Gaetz filing ethics complaint against Pelosi for ‘destroying’ Trump speech
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) announced that he is filing an ethics complaint against Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for “destroying” a copy of President Trump’s speech after his State of the Union address.
“BREAKING: I’m filing an ethics complaint against @SpeakerPelosi for destroying @realDonaldTrump’s State of the Union speech,” Gaetz tweeted late Wednesday. “Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071).”
“Nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable,” he added.
BREAKING: I’m filing an ethics complaint against @SpeakerPelosi for destroying @realDonaldTrump‘s State of the Union speech.
Her conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071).
Nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable. pic.twitter.com/dXPPWQNtI8
— Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) February 6, 2020
Gaetz also included two screenshots of the complaint he sent to House Ethics Committee Chairman Theodore Deutch (D-Fla.) and Rep. Kenny Marchant (R-Texas), the ranking member on the committee.
In the complaint, Gaetz calls on the committee to open an investigation into what he described as “flagrant violation of decorum” committed by Pelosi when she ripped up a copy of the president’s prepared speech at the end of his third State of the Union address Tuesday night.
“It is hard to overlook the symbolism of such a gesture — the sense that Speaker Pelosi was utterly dismissive of the President’s achievements, and, more importantly, the achievements of the American people,” Gaetz wrote.
Gaetz said Pelosi’s gesture was “deeply” offensive and appeared to violate the House’s Code of Official Conduct on decorum as well as a statute that prohibits the destruction, mutilation or removal of federal records “filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States.”
In the complaint, Gaetz requested a criminal referral for the “potential violation” and said the Speaker’s “unseemly behavior certainly warrants censure.”
“The Speaker should not let her personal feelings about the President color her behavior as a leader in the United States Congress,” he also wrote, “but last night, her actions have brought discredit on the entire House.”
Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, Drew Hammill, fired back at Gaetz in a statement to The Hill on Thursday morning, calling the complaint a “frivolous stunt.”
Gaetz had also appeared on “The Ingraham Angle” to discuss his decision to file a complaint against Pelosi, saying: “She disgraced the House of Representatives, she embarrassed our country and she destroyed official records.”
However, Ingraham, a former Supreme Court law clerk, pushed back on that notion.
“Well, it’s not really a formal record because it’s a copy of the speech that the president signed. … This is cute, but it’s not going to work,” she said.
The complaint was also met with pushback from some experts.
“The point of the statute is to prevent people from destroying records in official repositories like the National Archives or in courts,” Georgetown Law professor Victoria Nourse told Politifact.
Douglas Cox, who teaches at the City of New York University School of Law, told the outlet that Pelosi’s “copy of the State of the Union address is not a government record or government property at all.”
“It is personal property,” he said.
Pelosi captured widespread attention earlier this week after she ripped up Trump’s prepared remarks at the end of his State of the Union address.
When explaining the gesture during a closed-door caucus meeting on Wednesday, sources said Pelosi told lawmakers, “He shredded the truth, so I shredded his speech.”
“You are supposed to talk about the State of the Union, not the state of your alleged mind,” she also said then, after calling Trump’s speech “a manifesto of mistruths.”
—Updated at 11:21 a.m.
Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.