauguration Barr, White House counsel told Trump not to self-pardon: report Trump condemns riots, says he will focus on transition in taped remarks MORE’s summary of his findings, intensifying their calls for the special counsel’s full report to be released.

The remarks from Democrats showed they think their hand in demanding the full release of Mueller’s report has been strengthened by the reports.

ADVERTISEMENT

“These latest developments … just show additionally why it is imperative that the entire report and the underlying documents be released to the House immediately,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerPelosi names 9 impeachment managers Republicans gauge support for Trump impeachment Clyburn blasts DeVos and Chao for 'running away' from 25th Amendment fight MORE (D-N.Y.) told reporters Thursday.

Nadler amplified a promise he made Wednesday to issue a subpoena for the report and its underlying evidence authorized by his panel in “very short order” if the Justice Department does not comply with its demands. 

Hours later, Nadler delivered a letter to Barr, demanding that the attorney general release the public "summaries" that, according to the new media reports, had been prepared by the special counsel — and kept under wraps by the Justice Department. 

House Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTrump seeks to freeze .4 billion of programs in final week of presidency Dozens on FBI's terrorist watchlist were in DC day of Capitol riot Porter loses seat on House panel overseeing financial sector MORE (D-Calif.) also used the reports as an opportunity to push for the release of Mueller's closing documentation. 

“There is an easy answer to this: release the Mueller report as soon as possible,” Pelosi said at a news conference Thursday in response to questions about stories in The New York Times and The Washington Post.

The Justice Department defended Barr’s decision to offer just a four-page summary of Mueller’s findings so far in response to the reports, saying it was necessary to go through the hundreds of pages carefully to do redactions for grand jury material prohibited from release.

“Given the extraordinary public interest in the matter, the Attorney General decided to release the report’s bottom-line findings and his conclusions immediately — without attempting to summarize the report — with the understanding that the report itself would be released after the redactions process,” Justice Department spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said in a statement.

The Justice Department also emphasized Barr’s commitment to releasing as much of the report publicly as possible. Barr has said he plans to release a version to Congress and the public by mid-April with redactions for grand jury material, classified information, details impacting ongoing investigations and “information that would unduly infringe on the personal privacy and reputational interests of peripheral third parties.”

President TrumpDonald TrumpEx-Trump lawyer Cohen to pen forward for impeachment book Murkowski says it would be 'appropriate' to bar Trump from holding office again Man known as 'QAnon Shaman' asks Trump for pardon after storming Capitol MORE and his allies launched attacks on the media and Mueller’s team.

“The New York Times had no legitimate sources, which would be totally illegal, concerning the Mueller Report. In fact, they probably had no sources at all! They are a Fake News paper who have already been forced to apologize for their incorrect and very bad reporting on me!” the president wrote in a tweet.

The Times was quick to come back with a response: “False. Our reporters interviewed multiple government officials and others to gather the facts for the story,” it said in a statement.

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer, lashed out at Mueller's team, saying on Fox News’s “The Ingraham Angle” that they were “a bunch of sneaky, unethical leakers.”

The Times reported that members of Mueller’s team have said privately that Barr’s distillation of their report conveyed a more rosy picture of the president’s behavior than they had found.

The Washington Post reported that some of Mueller’s investigators have expressed frustration that Barr’s memo did not properly portray the evidence gathered that led Barr to conclude no charge for obstruction of justice should be made against the president. One person complained to the Post that the evidence was “much more acute” than the attorney general suggested.

Distrust with Barr among Democrats runs high, largely because of a 19-page memo he wrote last year while in private practice arguing that Trump could not be charged with obstruction in the firing of former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyComey: Biden should consider pardoning Trump Comey: 'Greatest punishment' for Trump after Capitol riot is to 'move past' his presidency Comey argues Trump shouldn't be prosecuted after leaving Oval Office MORE. Barr wrote that the president has the clear power to choose the members of his own administration.

Democrats have repeatedly pointed to that memo as evidence that Barr is more interested in protecting Trump than serving as a neutral legal referee.

“I mean, it has the unmistakable whiff of a PR operation from top to bottom, which is why we’ve been saying from the very beginning there is no substitute for the report itself, Congress has the power and the right to receive this report,” said Rep. Jamie RaskinJamin (Jamie) Ben RaskinHouse impeaches Trump for second time — with some GOP support Washington state rep joins list of Republicans voting to impeach Trump The Hill's Morning Report - How many Republicans will vote for Trump's impeachment? MORE (D-Md.).

Nadler has been coy about whether or when he would actually issue a subpoena, which would trigger a court fight with the administration.

“I think the issue with the subpoena is based on giving Barr time to comply,” Rep. Steve CohenStephen (Steve) Ira CohenHouse Judiciary Democrats ask Pence to invoke 25th Amendment to remove Trump Stopping the abuse of the pardon power De Blasio mum on whether he'll block sale of Mets to controversial investor MORE (D-Tenn.) told The Hill. “Barr is not going to comply and we're going to end up going to court.”

Republicans have downplayed the reports that some on Mueller’s team are unhappy with the Barr summary.

“You have 20 agents and almost 40 lawyers. I’d be shocked if they all were of unanimous opinion,” former House Oversight and Reform Committee Chairman Trey GowdyTrey GowdyThe Hunter Biden problem won't go away Sunday shows preview: Joe Biden wins the 2020 election Sunday shows preview: Election integrity dominates as Nov. 3 nears MORE (R-S.C.) told Fox News Wednesday night.

Gowdy also says he doubts Barr will even produce everything that Democrats are demanding.

“I’ll be surprised if Barr ever produces everything, and they can go to court, but they will lose in court. What you saw today was for public consumption. It is a communications war, it is not a constitutional war,” he said.

While Republicans have said they’re in favor of the report’s release, they have also accused Democrats of using the subpoena threat in an effort undermine the president and his administration after Mueller’s findings left them disappointed.

The drama over the subpoena is likely to build in the next week with the House approaching an 18-day spring recess. If Democrats don’t get the report by then, they are sure to be unhappy.

Pelosi on Thursday voiced confidence.

“And let me just say: the Mueller report will be released. It’s just a question of — to us, it is inevitable; to them, it is inconceivable. We have to shorten the distance between the inevitable and the inconceivable,” she said.

“I think they should release the report. That’s where the evidence is, the information is. Let’s see the report,” she added. “If they don’t have anything to hide, they shouldn’t worry.”