GOP presses Trump to make a deal on spending

Congressional leaders face an uphill battle in selling President TrumpDonald John TrumpZuckerberg launches public defense of Facebook as attacks mount Trump leaning toward keeping a couple hundred troops in eastern Syria: report Warren says making Israel aid conditional on settlement building is 'on the table' MORE on a two-year spending deal when they meet with his top advisers at a meeting scheduled in the Capitol on Tuesday.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiTurkey sanctions face possible wall in GOP Senate Trump lashes out at Pelosi as she visits Jordan to discuss Syria Thomas D'Alesandro III, brother of Nancy Pelosi, dies at 90 MORE (D-Calif.), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTurkey sanctions face possible wall in GOP Senate Fox's Wallace says 'well-connected' Republican told him there's a 20 percent chance GOP will vote for impeachment White House staggers after tumultuous 48 hours MORE (R-Ky.), Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTurkey says soldier killed despite cease-fire in Syria Schumer calls for FDA to probe reports of contaminated baby food How Trump and Pelosi went from bad to worse MORE (D-N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyTurkey sanctions face possible wall in GOP Senate How Trump and Pelosi went from bad to worse House Republicans 'demand the release of the rules' on impeachment MORE (R-Calif.) hope to break the budget stalemate when they meet in Pelosi’s office at 10:30 a.m.

McConnell and McCarthy are eager to strike a deal to avoid the prospect of another government shutdown, even if it means giving Democrats an increase in domestic nondefense spending, which most Republicans would otherwise oppose.

“It’s better politically, but it’s bad for the responsibilities we have of fiscal conservativism,” Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyState cites 38 people for violations in Clinton email review Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle mourn Cummings GOP cautions Graham against hauling Biden before Senate MORE (Iowa), the Senate’s most senior Republican, said of a two-year spending caps deal, which Pelosi, Schumer, McConnell and McCarthy hope to iron out.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grassley explained the political benefit would be to eliminate the danger of another lengthy government shutdown like the one that shuttered federal agencies for 35 days earlier this year. Asked why a two-year deal is better politically, Grassley responded, “So we don’t shut down the government and you don’t have a continuing resolution that Pelosi is going to have go through [the House] every three months just to remind the people that Republicans can’t govern.”

Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinTop economic adviser warned Trump on reelection chances ahead of China truce: report The Hill's Morning Report - Tempers boil over at the White House Schumer seeks focus on health care amid impeachment fever MORE, White House acting chief of staff Mick MulvaneyJohn (Mick) Michael MulvaneyWhite House officials work to tamp down controversies after a tumultuous week Sunday shows — Mulvaney seeks to tamp down firestorm over quid pro quo comments, Doral decision Mulvaney says he thinks Trump knows people thought Doral decision looked 'lousy' MORE and acting White House budget director Russell Vought will represent Trump’s position and enter the meeting skeptical of a two-year deal that will draw criticism from the GOP’s conservative base. They will push for sticking to the 2020 spending caps set by the 2011 Budget Control Act, which would effectively cut spending compared to 2019 levels, or for a one-year spending deal, which would cause less sticker shock than a two-year agreement, according to sources familiar with the White House position.

In an interview with The Hill last month, White House economic adviser Larry KudlowLawrence (Larry) Alan KudlowMORE said, “The president has indicated, if the spending caps going all the way back to the 2011 deal are not met, then we will sequester across the board, both defense and nondefense, excluding entitlements, but we will run by those rules. That’s tough stuff. I think that’s appropriate.” 

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbySenate GOP braces for impeachment trial 'roller coaster' McConnell tees up government funding votes amid stalemate GOP warns Graham letter to Pelosi on impeachment could 'backfire' MORE (R-Ala.) met with Trump, Mnuchin, Mulvaney and Vought Monday afternoon to make an appeal for not letting the automatic cuts known as sequestration take effect. 

He warned that it would result in a “draconian” cut in defense programs and “send the wrong message to our adversaries around the world.” 

Shelby said it appeared Trump heard and was receptive to his message but didn’t know if that made him more likely to accept a two-year bipartisan spending deal. 

Conservative strategists who favor reduced spending argue that White House officials shouldn’t take any two-year deal proposed by congressional leaders on Tuesday.

“No deal is a good deal because if the caps kick in then you actually have cuts to spending,” said Brian Darling, a GOP strategist and former Senate aide.

