SPONSORED:

House Democrats subpoena White House for Ukraine documents

House Democrats have followed through on their threat to issue a subpoena to the White House for documents concerning President TrumpDonald TrumpBiden to hold virtual bilateral meeting with Mexican president More than 300 charged in connection to Capitol riot Trump Jr.: There are 'plenty' of GOP incumbents who should be challenged MORE's dealings with Ukraine.

The chairmen of three House panels notified acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyMick MulvaneyOMB nominee gets hearing on Feb. 9 Republicans now 'shocked, shocked' that there's a deficit Financial firms brace for Biden's consumer agency chief MORE of the subpoena in a letter on Friday. The subpoena is being issued by the chamber's Oversight and Reform Committee.

The Democrats are seeking documents related to Trump's efforts to pressure the Ukrainian government to investigate former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHouse Democrats pass sweeping .9T COVID-19 relief bill with minimum wage hike Biden to hold virtual bilateral meeting with Mexican president More than 300 charged in connection to Capitol riot MORE, a top political rival and leading Democratic presidential contender.

Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah CummingsElijah Eugene CummingsHouse Democrats reintroduce bill to reduce lobbyist influence Trump voters and progressives have a lot in common — and Biden can unite them We must act on lowering cost of prescription drugs MORE (D-Md.) warned in a memo on Wednesday that he would issue the subpoena if the White House didn't comply by the end of the week.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Cummings and the other two committee chairmen leading the impeachment inquiry — Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffOvernight Defense: Biden sends message with Syria airstrike | US intel points to Saudi crown prince in Khashoggi killing | Pentagon launches civilian-led sexual assault commission Democrats demand Saudi accountability over Khashoggi killing US intel: Saudi crown prince approved Khashoggi killing MORE (D-Calif.) and Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Eliot EngelEliot Lance EngelProgressives target Manchin, Sinema with new PAC State Department sets up new bureau for cybersecurity and emerging technologies How Congress dismissed women's empowerment MORE (D-N.Y.) — said they had not received any response as of Friday evening.

“We deeply regret that President Trump has put us—and the nation—in this position, but his actions have left us with no choice but to issue this subpoena,” the chairmen wrote in a letter to Mulvaney.

The White House pushed back on the subpoena Friday night, arguing in a statement that the subpoena "changes nothing – just more document requests, wasted time, and taxpayer dollars that will ultimately show the President did nothing wrong."

"The Do Nothing Democrats can continue with their kangaroo court while the President and his Administration will continue to work on behalf of the American people," White House press secretary Stephanie GrishamStephanie GrishamMelania Trump says she was 'disappointed and disheartened' watching Capitol riots Trump resignations gaining steam GOP senators urging Trump officials to not resign after Capitol chaos MORE added in the statement.

The House panels have been pursuing the documents for weeks to no avail. They first sent a letter to the White House asking for the documents by Sept. 16, but received no response.

The chairmen sent another letter on Sept. 24 to follow up, but again did not get a response from the White House. The subpoena demands that the White House hand over the requested documents by Oct. 18.

Friday marked the third subpoena issued by House Democrats since they began their impeachment inquiry last week amid rising scrutiny over Trump's interactions with Ukraine.

Democrats have seized on details from a whistleblower complaint about Trump's efforts to push Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden and his son, Hunter.

Trump has questioned Biden's efforts as vice president to convince Ukraine to fire a top prosecutor in 2016. The prosecutor general had at one point looked into an energy company where Hunter Biden served on the board.

There is no evidence either of the Bidens engaged in wrongdoing.

The Intelligence Committee, in consultation with the Foreign Affairs and Oversight panels, issued a subpoena on Monday to Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiBiden administration buys 100,000 doses of Lilly antibody drug NAACP president accuses Trump of having operated under 'white supremacist doctrine' MyPillow CEO says boycotts have cost him M MORE, for his role in pressuring Ukrainian officials to investigate the Bidens. And last week, the Foreign Affairs Committee issued a subpoena to Secretary of State Mike PompeoMike PompeoUS intel: Saudi crown prince approved Khashoggi killing Golden statue of Trump at CPAC ridiculed online Five things to watch at CPAC MORE for documents.

The committees also sent a letter earlier Friday to Vice President Pence asking for documents related to his role in Trump's efforts to press for an investigation into the Bidens, but the request was not a subpoena.

Trump said Friday that he would send a letter to Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiHouse Democrats pass sweeping .9T COVID-19 relief bill with minimum wage hike Budget Committee chair pledges to raise minimum wage: 'Hold me to it' Capitol review to recommend adding more fencing, 1,000 officers: report MORE (D-Calif.) challenging the authority to demand documents since the House has not formally voted on its impeachment inquiry.

"We’ve been treated very unfairly, very different from anybody else," Trump said.

The House chairmen dismissed the argument that a floor vote was needed.

“A vote of the full House is not required to launch an impeachment inquiry, and there is no authority for the White House to make this claim,” the chairmen wrote.

Democrats are demanding all communications regarding Trump's July call with Zelensky as well as another call from April shortly after the Ukrainian leader won election. They are also asking for "the identity of all individuals who listened to, participated in, assisted in preparation for, transcribed, took notes during, or received information" about the two calls.

Lawmakers are also requesting records of all meetings and communications between current and former White House officials and Giuliani, as well as Attorney General William BarrBill BarrMajority of Republicans say 2020 election was invalid: poll Biden administration withdraws from Connecticut transgender athlete case Justice Department renews investigation into George Floyd's death: report MORE.

The whistleblower complaint filed over Trump's July call with Zelensky stated that senior White House officials moved to "lock down" all records of the call, including removing the transcript from the computer system where it would be typically stored to a separate, restricted electronic system.

The committees are further demanding documents related to efforts to restrict access to records of the phone call and are asking for documents related to efforts by current or former White House officials to identify or retaliate against the whistleblower. 

Trump has publicly attacked the whistleblower in recent days.

"[W]hy aren’t we entitled to interview & learn everything about the Whistleblower, and also the person who gave all of the false information to him. This is simply about a phone conversation that could not have been nicer, warmer, or better. No pressure at all (as confirmed by Ukrainian Pres.). It is just another Democrat Hoax!" Trump tweeted Tuesday.

As with their other demands for documents, the chairmen warned Mulvaney that a failure to comply with the subpoena would be used as evidence of obstruction as they move to potentially craft articles of impeachment.

"Your failure or refusal to comply with the subpoena, including at the direction or behest of the president or others at the White House, shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House's impeachment inquiry and may be used as an adverse inference against you and the president," they wrote.

Updated: 7:17 p.m.