Welcome to The Hill’s Morning Report. Happy Tuesday! Our newsletter gets you up to speed on the most important developments in politics and policy, plus trends to watch. Alexis Simendinger and Al Weaver are the daily co-creators, so find us @asimendinger and @alweaver22 on Twitter and recommend the Morning Report to your friends. CLICK HERE to subscribe!
The Senate is readying for the impeachment trial of President TrumpDonald TrumpGraham says he hopes that Trump runs again Trump says Stacey Abrams 'might be better than existing governor' Kemp Executive privilege fight poses hurdles for Trump MORE to officially get underway next week as Republicans and Democrats continue to jostle over whether witnesses will be called and wait for Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiPelosi: House must pass 3 major pieces of spending legislation this week Sunday shows preview: Pelosi announces date for infrastructure vote; administration defends immigration policies GOP should grab the chance to upend Pelosi's plan on reconciliation MORE (D-Calif.) to officially transmit the articles to the upper chamber.
Pelosi is scheduled to meet with the Democratic caucus later this morning to determine next steps, which are expected to include sending the articles across the Capitol by the end of the week and naming impeachment managers.
As Scott Wong writes, the final actions by Pelosi and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffJan. 6 panel subpoenas four ex-Trump aides Bannon, Meadows Schiff: Criminal contempt charges possible for noncooperation in Jan. 6 probe The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Biden jumps into frenzied Dem spending talks MORE (D-Calif.) could include the decision to publish dozens of documents, recordings, photos and text messages from Lev Parnas, an associate of Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiThree Democrats call for investigation into Sidney Powell to move 'swiftly' Fox News bans Rudy Giuliani from appearing: report Alabama official dismisses Lindell claim that 100K votes were flipped from Trump to Biden: 'It's not possible' MORE, that may be relevant to the impeachment trial. Publishing the documents and related information could play into the decision for Senate Republicans to call witnesses or not in the coming weeks.
After the articles are sent to the Senate, the trial is expected to start soon. Sen. John CornynJohn CornynAbbott bows to Trump pressure on Texas election audit Senate panel advances antitrust bill that eyes Google, Facebook Democrats up ante in risky debt ceiling fight MORE (R-Texas), a top adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGOP should grab the chance to upend Pelosi's plan on reconciliation We don't need platinum to solve the debt ceiling crisis The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Democrats argue price before policy amid scramble MORE (R-Ky.), told reporters Monday that opening arguments of the trial are expected to start on Tuesday, Jan. 21.
One thing Senate Republicans have not released yet is the resolution laying out the rules for the impending trial. According to The Hill’s Jordain Carney, GOP aides expect the resolution to be released after Pelosi sends the articles to the Senate. Negotiations over the language in the resolution are ongoing.
The Hill: Republicans brush off Trump's call for impeachment dismissal.
CBS News: White House expects GOP defections on calling witnesses in Senate impeachment trial.
The Associated Press: Lawyer: Giuliani associate’s documents turned over to House.
As for the president, while he’s been vocal and maintained that he did nothing wrong, he continues to send mixed signals to the Senate GOP about what he wants from the upcoming trial. Trump's tweets from over the weekend, saying that he wants an “outright dismissal” of the articles by the Senate, put him in conflict with the strategy McConnell has advocated for weeks.
Senate Republicans say they are sticking with their goal of a quick trial, with most of the conference ready to eschew calling witnesses, although some have indicated that they want to hear from former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonOvernight Defense & National Security — Milley becomes lightning rod Joint Chiefs Chairman Milley becomes lightning rod on right Ex-Trump adviser Bolton defends Milley: 'His patriotism is unquestioned' MORE at some point.
While the vast majority of Senate Republicans would prefer not to hear from Bolton, most Americans say they’re all ears. According to a Quinnipiac University poll released Monday, 66 percent of respondents want Bolton to serve as a witness in the Senate trial, including 39 percent of Republicans, 71 percent of independents and 91 percent of Democrats (Axios).
It remains unclear whether additional witnesses will ultimately be called as Senate Democrats search for four Republican colleagues to agree with them. Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerDemocrats press Schumer on removing Confederate statues from Capitol Democrats' do-or-die moment Biden touts 'progress' during 'candid' meetings on .5T plan MORE (D-N.Y.) continued to argue Monday that McConnell and the GOP will be engaging in a cover-up if witnesses are not called.
“If seeking the truth is political, if doing our constitutional duty is political in the minds of our Republican colleagues, then the Republican Party is in trouble,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “History is not kind to political parties that fight to hide the truth. History is not kind to parties that participate in cover-ups.”
