House passes bill to combat gender pay gap

The House passed legislation on Thursday aimed at reducing gender-based pay discrimination and increasing employer accountability. 

Lawmakers approved the bill, titled the Paycheck Fairness Act, 217-210, with one Republican joining with Democrats in support.

House Democrats previously passed the legislation two years ago, but it never got traction in the Republican-controlled Senate. Even though Democrats now hold the Senate majority, it's unclear whether the bill will be able to secure enough votes to overcome a GOP filibuster.


Under the legislation, employers would be limited to justifying pay differentials in wage discrimination claims to "bona fide" factors such as education, training or experience and would be prohibited from retaliating against employees who compare salaries. Employers would also be barred from inquiring about prospective employees' salary histories during the hiring process.   

The bill would further direct the Labor Department to establish a grant program providing negotiation skills and training for girls and women.

Rep. Rosa DeLauroRosa DeLauroCapitol Police watchdog back in spotlight amid security concerns Battle lines drawn over Biden's support for vaccine waivers On The Money: Weekly jobless claims fall to 498K, hitting new post-lockdown low | House to advance appropriations bills in June, July MORE (D-Conn.), the chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee who has introduced the bill in every session of Congress since 1997, argued that the measures outlined in the legislation would help close the gender pay gap.

"I cannot tell you how difficult it has been to break through on something so simple, so simple: Men and women in the same job deserve the same pay," DeLauro said during House floor debate.  

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, women made about 82 percent of men's earnings in 2020. The gap is wider for women of color: Black and Latina women with bachelor's degrees make 65 percent while Black women with advanced degrees earned 70 percent compared with white men at the same education level. 


Republicans warned that the requirements in the legislation would be overly burdensome for employers and mostly serve to inspire scores of lawsuits. They also noted that some of the gender pay gap can be attributed to women choosing careers that allow for more flexible schedules so they have more time to care for their families. 

"Women should not be paid less than men for the same work. That is not up for debate," said Rep. Virginia FoxxVirginia Ann FoxxHouse Republicans press Biden Education secretary on reopening outreach North Carolina deputy killed in standoff after wellness check Two deputies shot in North Carolina, suspect barricaded in house MORE (N.C.), the top Republican on the House Education and Labor Committee. But the bill, Foxx argued, "is a false promise that creates opportunities and advantages only for trial lawyers looking for easy payouts while causing irreparable harm to employers."

"This bill purports to champion equality for women. Yet it disregards the 40 percent of small businesses owned by women that will be forced to implement pay policies found in government-run workplaces and be stuck paying through the nose in compliance costs if this bill passes," Foxx added. 

Rep. Elise StefanikElise Marie StefanikWarren says Republican party 'eating itself and it is discovering that the meal is poisonous' Roy won't rule out challenging Stefanik for GOP House Conference seat Cheney to any Trump-backed challenger: 'Bring it on' MORE (R-N.Y.) offered an alternative amendment that would protect employers from liability if it completes a wage analysis audit to determine if there are pay gaps among its workers. It would have also similarly restricted employers from relying on prospective employees' salary histories unless the person self-discloses during the interview process.  

Stefanik's amendment was rejected 183-244. 

The bigger obstacle for the legislation will be the Senate, where Democrats will need 10 GOP senators to support it to overcome a likely filibuster. There's no indication at this point that any Republicans back the measure.

"We will take this victory today from the House and take it over to the Senate and begin to work Republican senators one at a time, " said Sen. Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayBiden's pre-K plan is a bipartisan opportunity to serve the nation's children Schumer 'exploring' passing immigration unilaterally if talks unravel Senate Democrats push Biden over raising refugee cap MORE (D-Wash.), who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions and has introduced companion legislation in the upper chamber.