House approves George Floyd Justice in Policing Act

The House late Wednesday night gave the green light to the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act in a 220-212 vote.

The vote was initially scheduled to happen Thursday but was moved up due to a potential threat to the Capitol related to the QAnon conspiracy theory. 

Rep. Ilhan OmarIlhan OmarThere will be no new immigration law under Biden, unless he changes course Free Speech Inc.: The Democratic Party finds a new but shaky faith in corporate free speech Schumer works to balance a divided caucus's demands MORE (D), who represents the Minnesota district where George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police last May, served as Speaker pro tempore during the floor debate over the legislation. 


The sweeping police reform bill received no Republican votes. Initially, Rep. Lance GoodenLance GoodenLoyalty trumps policy in Stefanik's rise, Cheney's fall GOP frustration with Liz Cheney 'at a boiling point' Blackburn introduces bill to require migrant DNA testing at border MORE (R-Texas) had voted in favor of bill but he later tweeted that he had pressed the wrong button, a post he later deleted and replaced. Two Democrats, Reps. Jared Golden (Maine) and Ron KindRonald (Ron) James KindHouse Democrats hit Republicans on mobile billboard at GOP retreat House Republicans pressuring Democrats to return donations from Ocasio-Cortez Race debate grips Congress MORE (Wis.), voted against the measure.

The bill faces a tough road in the Senate, where GOP lawmakers are already bashing it as overly partisan.

Still, Rep. Joyce BeattyJoyce Birdson BeattyAdvocates warn against complacency after Chauvin verdict Democrats demand Biden administration reopen probe into Tamir Rice's death DOJ to probe Minneapolis police MORE (D-Ohio), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, said she and other leaders of the group have had "great conversations" with Sen. Tim ScottTimothy (Tim) Eugene ScottJuan Williams: Tim Scott should become a Democrat Clyburn says he's willing to compromise on qualified immunity in policing bill Democrats hit crucial stretch as filibuster fight looms MORE (R-S.C.) about finding middle ground in hopes of pushing the bill through the 50-50 Senate and to President BidenJoe BidenCaitlyn Jenner says election was not 'stolen,' calls Biden 'our president' Manchin, Biden huddle amid talk of breaking up T package Overnight Energy: 5 takeaways from the Colonial Pipeline attack | Colonial aims to 'substantially' restore pipeline operations by end of week | Three questions about Biden's conservation goals MORE’s desk. Scott, the only Black Republican senator, has his own police reform proposal, and has been open to elements of the Democrats' version.

"[It's] different than the last time, where we are in the country," Beatty said, referring to shifting cultural attitudes surrounding law enforcement. "I think it has given people more feeling of: this could be the right thing to do at the right time."

Beatty declined to say whether House Democrats are prepared to accept a slimmed-down version of the bill, but also isn't ruling anything out.

"I'm not at the point yet of taking [anything] out," she said. "We like the bill as it is."


Senate Republicans had balked, in particular, at the provision eliminating certain legal protections currently afforded to law enforcers in many states and precincts. Known as qualified immunity, those protections are needed, Republicans argue, to shield law enforcers from rampant litigation.

Rep. Karen BassKaren Ruth BassShining a light on COINTELPRO's dangerous legacy Tim Scott sparks buzz in crowded field of White House hopefuls Police reform talks ramp up amid pressure from Biden, families MORE (D-Calif.), the original sponsor of the bill, said she intends to counter those criticisms by examining localities where similar reforms have already been enacted.

"The states have taken up all kinds of reforms," Bass said. "And the sky hasn't fallen."

To be sure, the proposal has a better chance of garnering bipartisan support than another big piece of the House Democratic agenda, H.R. 1, a wide-reaching package overhauling the campaign finance system and restoring certain voting rights.

As it currently reads, the police reform bill would overhaul national policing standards on several levels.

Racial profiling at every level of law enforcement would be prohibited; chokeholds, carotid holds and no-knock warrants would be banned at the federal level; qualified immunity for officers would be overhauled and a national police misconduct registry would be created so officers who were fired for such discretions could not be hired by another police department.

Although the bill would not technically mandate the prohibition of certain reforms such as chokeholds at a state and local level, it would tie in the new federal standards as thresholds for police departments to meet if they wanted to continue receiving federal aid.

The legislation was introduced initially to the House last summer after George Floyd, a Black man, was killed by a Minneapolis police officer who knelt on Floyd’s neck for nearly nine minutes.

Floyd’s death, as well as the police killing of Breonna Taylor, sparked a summer dominated by nationwide Black Lives Matter protests demanding substantive police reform and the rooting out of systemic racism.

In addition to Bass’s bill in the House, Scott and Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulTim Scott sparks buzz in crowded field of White House hopefuls Sherrod Brown calls Rand Paul 'kind of a lunatic' for not wearing mask Overnight Health Care: WHO-backed Covax gets a boost from Moderna MORE (R-Ky.) introduced police reform proposals of their own in the Senate, underscoring the bipartisan nature of the issue.

Scott’s bill, the JUSTICE Act, covers many of the same areas of concern addressed by the Democrats’ bill such as the banning of chokeholds. Paul’s Justice for Breonna Taylor Act aimed to ban no-knock warrants — the technique which led to Taylor's death — something the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act would prohibit.

Still, the road to negotiating a bill that would pass the evenly split Senate could be arduous.


Scott in a statement Tuesday signaled he was open to discussing the proposed slashing of qualified immunity for officers, a policy point of contention, but called the House version of the bill “partisan.”

“I hope my friends on the other side of the aisle will come to the table to find common ground where we can make meaningful changes that will bring us closer to the goal of a more just country,” Scott said.

Mike Lillis contributed.

Updated 10:55 p.m.