Meanwhile, McConnell kept up his criticisms of Pelosi for her “one-woman blockade” of the Senate trial.
“In terms of influencing Senate procedure, this strange gambit has achieved absolutely nothing,” McConnell said on the floor, adding that he is “glad the speaker finally realized she never had any leverage in the first place … and is giving in to bipartisan pressure to move forward.”
The Hill: How impeachment differs from court trials.
The Associated Press: McConnell is Trump’s man, assigned to shape his Senate trial.
The Hill: Poll: 51 percent of Americans support House vote to impeach Trump.
LEADING THE DAY
CAMPAIGNS & POLITICS: Sen. Cory BookerCory BookerTim Scott says police reform talks collapsed with Dems over funding Sunday shows preview: Pelosi announces date for infrastructure vote; administration defends immigration policies Democrats press Schumer on removing Confederate statues from Capitol MORE (D-N.J.) announced Monday that he is ending his Democratic primary bid after struggling for months to gain traction, headlined by his exclusion from the December debate, as the field winnows further less than three weeks out from the Iowa caucuses.
“It was a difficult decision to make, but I got in this race to win, and I’ve always said I wouldn’t continue if there was no longer a path to victory,” Booker said in an email to supporters. “Our campaign has reached the point where we need more money to scale up and continue building a campaign that can win — money we don’t have, and money that is harder to raise because I won’t be on the next debate stage and because the urgent business of impeachment will rightly be keeping me in Washington.”
Booker’s announcement brings the primary field to 12 candidates and further deprives the field of diversity that was an exemplar of the initial wide-ranging field last summer (The Hill). Over the last month and a half alone, Booker, Sen. Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisTwo 'View' hosts test positive for coronavirus ahead of Harris interview Rep. Karen Bass to run for mayor of Los Angeles: report Biden taps big bank skeptic to for top regulatory post MORE (D-Calif.) and former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro all have ended their campaigns.
The only two non-white candidates remaining are Andrew YangAndrew YangYang's new party will be called 'The Forward Party' Andrew Yang planning to launch third party: report Poll: 73 percent of Democratic voters would consider voting for Biden in the 2024 primary MORE and former Massachusetts Gov. Deval PatrickDeval PatrickOVERNIGHT ENERGY: Supreme Court sides with oil companies in Baltimore case| White House environmental justice advisers express opposition to nuclear, carbon capture projects | Biden administration to develop performance standards for federal buildings Approving Kristen Clarke's nomination should be a no-brainer To unite America, Biden administration must brace for hate MORE, who has been unable to garner the support levels that Booker attracted after his late entrance in the race.
The New Jersey Democrat’s announcement came to the displeasure of some in the party and a day before the top six candidates in the field will take part in the seventh primary debate in Des Moines.
“The final stages of the Republican primary were more diverse than that of the Democratic primary,” tweeted Bakari Sellers, a former South Carolina state lawmaker who served as a top surrogate for Harris’s campaign.
Another question related to Booker’s exit is who will be the beneficiary polling wise. According to a new national Morning Consult poll, 24 percent of Booker supporters say Biden is their second choice, followed by Sanders at 19 percent and Warren at 17 percent.
Niall Stanage: What the leading 2020 candidates need to do in tonight's Democratic debate.
The Associated Press: Booker ends presidential bid after polling, money struggles.
The New York Times: Booker’s exit from 2020 race ends a once-promising political chapter.
> Debate night: Most of the 2020 Democratic field will come together in Des Moines tonight for the latest party debate as the field nears the first votes of the year in the Hawkeye State.
All eyes will be on the four top-tier candidates in the field as the race remains fluid ahead of the Iowa caucuses. In recent days, various polls have shown Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersIn Washington, the road almost never taken Don't let partisan politics impede Texas' economic recovery The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Democrats argue price before policy amid scramble MORE (I-Vt.) or former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenHaiti prime minister warns inequality will cause migration to continue Pelosi: House must pass 3 major pieces of spending legislation this week Erdoğan says Turkey plans to buy another Russian defense system MORE topping the field in the state, with Sanders keeping up his attacks against others as he makes his closing case to voters in the state (The Hill).
Most notably, Sanders has found himself in a war of words with Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenIn Washington, the road almost never taken Senate poised to battle over Biden's pick of big bank critic Treasury says more rental aid is reaching tenants, preventing evictions MORE (D-Mass.) over the past couple of days, headlined by the Massachusetts Democrat’s charge that Sanders told her during a December 2018 meeting that a woman could not win a general election race against Trump.
After CNN reported the remarks earlier Monday, Warren followed suit and released a statement confirming Sanders’s sentiments. The Vermont Independent denied making any such remarks.