“The White House has far more leverage if they just let this deal fall apart and wait. The threat of the sequester kicking in will motivate members of Congress to actually negotiate in good faith and not propose a two-year deal that just blows up the spending cap levels,” he added. Sequestration spending cuts are due to take effect in January if no deal is reached.

Pelosi and Schumer will ask for “parity in increases” for defense and nondefense spending levels and want to avoid reverting to the 2020 spending caps set by the 2011 Budget Control Act, according to a senior Democratic aide.

The Democratic leaders also believe that a spending caps negotiation is the best place to talk about raising the debt ceiling, which the federal government officially hit on March 2. This has forced the Treasury Department to use “extraordinary measures” to pay the nation’s debts, a tactic it can stretch out until September or October.   

ADVERTISEMENT

A thorny question for Republicans is whether to insist on spending reforms in exchange for increasing the nation’s borrowing authority.

Mnuchin and Mulvaney met with McConnell in his office to discuss spending caps and the debt limit last week.

“I think it’s always a mistake to give the government more money to borrow and more room to borrow without reforming the way we spend it,” said Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulTurkey sanctions face possible wall in GOP Senate Trump-Graham relationship tested by week of public sparring Overnight Defense — Presented by Boeing — Pence says Turkey agrees to ceasefire | Senators vow to move forward with Turkey sanctions | Mulvaney walks back comments tying Ukraine aid to 2016 probe MORE (R-Ky.). “You can’t just run a deficit perpetually — and your interest payments are crowding out everything and interest is destined to become the No. 1 item in our budget.

“Only in U.S. budgetary politics do people get rewarded for bad decisionmaking, and basically perpetual bad decisionmaking where they never fix the problem and they just simply continue to raise the ability to borrow more,” he added.

White House officials floated the idea during the Easter recess of moving quickly on raising the debt ceiling by separating it from the broader spending talks.

But Senate Republicans are siding with Democrats in saying that it makes sense to take care of spending caps and the debt ceiling in the same deal.

“It makes sense to me,” Sen. John CornynJohn CornynTrump slams 'very dumb' O'Rourke for proposals on guns, tax exempt status for churches GOP cautions Graham against hauling Biden before Senate Succession at DHS up in the air as Trump set to nominate new head MORE (R-Texas), a member of McConnell’s leadership team.

Cornyn acknowledged that striking a deal with Democrats will mean raising the spending caps compared to fiscal 2019, a far cry from what Trump proposed in his budget.

“Sadly, there doesn’t appear to be a political consensus to reducing the deficit, so I’m taking it as a given that it won’t,” Cornyn said of a prospective two-year deal.

The Trump budget calls for cutting regular spending to the fiscal 2020 levels set by the 2011 Budget Control Act and increasing defense spending through the overseas contingency operations fund, which is not subject to budget caps.

Rachel Bovard, the senior director of policy at the Conservative Partnership Institute, said the White House and GOP leaders in Congress aren’t on the same page about how to handle the spending talks. “There’s a little frustration at the White House because they’ve been saying we don’t want a [spending] caps deal but this is what the bipartisan leadership is now presenting to them,” she said.

She said White House priorities to rein in spending are “completely being ignored” by congressional leaders who “want to blow the deficit with a two-year caps deal.”

Spending negotiations have been bogged down for weeks as a partisan disagreement over disaster relief has sucked up the attention of leaders on Capitol Hill.

Sen. Shelley Moore CapitoShelley Wellons Moore CapitoGaetz: Some lawmakers reviewed transcript at White House On The Money: Trump takes aim at China in UN address | Consumer confidence fell as trade tensions rose | Senate proposes billion for Trump border wall Senate proposes billion for Trump border wall MORE (R-W.Va.) said she hopes for a breakthrough this week. “We’re stalled now,” she said. “The longer you wait, the less planning you can do, the less investigation, the less transparency there is.”

Schumer on Monday said congressional leaders had cleared a big hurdle in the disaster relief talks by reaching agreement on providing more aid to Puerto Rico, something Trump balked at in March during a lunch meeting with the Senate GOP.

“On Puerto Rico, there’s pretty much agreement. Puerto Rico’s going to be in good shape,” he told reporters. “We’re trying to come to an agreement on the border. There were some things they asked for on the border that we thought were OK and some not.”

--This report was updated at 7:14 a.m.