Senators: NSA phone sweeping has been going on since 2007

The leaders of the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday said senators were informed of the administration’s sweeping surveillance practices, which they said have been going on since 2007.


Watch video from The Hill
• The Hill's Bob Cusack breaks down the story


“Everyone’s been aware of it for years, every member of the Senate,” said Sen. Saxby ChamblissClarence (Saxby) Saxby ChamblissSenate buzz grows for Abrams after speech electrifies Dems Ossoff tests waters for Georgia Senate run CIA's ‘surveillance state’ is operating against us all MORE (Ga.), the ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee.

ADVERTISEMENT
Chambliss told reporters that the program has been going on for seven years under the auspices of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. He said he was not aware of a single citizen filing a complaint about it.

He and Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinFeinstein says she thinks Biden will run after meeting with him Trump judicial nominee Neomi Rao seeks to clarify past remarks on date rape Bottom Line MORE (D-Calif.), the panel’s chairwoman, also gave a defense of the program. “There have been approximately 100 plots and also arrests made since 2009 by the FBI,” Feinstein said. “I do not know to what extent metadata was used or if it was used, but I do know this, gentlemen, that terrorists will come after us if they can, and the only thing we have to deter this is good intelligence.”

Feinstein and Chambliss circulated a Feb. 8, 2011, letter, which both signed, inviting colleagues to read a classified report detailing the electronic surveillance authority granted by the Patriot Act and the Intelligence Reform Act of 2004.


The Senate voted in late December to reauthorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by a count of 73 to 23. The legislation extended surveillance authority for U.S. intelligence agencies by five years.

Some lawmakers on Thursday said they do not remember being briefed on the full extent of intelligence activities.

“If you’re on the intel committee, or if you’re in leadership, you might have been briefed. I’m pretty good about attending meetings; I don’t remember being briefed,” said Sen. Johnny IsaksonJohn (Johnny) Hardy IsaksonOn The Money: Lawmakers wait for Trump verdict on border deal | Trump touts deal as offering B for security | McConnell presses Trump to sign off | National debt tops T | Watchdog details IRS shutdown woes Trump criticizes border wall deal: 'Can't say I'm happy' GOP senators offer praise for Klobuchar: 'She’s the whole package' MORE (R-Ga.). He said he voted for the FISA reauthorization and the Patriot Act but did not intend to grant authority to collect millions of phone records at a time.

“I never voted intentionally for any bill that would grant blanket [authority] to just monitor every phone call,” he said.

Leaders in the House did not directly criticize the administration, though Speaker John BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerBill Clinton jokes no one would skip Dingell's funeral: 'Only time' we could get the last word Left flexes muscle in immigration talks Former Ryan aide moves to K street MORE (R-Ohio) called on Obama to explain the program's use.

“There are public policy and civil liberty concerns among Americans today,” BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerBill Clinton jokes no one would skip Dingell's funeral: 'Only time' we could get the last word Left flexes muscle in immigration talks Former Ryan aide moves to K street MORE said. “I trust the president will explain to the American people why the administration considers this a critical tool in protecting our nation from the threats of a terrorist attack.” 

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she believes the NSA’s actions were consistent with the Patriot Act, but called for more congressional oversight of the program.

“The administration is obeying the law but the fact is we want more oversight,” she said at a press conference.

She said she learned of the court order just before news broke about it, and that she expected a further briefing soon.

Attorney General Eric HolderEric Himpton HolderOcasio-Cortez to be first guest on new Desus and Mero show Holder says he will make 2020 decision in coming weeks Holder: If Trump directed Cohen to lie, impeachment proceedings ‘must begin’ MORE faced some brief questioning on the program during his testimony Thursday in front of the Senate Appropriations subcommittee, but declined to get into specifics, saying only that members of Congress had been “fully briefed” and that the panel hearing was not “an appropriate setting” to discuss the issue.

Sen. Mark KirkMark Steven KirkThe global reality behind 'local' problems Dems vow swift action on gun reform next year This week: Trump heads to Capitol Hill MORE (R-Ill.) pressed Holder on whether any phone lines in the Capitol had been monitored in an attempt to gain political “leverage” over members of Congress.

"I don't think this is an appropriate setting for me to discuss that issue," Holder said.

“The correct answer is no,” Kirk shot back.

Jonathan Easley, Russell Berman and Molly K. Hooper contributed to this story.

This story was posted at 11:44 a.m. and updated at 2:37 p.m.