“I thought a woman could win; he disagreed. I have no interest in discussing this private meeting any further because Bernie and I have far more in common than our differences on punditry,” Warren said (The Hill).
As Jonathan Easley and Amie Parnes report, the back-and-forth between the two left-wing heavyweights has made progressives uneasy and has heightened concerns that a centrist candidate such as Biden or former South Bend, Ind., Mayor Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegDOJ sues to block JetBlue-American Airlines partnership On The Money — Presented by Wells Fargo — Pelosi plows full speed ahead on jam-packed agenda Blumenthal calls on Buttigieg to investigate American Airlines-JetBlue partnership MORE could take home the party’s nomination.
“Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, you both are progressive champions and our movement needs to see you working together to defeat your corporate Democratic opponents – not attack each other,” the progressive group Democracy for America said in a statement. “Progressives will win in 2020, but only if we don’t let the corporate wing or Trump divide us.”
The Washington Post: Sanders-Warren feud takes a turn onto the dangerous turf of gender.
The New York Times: Russians hacked Ukrainian gas company at center of impeachment.
The Hill: Biden leads in Iowa according to Monmouth poll.
The New York Times: Democratic super PAC books first TV ads in $150 million anti-Trump push.
IN FOCUS/SHARP TAKES
ADMINISTRATION, WAR POWERS & IRAN: As many as 10 Republican senators are considering bucking Trump on a measure that would limit his authority to take military action against Iran, according to the bipartisan co-sponsors of the resolution. The move in the Senate, which follows a House vote on war powers last week, is an overlay during what McConnell promises will be Trump’s Senate acquittal on two House charges of abuse of power.
The majority leader says he opposes the pending war powers resolution backed by Sens. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KainePanic begins to creep into Democratic talks on Biden agenda Congress facing shutdown, debt crisis with no plan B Democrats confront 'Rubik's cube on steroids' MORE (D-Va.) and Dick DurbinDick DurbinSchumer sets Monday showdown on debt ceiling-government funding bill Democrats surprised, caught off guard by 'framework' deal Senate panel advances antitrust bill that eyes Google, Facebook MORE (D-Ill.) as well as Republican co-sponsors Sens. Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeGraham says he hopes that Trump runs again Hillicon Valley — Presented by Xerox — Officials want action on cyberattacks Senate panel advances antitrust bill that eyes Google, Facebook MORE (Utah) and Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulGOP political operatives indicted over illegal campaign contribution from Russian national in 2016 White House debates vaccines for air travel Senate lawmakers let frustration show with Blinken MORE (Ky.). McConnell believes the effort sends the wrong message to U.S. allies following the Trump-ordered killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani (The Associated Press).
Lee said last week after an Iran briefing by Secretary of State Mike PompeoMike PompeoRepublican lawmakers raise security, privacy concerns over Huawei cloud services WashPost fact-checker gives Pompeo four 'Pinocchios' for 'zombie' claim about Obama Iran deal Poll: Biden, Trump statistically tied in favorability MORE and other top Trump advisers that the presentation was “probably the worst briefing I’ve seen, at least on a military issue,” during his nine years in the Senate.
The president chafes at the second-guessing, defending his decision to order a drone strike to kill Soleimani and nine others as justified because of the Quds Force leader’s “horrible past.” Trump said it did not matter to him if Soleimani posed an imminent or longer-term threat to U.S. national interests at the time he was killed at the Baghdad airport (The Hill).
It’s an argument that gives lawmakers significant pause because of international law, the fact that Soleimani was a senior member of the Iranian government and concerns that U.S. missile strikes against government officials abroad incite retaliation against Americans.
“The Fake News Media and their Democrat Partners are working hard to determine whether or not the future attack by terrorist Soleimani was `imminent’ or not, & was my team in agreement,” Trump tweeted. “The answer to both is a strong YES., but it doesn’t really matter because of his horrible past!”
The Washington Post: “Four embassies”: The anatomy of Trump’s unfounded claim about Iran.
Asked again on Monday as he left the White House about intelligence information he discussed with advisers, including Pompeo and others, Trump said Soleimani should have been killed by the United States “20 years ago.” He suggested any misgivings in Congress about his decision are tantamount to an embrace of a terrorist.
“We killed Soleimani, the No. 1 terrorist in the world by every account. Bad person, killed a lot of Americans, killed a lot of people. We killed him,” he said.
The bipartisan support for a Senate resolution to restrict Trump’s authority to attack Iran militarily counters the president’s political argument that it is Democrats who are his critics, especially during a push to remove him from office.
