Washington Post, New York Times editors blast Assange indictment

Washington Post, New York Times editors blast Assange indictment
© Getty Images

Executive editors from top newspapers including The Washington Post and The New York Times voiced alarm over the Trump administration charging WikiLeaks founder Julian AssangeJulian Paul AssangeGlenn Greenwald calls charges against Assange a threat to journalistic freedoms Hillicon Valley: Justice Department announces superseding indictment against WikiLeaks' Assange | Facebook ad boycott gains momentum | FBI sees spike in coronavirus-related cyber threats | Boston city government bans facial recognition technology Justice Department announces superseding indictment against Wikileaks' Assange MORE under the Espionage Act, with Post executive editor Marty Baron arguing the decision "undermines the very purpose of the First Amendment."

The pushback comes after the Department of Justice on Thursday announced 17 additional felony charges against Assange, accusing him of conspiring with former Army intelligence office Chelsea ManningChelsea Elizabeth ManningHillicon Valley: Justice Department announces superseding indictment against WikiLeaks' Assange | Facebook ad boycott gains momentum | FBI sees spike in coronavirus-related cyber threats | Boston city government bans facial recognition technology Justice Department announces superseding indictment against Wikileaks' Assange Overnight Defense: National Guard activated to fight coronavirus | Pentagon 'fairly certain' North Korea has cases | General says Iran threat remains 'very high' after US strikes MORE to obtain and disclose "national defense information." Press freedom organizations widely panned the agency's move.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Dating as far back as the Pentagon Papers case and beyond, journalists have been receiving and reporting on information that the government deemed classified. Wrongdoing and abuse of power were exposed," Baron told The Daily Beast.

"With the new indictment of Julian Assange, the government is advancing a legal argument that places such important work in jeopardy and undermines the very purpose of the First Amendment."

Baron also defended "common practices in journalism" such as "constitutionally protected scrutiny of the press" while discussing President TrumpDonald John TrumpProgressive group launches M pro-Biden ad buy targeting young voters Ilhan Omar: GOP response to calls for police reform 'was vicious' White House considers sweeping travel ban on members, families of the Chinese Communist Party: report MORE referring to the press as "the enemy of the people."

“The administration has gone from denigrating journalists as ‘enemies of the people’ to now criminalizing common practices in journalism that have long served the public interest," Baron argued. "Meantime, government officials continue to engage in a decades-long practice of overclassifying information, often for reasons that have nothing to do with national security and a lot to do with shielding themselves from the constitutionally protected scrutiny of the press.”

New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet shared Baron's sentiment in calling the Assange indictment "deeply troubling."

“Obtaining and publishing information that the government would prefer to keep secret is vital to journalism and democracy," Baquet said in a Thursday statement. "The new indictment is a deeply troubling step toward giving the government greater control over what Americans are allowed to know."

The Justice Department defended its decision to charge Assange under the Espionage Act, stating the information released by WikiLeaks "made our adversaries stronger and more knowledge."

"These alleged actions disclosed our sensitive classified information in a manner that made it available to every terrorist group, hostile foreign intelligence service and opposing military,” said John Demers, the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's National Security Division. 

“Documents relating to these disclosures were even found in the Osama bin Laden compound. This release made our adversaries stronger and more knowledgeable, and the United States less secure.”