Democrats offer options for passing infrastructure, reconciliation bills

Democratic lawmakers on Sunday offered numerous options for pathways for the potential to pass the stalled infrastructure bill and reconciliation package after failing to bring either key measures of the Biden administration to a vote in the House last week.

Some lawmakers said they were confident that they would be able to pass both measures while others, including some progressives who refused to vote for the bipartisan bill unless they could pass the larger reconciliation package first, suggested they'd be open to a smaller price tag or a shorter amount of years of funding social programs. House Democrats failed to bring either bill up for a vote last week as moderate lawmakers like Sens. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinSanders on Medicare expansion in spending package: 'Its not coming out' Glasgow summit raises stakes for Biden deal Sunday shows preview: CDC signs off on 'mix and match' vaccine boosters MORE (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaSunday shows preview: CDC signs off on 'mix and match' vaccine boosters Buttigieg aims to use Tucker Carlson flap to spotlight paternity leave Biden injects new momentum into filibuster fight MORE (D-Ariz.) refused to budge from their demands of a lowered reconciliation package.

"We are going to deliver both bills," leader of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) said while appearing on CNN's "State of the Union." Jayapal said Manchin's request for a pared-back reconciliation bill of $1.5 trillion was "too small to get our priorities in," though she could not give an exact number.


Senior White House adviser Cedric RichmondCedric RichmondBiden to meet with business leaders amid debt ceiling pressure campaign on GOP Bottom line The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden, Democrats to scale back agenda MORE echoed that sentiment, telling "Fox News Sunday" host Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceChris Wallace on Colin Powell: He was 'very protective' of his reputation Liz Cheney is the Margaret Chase Smith of our time Sunday shows - Buttigieg warns supply chain issues could stretch to next year MORE that President BidenJoe BidenGrant Woods, longtime friend of McCain and former Arizona AG, dies at 67 Sanders on Medicare expansion in spending package: 'Its not coming out' Glasgow summit raises stakes for Biden deal MORE "wants both bills and he expects to get both bills." 

Both Jayapal and Richmond said they were focused more on the actual delivery of the bills, with Richmond, a former congressman from Louisiana, saying the White House was "not concerned with process." 

"What we've said from the beginning is that it's never been about the price tag. It's about what we want to deliver," Jayapal said. "The critical thing is let's get our priorities in and then we will figure out the actual cost."

However, fellow progressive lawmaker Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersSanders on Medicare expansion in spending package: 'Its not coming out' Briahna Joy Gray: Biden must keep progressive promises or risk losing midterms Overnight Health Care — Presented by Carequest — Study finds Pfizer vaccine almost 91 percent effective for 5 to 11 year olds MORE (I-Vt.) appeared to push back against suggestions of reducing the price of the $3.5 trillion reconciliation package.

Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press," Sanders said it was not his "understanding" that Biden had suggested lowering the size of the reconciliation package.

"What he said is there's going to have to be give and take on both sides. I'm not clear that he did bring forth a specific number," said Sanders.

Senate Majority Whip Dick DurbinDick DurbinManchin: Negotiators to miss Friday target for deal on reconciliation bill Democrats look for plan B on filibuster The Memo: Cuts to big bill vex Democrats MORE (D-Ill.) signaled his continued support for the whole $3.5 trillion bill, though he conceded he was "realist" when it comes to the ongoing negotiations.

"Let me tell you at the outset I support the $3.5 trillion. I believe that the elements of it have been stated over and over again. They're good for this country and they're needed by families and by our nation," said Durbin.

The Illinois senator did express some frustration at the negotiations.

"I can't tell you how many times I've been asked 'what's your number?' " said Durbin. "Every vote counts when it comes to getting to this majority, and concessions will be made. We're certain of that."


Progressive Reps. Ro KhannaRohit (Ro) KhannaSunday shows preview: CDC signs off on 'mix and match' vaccine boosters Democrats brush off risks of paring down spending package Proposals to reform supports for parents face chopping block MORE (D-Calif.) and Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezHouse progressives call on Biden to end all new fossil fuel permitting Schumer endorses democratic socialist India Walton in Buffalo mayor's race Toomey takes aim at Schumer's spending windfall for NYC public housing MORE (D-N.Y.) both said shortening the years of funding provided for some programs could be a feasible option for compromising on the reconciliation bill.

“I think that one of the ideas that's out there is fully fund what we can fully fund, but maybe instead of doing it for 10 years, you fully fund it for five years," Ocasio-Cortez said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

Khanna said sunset provisions could be one way that a compromise could be reached. He expressed optimism that Biden would be able to negotiate a compromise.

"The president is an honest broker. He's going to bring all the stakeholders together, and I trust his judgment to get a compromise," Khanna told Wallace.