Trump again asserted without examples or evidence that Democrats have defended Soleimani, which he said is “a disgrace to our country. They can't do that. And let me tell you, it's not working politically very well for them.”
Pelosi, Kaine and other leading Democrats say their condemnation of Iran’s former military mastermind was emphatic and well known for years.
During a Fox News interview on Monday, Pompeo did not repeat Trump’s evolving description of an Iranian plot to attack four U.S. embassies.
“We can dance around the maypole on the word `imminent,’” the secretary said. “We know that he was traveling in the region both to Beirut and then to Damascus and on to Baghdad with the intense, intent purpose of delivering a strike, a blow against Americans in the region. We weren’t about to take that risk.”
The Associated Press: Pompeo, Attorney General William BarrBill BarrTrump pushes back on book claims, says he spent 'virtually no time' discussing election with Lee, Graham Woodward: Milley was 'setting in motion sensible precautions' with calls to China Barr-Durham investigation again fails to produce a main event MORE cite deterrence as long-running motive behind Soleimani’s killing.
The New Yorker: Barr as “Trump’s sword and shield.”
The Associated Press: Iran today said it arrested unnamed suspects after an “extensive investigation” into the shootdown of a passenger jet over Tehran, which killed 176 people. Iran initially said the tragedy was the result of the Boeing plane’s mechanics, then conceded its own missile strike was at fault and was a “mistake.” That concession sparked days of anti-government denunciations and street protests in Iran.
Reuters: Britain, France and Germany will trigger a dispute resolution mechanism in the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, the most definitive response the Europeans have taken as Tehran withdrew from nuclear commitments after the U.S. pulled out of the agreement in 2018.
The Morning Report is created by journalists Alexis Simendinger and Al Weaver. We want to hear from you! Email: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com. We invite you to share The Hill’s reporting and newsletters, and encourage others to SUBSCRIBE!
It’s time for the Democratic candidates to talk more about national security, by Brad Bannon, opinion contributor, The Hill. https://bit.ly/2Nn3nk8
The political earthquake propelling Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, by Grady Means, opinion contributor, The Hill. https://bit.ly/2FJNxfa
WHERE AND WHEN
Hill.TV’s “Rising” program features Paul Steinhauser, a New Hampshire-based political reporter with Fox News Politics, to preview tonight’s debates; W. James Antle III, editor-in-chief of The American Conservative, to discuss the situation in Iran; and J.D. Scholten, a Democratic congressional candidate in Iowa, to talk about tonight’s debate and the Iowa caucuses just around the corner. Coverage starts at 9 a.m. ET at http://thehill.com/hilltv or on YouTube at 10 a.m. at Rising on YouTube.
The House meets at 10 a.m. and is expected to debate and vote on a resolution appointing and authorizing managers for the Senate impeachment trial of the president.
The Senate convenes at 10 a.m. and will resume debating the nomination of Peter Gaynor to be administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The president headlines a reelection rally in Milwaukee at 7 p.m.
Vice President Pence will swear in Gen. John Raymond, a member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as the first chief of space operations, U.S. Space Force (USSF) at 11:45 a.m.
Pompeo is in the San Francisco Bay area through Wednesday to meet with representatives from U.S. tech companies as well as counterparts from Japan and Korea.
Economic indicator: The Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the U.S. consumer price index for December at 8:30 a.m.
The Hill hosts “The Right to a Roof: Tackling Homelessness” at 8:30 a.m. in Washington. Information HERE. Lawmakers scheduled to participate with housing experts to discuss housing security include Reps. Joyce BeattyJoyce Birdson BeattyDemocrats press Schumer on removing Confederate statues from Capitol Black Caucus meets with White House over treatment of Haitian migrants White House faces increased cries from allies on Haitian migrants MORE (D-Ohio), Danny DavisDaniel (Danny) K. DavisLIVE COVERAGE: Ways and Means begins Day 2 on .5T package Biden emboldens establishment Democrats with ballot box wins Lobbying world MORE (D-Ill.) and Alan LowenthalAlan Stuart LowenthalLooking to the past to secure America's clean energy future Shakespeare gets a congressional hearing in this year's 'Will on the Hill' Face mask PPE is everywhere now — including the ocean MORE (D-Calif.).
The Hill also hosts an event next Tuesday, “Mayors Matter: Deepening the Generational Compact in Communities,” in Washington from 2 to 4 p.m. with influential mayors from Michigan, Kansas and Florida and community leaders who describe contributions of older adults and the societal benefits of intergenerational bonds. Find information HERE.
The Democratic National Committee hosts the first presidential primary debate of 2020 televised by CNN from Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, at 9 p.m. (Des Moines Register).
