Pelosi takes fire from progressives over border

Tensions in the House Democratic Caucus are spilling into the open over how to address dismal conditions at migrant detention centers on the border.

Progressives are angry with centrists and Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiBiden blasts Trump, demands he release transcript of call with foreign leader Pelosi wants to change law to allow a sitting president to be indicted Overnight Health Care — Presented by Partnership for America's Health Care Future — Walmart to stop selling e-cigarettes | Senators press FDA to pull most e-cigarettes immediately | House panel tees up e-cig hearing for next week MORE (D-Calif.) for the decision to move a $4.6 billion emergency funding bill already passed by the Senate through the House.

ADVERTISEMENT

The bill, passed at the end of June before lawmakers went on their July 4 recess, provided funds to run migrant shelters, but liberals argue the legislation did not impose tough enough rules to ensure migrants are fed and sheltered at a reasonable standard.

Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-Ariz.), a former co-chairman of the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), told The Hill that taking up the Senate version of the bill was “a mistake.”

“By not being firm enough with [the Department of Homeland Security] ... you continue to weaponize that department to serve Trump and Trump only,” said Grijalva, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee.

Frictions between Pelosi and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezMarkey fundraises ahead of Kennedy primary challenge The Hill's Campaign Report: De Blasio drops out | Warren gains support from black voters | Sanders retools campaign team | Warning signs for Tillis in NC Progressives push for changes to Pelosi drug pricing plan MORE (D-N.Y.) also have come to the forefront over the bill.

In an interview with New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd published over the weekend, Pelosi shrugged off criticism of the funding bill from Ocasio-Cortez and three of her strongest allies, Reps. Ilhan OmarIlhan OmarGOP Senate candidate said Republicans have 'dual loyalties' to Israel Hillicon Valley: Zuckerberg to meet with lawmakers | Big tech defends efforts against online extremism | Trump attends secretive Silicon Valley fundraiser | Omar urges Twitter to take action against Trump tweet Omar asks Twitter what it's doing in response to Trump spreading 'lies that put my life at risk' MORE (D-Minn.), Rashida TlaibRashida Harbi TlaibMarkey fundraises ahead of Kennedy primary challenge The Hill's Campaign Report: De Blasio drops out | Warren gains support from black voters | Sanders retools campaign team | Warning signs for Tillis in NC Omar says she hopes Netanyahu not reelected MORE (D-Mich.) and Ayanna PressleyAyanna PressleyDemocrats blast HUD for removing LGBT language from grant competition Hillicon Valley: Zuckerberg to meet with lawmakers | Big tech defends efforts against online extremism | Trump attends secretive Silicon Valley fundraiser | Omar urges Twitter to take action against Trump tweet Omar asks Twitter what it's doing in response to Trump spreading 'lies that put my life at risk' MORE (D-Mass.). 

“All these people have their public whatever and their Twitter world,” said Pelosi. “But they didn’t have any following. They’re four people and that’s how many votes they got.”

Ocasio-Cortez returned fire over Twitter, writing “that public ‘whatever’ is called public sentiment.”

And the Progressive Change Campaign Committee on Monday launched a fundraising effort slamming Pelosi’s criticism of Ocasio-Cortez.

Pelosi in the interview defended her decision to bring the Senate bill to the floor. Seventy-one Democrats, mostly progressives, voted against the legislation in a 322-85 vote. Only 14 Republicans voted “no.”

She blamed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOvernight Energy: California, 23 other states sue Trump over vehicle emissions rule | Climate strike protests hit cities across globe | Interior watchdog expands scope of FOIA investigation | Dems accuse officials of burying climate reports Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers say Zuckerberg to 'cooperate' on antitrust probes | Dems see victory after McConnell backs election security funds | Twitter takes down fake pro-Saudi accounts Liberal super PAC launches browser extension replacing 'Mitch McConnell' with 'Moscow Mitch' MORE (R-Ky.), saying he wouldn’t have allowed a vote in the Senate on legislation that included tougher requirements for the treatment of people held in detention centers.

In a “Dear Colleague” letter sent to House Democrats on Monday, Pelosi said the caucus’s top priorities would be improving detention center conditions and preventing the Trump administration from adding a citizenship question to the decennial census.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Whether or not the President responds to our request to improve medical care standards for the health and safety of children, and while Senator McConnell still refuses to help the children suffering in these deplorable conditions, we must lead a Battle Cry across America to protect the children,” wrote Pelosi.

She also endorsed a bill introduced by Rep. Veronica EscobarVeronica EscobarGun epidemic is personal for lawmakers touched by violence House holds moment of silence for El Paso victims House Republicans want details on Democrats' trips to Mexico MORE (D-Texas) that would require better training for agents at detention centers.

Grijalva and other progressives are also angry with the bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus, a coalition of moderate Republicans and Democrats who have signed a pledge to vote together on issues where 75 percent of the group, and 51 percent of both the Republicans and Democrats in the group, agree.

Progressives see the Problem Solvers as obstructionist, despite the group’s stated ambition to untangle political knots.

“The problem with the Problem Solvers is they’ve made triangulation an art form,” said Grijalva. “In action, [they’re] dominated by the Republican agenda.”

Rep. Josh GottheimerJoshua (Josh) GottheimerThe Hill's Morning Report - US coastline readies for Hurricane Dorian to make landfall Swing-seat Democrats oppose impeachment, handing Pelosi leverage Republicans plot comeback in New Jersey MORE (D-N.J.), a co-chairman of the Problem Solvers Caucus, told The Hill in an interview that getting a bill passed and signed into law quickly was important for the emergency border supplemental.

“On that particular issue, obviously, part of why many of us felt it was essential that we actually pass legislation is we had to get immediate humanitarian aid to children and not delay,” said Gottheimer.

Gottheimer said the fact that the bill was passed with a large majority showed it was smart to move the Senate version and get help to people at the facilities quickly.

“To walk away without delivering humanitarian aid to children was just unconscionable. So that was what guided my decision. And I think now, on the bigger picture, we’ve got to get comprehensive reform done,” added Gottheimer.

But progressives say Gottheimer and other Democrats who backed the bill were doing the bidding of McConnell and the Trump administration. They argue Democrats should have stuck together and used their leverage to win a stronger bill. And they are stung by the fact that more Democrats opposed the bill on the floor than House Republicans.

CPC Co-Chairman Mark PocanMark William PocanDemocrats press Nadler to hold Lewandowski in contempt Omar says US should reconsider aid to Israel Trump crosses new line with Omar, Tlaib, Israel move MORE (D-Wis.) said the Problem Solvers’ push for the Senate bill could make it difficult to work with them in the future.

On Twitter, Pocan referred to the group as “the Child Abuse Caucus.”

“I mean, it’s just gonna be a lot harder for us to care enough to help deliver votes,” he said.

One Democratic lawmaker said there is talk of plans to slow down progress on Problem Solvers members’ bills during committee in the wake of their role in the passage of the Senate bill. 

Progressives wield substantial power in the House legislative process.

CPC members chair many influential House committees, including Judiciary, Rules, Oversight and Reform, Homeland Security, Small Business and Natural Resources.

Grijalva warned Problem Solvers and other moderates who try to “thread the needle” to avoid partisan conflict on issues would ultimately have to face public opinion.

“They need to ‘thread’ lightly,” said Grijalva.

But the Natural Resources chairman dismissed the possibility of using the CPC’s chairmanships to exclude moderates from the legislative process.

“I don’t think pettiness is a strategy and I don’t think retribution is a strategy,” he said.