Patience wears thin as Democrats miss deadlines

Democrats are at risk of missing yet another self-imposed deadline to strike a long-sought deal on their sweeping social spending package.

Party leaders insisted a month ago that they were close to a deal and that a House vote on the Senate-passed bipartisan infrastructure bill was imminent — only to end up with neither.  

Now Democrats want to get it all done before President BidenJoe BidenBiden to provide update Monday on US response to omicron variant Restless progressives eye 2024 Emhoff lights first candle in National Menorah-lighting ceremony MORE leaves Washington on Thursday for an international climate summit and to boost gubernatorial candidates in Virginia and New Jersey in elections next Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

They also want to pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill in a matter of days since it would renew federal highway programs that are set to expire on Oct. 31, rather than turn to another short-term extension.

House and Senate Democrats have made significant headway in the last few weeks, but it’s far from clear a framework will be reached by Thursday, and lawmakers across the party were grumbling.

Sen. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineDemocrats plow ahead as Manchin yo-yos Senate advances defense bill after delay Overnight Defense & National Security — Presented by Boeing — Senators to take up defense bill Wednesday MORE (D-Va.), a former Virginia governor, expressed frustration that the party still didn’t have a deal that Democrat Terry McAuliffe could campaign on in the neck-and-neck Virginia gubernatorial race.

“I asked Biden last night, ‘By close you mean by the end of the day tomorrow’? ... He said probably not,” Kaine said, recounting a conversation he had with Biden on Tuesday.  

“This should have been done by now,” Kaine said. “This has been very frustrating to me, because I think we could have made a decision a while ago and if we had, it would have been good in Virginia, it would have been good for Biden.”

Kaine acknowledged that Democrats can’t afford to lose a vote and expressed hope a deal could be reached by the time Biden leaves for Rome on Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Yeah, that’s my hope,” he said.

Democratic leaders have defended setting public deadlines as a way to pressure negotiators.

“Well, my experience has been, if we don't say this is going to happen, it doesn't happen,” said House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerMaryland Democrats target lone Republican in redistricting scheme GOP leader's marathon speech forces House Democrats to push vote Overnight Energy & Environment — Land agency move hurt diversity: watchdog MORE (D-Md.). “It focuses people on decisionmaking. And that's the Speaker's point, and she's right.”

Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinGraham emerges as go-to ally for Biden's judicial picks 91 House Dems call on Senate to expand immigration protections in Biden spending bill Bipartisan senators press FBI, inspector general for changes following Nassar case MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, added, “I’m looking for any available deadline that will move us to an agreement.”

White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiThe massive messaging miscues of all the president's men (and women) Russian military buildup puts Washington on edge White House looks to rein in gas prices ahead of busy travel season MORE told reporters Wednesday that an agreement was still possible before Biden departs for Europe, but she also downplayed the need to do so.

“There is also broad agreement in Congress among Democrats who we need to support a unified path forward,” Psaki said. “What we’re talking about here is the nitty gritty details.”

But several major provisions of the package to expand social safety net programs remained unsettled on Wednesday. Chief among them: how to pay for it.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenLobbyists turn to infrastructure law's implementation Democrats plow ahead as Manchin yo-yos Overnight Energy & Environment — House passes giant climate, social policy bill MORE (D-Ore.) unveiled a proposal early Wednesday morning to tax billionaires’ investment gains annually. The proposal would affect taxpayers with assets of more than $1 billion or income of more than $100 million for three years in a row.  

Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinKlobuchar confident spending bill will be finished before Christmas Democratic frustration growing over stagnating voting rights bills Key senators to watch on Democrats' social spending bill MORE (D-W.Va.) appeared skeptical, telling reporters that it was “convoluted” but later stressed that “you should be paying your fair share.”  

Democrats are also still haggling over expanding Medicare and Medicaid, as well as allowing Medicare to negotiate prescription drug prices. Absent a reversal by Manchin, paid family and medical leave is expected to be dropped from the bill, a source familiar told The Hill.