It will soon be U.S. Census season around the country, and Mayor Bill de BlasioBill de BlasioFederal appeals court blocks NYC teacher vaccine mandate Meghan, Prince Harry visit One World Trade Center Google to purchase Manhattan building for .1 billion MORE at 10:30 a.m. welcomes representatives from 157 community-based organizations for a planning conference at New York University about census education, outreach and mobilization. The work is funded through New York City’s “Complete Count Fund.” The 2020 Census begins March 12.
➔ Trade: The powerful pharmaceutical industry is trying to get U.S. senators on record in support of including protections the industry lost in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement into future trade deals with other countries (The Hill).
➔ Courts: Pharmaceutical makers were in court on Monday to argue against a Trump administration rule that would require the companies to disclose to consumers in their ads the list prices for drugs. The companies assert such a federal requirement would violate the First Amendment (The Hill).
➔ Major League Baseball cheating & punishments: Houston Astros general manager Jeff Luhnow and manager A.J. Hinch were fired by owner Jim Crane on Monday after the league’s announcement of discipline following an elaborate scheme to use cameras to decode opposing catchers’ signs in real time and relay the intelligence to players during games. “We need to move forward with a clean slate,” Crane said. A league investigation confirmed the Astros had cheated during the regular season and playoffs of their World Series-winning 2017 season. As part of the league's penalty, the Astros will also lose first- and second-round draft picks in 2020 and 2021, and the organization was fined a record $5 million. MLB said in its statement that if Luhnow or Hinch "engage in any future material violations" of MLB rules, they will be placed on the league's permanently ineligible list (ESPN).
➔ College Football Championship: The Louisiana State Tigers are the 2019-20 College Football Playoff champions after defeating the Clemson Tigers, 42-25, and nabbing it’s fourth national title and first since the playoff was instituted in 2014. The Tigers were led by quarterback Joe Burrow, the likely No. 1 pick in the upcoming NFL Draft, who tossed five touchdowns and ran for another one. In the process, Burrow set a record with 60 touchdown passes in a single season (ESPN). The president watched the game alongside first lady Melania TrumpMelania TrumpFormer aide sees Melania Trump as 'the doomed French queen': book If another 9/11 happened in a divided 2021, could national unity be achieved again? Former Trump aide Stephanie Grisham planning book: report MORE and House Minority Whip Steve ScaliseStephen (Steve) Joseph ScaliseFifth House Republican comes out in support of bipartisan infrastructure bill Democratic leaders racing toward Monday infrastructure vote House GOP to whip against bipartisan infrastructure bill MORE (R-La.) and was cheered when he took the field for the national anthem (The Hill).
➔ Oscars: The 92nd annual Academy Awards nominations for best picture, announced on Monday for a Feb. 9 presentation on ABC, include films representing a wide range of genres and the dark comic book smash “Joker” leading the field with 11 nominations. In the top lineup: the World War I epic “1917,” Quentin Tarantino’s 1960s fantasia “Once Upon a Time ... in Hollywood” and Martin Scorsese’s gangster epic “The Irishman” (Netflix). Other nominees for best picture are “Ford v Ferrari,” “Jojo Rabbit,” “Little Women,” “Marriage Story” (Netflix) and “Parasite.” The nominations proved to be a shutout for female directors, with potential nominees such as Greta Gerwig (“Little Women”), Lulu Wang (“The Farewell”) and Marielle Heller (“A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood”) failing to get a nod from the members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (The Los Angeles Times). The Hollywood Reporter has a list of all the nominees HERE.
And finally … In the pantheon of British history, restless royals have wandered the empire from castle to fortress, engineered marital mergers and escaped the drudgery of good works with bad behavior. Who knew that Canada would represent emancipation for renegade Prince Harry, American wife Meghan Merkle and their adorable son Archie?
On Monday, Queen Elizabeth II presided over a historic summit among her son and his sons, and decided to back the new “progressive” roles Harry and his wife already publicly announced — as part-time royals who want to live in North America and occasionally return to Great Britain.
Hinting at unresolved “complex matters,” including income, employment, security and tradition, the Queen released a statement in which she emphasized “family” at least seven times (The Associated Press).
“Today my family had very constructive discussions on the future of my grandson and his family. My family and I are entirely supportive of Harry and Meghan’s desire to create a new life as a young family. Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working members of the royal family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family.”
The British press, with all its intense opinions about the monarchy, did not hold back. The Guardian said the queen’s message was a “reluctant blessing.” The Daily Mail served up breathless details — Prince Charles talked money and Meghan did not participate— behind what headline writers call “MEGXIT.”