Zuckerberg, Chan-funded scientists pen 'letter of concern' over Trump, misinformation

More than 140 scientists funded by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI), a philanthropic effort by Facebook CEO Mark ZuckerbergMark Elliot ZuckerbergPressure mounts on Facebook to rein in hate speech Facebook civil rights audit finds 'serious setbacks' Hillicon Valley: Pompeo floats TikTok ban | Civil rights groups slam Facebook after call | Election security funding included in proposal MORE and his wife Priscilla Chan focused on combating disease, penned a letter to the social media giant Saturday saying they should not be allowing President TrumpDonald John TrumpKimberly Guilfoyle reports being asymptomatic and 'feeling really pretty good' after COVID-19 diagnosis Biden says he will rejoin WHO on his first day in office Lincoln Project offers list of GOP senators who 'protect' Trump in new ad MORE to “spread both misinformation and incendiary statements.”

In the letter, the scientists claim Facebook’s tolerance for false information and incendiary language goes against the CZI’s mission to “build a healthier, just, and more inclusive future.”

The letter comes after dozens of former Facebook employees wrote to Zuckerberg panning him for allowing controversial posts from President Trump to stay up, specifically claiming that posts saying "when the looting starts, the shooting starts" is a "betrayal" of the social media platform's ideals. 


The scientists cited the same comments from the president, calling them “a clear statement of inciting violence,” which they say violates Facebook policies that are not being enforced.

Twitter flagged similar comments from the president on its platform, and have fact checked other posts he's shared.

The actions from Twitter led the president to file an executive order that would remove immunity that social media companies have under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act for content posted on their platforms by third parties.  

The scientists urged Zuckerberg to “consider stricter policies on misinformation and incendiary language that harms people or groups of people, especially in our current climate that is grappling with racial injustice.”

“While they have allowed dissemination of information across the globe, they also facilitate the spread of misinformation,” they said of social media sites.

“The spread of news that is not vetted for factual accuracy leads to confusion and a mistrust of experts.”