Trump marks deadly year in Chicago, hints at federal help

Trump marks deadly year in Chicago, hints at federal help
© Getty Images

President-elect Donald TrumpDonald TrumpPredictions of disaster for Democrats aren't guarantees of midterm failure A review of President Biden's first year on border policy  Hannity after Jan. 6 texted McEnany 'no more stolen election talk' in five-point plan for Trump MORE remarked on Monday that 2016 was one of the most violent years in Chicago history, hinting that federal assistance may be necessary to help end the bloodshed in the city.

"Chicago murder rate is record setting — 4,331 shooting victims with 762 murders in 2016,” Trump tweeted. “If Mayor can't do it he must ask for Federal help!”

ADVERTISEMENT

Chicago has been at the center of a national dialogue about gun violence. The nation's third largest city saw 762 homicides in 2016, which is the most in two decades and more than New York and Los Angeles combined.

Chicago also saw 1,100 more shooting incidents than it did in 2015, according to statistics released by the Chicago Police Department on Sunday.

The numbers are staggering, even for those following the steady news accounts of weekends ending with dozens of shootings and monthly death tolls that hadn't been seen in years.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s office responded to Trump’s tweet about the deadly year in the city later Monday.

“As the president-elect knows from his conversation with the mayor, we agree the federal government has a strong role to play in public safety,” the statement from Emanuel’s spokesman read.

“We are heartened he is taking this issue seriously and look forward to working with the new administration on these important efforts."

Emanuel met with the president-elect in December. Emanuel was a former chief of staff to President Obama and senior adviser to former President Bill ClintonWilliam (Bill) Jefferson ClintonPerdue proposes election police force in Georgia To boost economy and midterm outlook, Democrats must pass clean energy bill Could the coming 'red wave' election become a 'red tsunami'? MORE.

Paulina Firozi contributed 

Updated: 2:46 p.m.