Nevertheless, Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiNews media's sausage-making obsession helps no one Klobuchar confident spending bill will be finished before Christmas Five reasons for Biden, GOP to be thankful this season MORE (D-Calif.) announced that the House Rules Committee, which is the last stop before a bill hits the floor for a vote, will hold a hearing on Thursday “to advance this spectacular agenda” in an effort to project momentum as Biden leaves for Europe.

House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) said the hearing is meant to show that Democrats are making progress and “ready to start moving.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“We're serious about getting this stuff done. That's the bottom line,” McGovern said when asked about the hearing’s significance.

Pelosi told committee chairs that she wants legislative text for the agreed-upon provisions of the social spending package ready in time for the Rules hearing, according to a Democratic aide.

Other Democrats described a sense of confusion after Pelosi’s announcement.

“People were like, 'Did you sign off on the deal?' I said, 'What deal? I don't know!'” said Rep. Pramila JayapalPramila JayapalFive reasons for Biden, GOP to be thankful this season 91 House Dems call on Senate to expand immigration protections in Biden spending bill Democrats plow ahead as Manchin yo-yos MORE (D-Wash.), the Congressional Progressive Caucus leader.

Blowing through self-imposed deadlines is hardly new for Congress, where lawmakers struggle to even get must-pass bills like funding the government or raising the debt ceiling done on time.

“We’re used to it,” said Sen. Ben CardinBenjamin (Ben) Louis CardinIt's time for Congress to guarantee Medigap Health Insurance for vulnerable Americans with kidney disease Senators call for Smithsonian Latino, women's museums to be built on National Mall Democrats plow ahead as Manchin yo-yos MORE (D-Md.). “We roll with the process. ... This is following the normal pattern.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Mazie HironoMazie Keiko HironoSenators call for Smithsonian Latino, women's museums to be built on National Mall Democrats call out Biden Supreme Court commission Midterm gloom grows for Democrats MORE (D-Hawaii) added that she doesn’t “subscribe to all these deadlines” but that Democrats “should get on with it.”

“Considering that we don’t meet those deadlines, I question whether or not” public deadlines were helpful, she added. “But I do acknowledge that when you set a deadline it tends to focus people's minds on getting results, so from that standpoint sure.”

The Senate blew through self-imposed deadlines set by Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerDemocratic frustration growing over stagnating voting rights bills Schumer mourns death of 'amazing' father Feehery: The honest contrarian MORE (D-N.Y.) for a bipartisan group to work out its agreement on the bipartisan infrastructure bill, and last-minute negotiations dragged out for days even once senators announced they had a deal.

Pelosi and Schumer announced on Sept. 23 that Democratic leadership and key members had reached an agreement on the range of options for how to pay for the deal.

Pelosi had also made a commitment to a group of moderate Democrats in August that the House would vote by Sept. 27 on the bipartisan infrastructure bill. That vote first got pushed to Sept. 30 and then delayed indefinitely amid progressive resistance.

Pelosi this week has said she thinks a framework on the social spending package should be enough to hold a vote on the bipartisan bill. But progressives are still signaling reluctance if there isn’t firm legislative text for the other measure.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If there's a strong, strong framework, the president says that he supports this, then maybe. That's not even a definite. It's a maybe,” said Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.).

Yet other Democrats are signaling impatience with repeatedly extending the negotiations.

“I don't think we're in a position to keep kicking the can down the road. Infrastructure is very important, and we need to make sure that we meet the deadline that is imminent,” said Rep. Joyce BeattyJoyce Birdson BeattyWarnock: 'True justice' is a Black man not having to worry about being killed while jogging Biden: Guilty verdicts in Arbery case 'not enough' All 3 men in Arbery killing found guilty of murder MORE (D-Ohio), head of the Congressional Black Caucus.

Mike Lillis, Scott Wong and Morgan Chalfant contributed.