GOP threatens weekend work on judicial nominees

GOP threatens weekend work on judicial nominees
© Getty Images

Republicans are digging in ahead of a looming battle over President Trump's judicial nominees. 

Senate GOP leadership wants to clear four picks this week for the circuit courts — which are second in line to the Supreme Court — amid pressure from conservatives to pick up the pace. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellWhat the Democrats should be doing to reach true bipartisanship Democrats mull overhaul of sweeping election bill McConnell seeks to divide and conquer Democrats MORE (R-Ky.) warned that Republicans would confirm all of the nominees, even if it meant keeping lawmakers in town through a rare weekend session. 

“We'll confirm all of them this week no matter how long it takes,” McConnell said from the Senate floor. 

Senate Majority Whip John CornynJohn CornynRising crime rejuvenates gun control debate on campaign trail Bipartisan lawmakers want Biden to take tougher action on Nicaragua Bipartisan Senate group announces infrastructure deal MORE (R-Texas) echoed that the circuit court positions were important enough to “stay in session over the weekend or night.”

In addition to a final vote on Trevor McFadden to be United States district judge for the District of Columbia, McConnell has teed up four circuit court picks: Amy Barrett to be U.S. circuit judge for the 7th Circuit, Joan Larsen to be U.S. circuit judge for the 6th Circuit, Allison Eid to be U.S. circuit judge for the 10th Circuit and Stephan's Bibas to be U.S. circuit judge for the 3rd Circuit.

Republicans and outside groups rallied around Barrett's nomination during a press conference in the Capitol on Monday.

Democrats on the Judiciary Committee questioned Barrett over her Catholicism during her confirmation hearing, asking whether her religious beliefs would impact rulings on controversial issues including abortion. 

Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinProgressives want to tighten screws beyond Manchin and Sinema 'If this thing qualifies, I'm toast': An oral history of the Gray Davis recall in California The big myths about recall elections MORE (Calif.), the top Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told Barrett that every religion has a “dogma” and "the dogma lives loudly within you." 

Meanwhile, Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinThe tale of the last bipartisan unicorns Ex-DOJ official Rosenstein says he was not aware of subpoena targeting Democrats: report Trump DOJ demanded metadata on 73 phone numbers and 36 email addresses, Apple says MORE (D-Ill.) asked Barrett if she considers herself an “orthodox Catholic.”

Barrett co-wrote a paper as a law student exploring whether a Catholic judge should recuse themselves from a death penalty case. 

GOP senators hit back at those comments on Monday, with Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyHouse unveils antitrust package to rein in tech giants Iowa governor questions lack of notice on migrant children flights to Des Moines Senate crafts Pelosi alternative on drug prices MORE (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, calling the Democratic questions “entirely inappropriate.”

“My Democratic colleagues insisted on engaging in ugly anti-Catholic rhetoric,” he said.

Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzBiden tries to erase Trump's 'America First' on world stage Cotton, Pentagon chief tangle over diversity training in military GOP senators press Justice Department to compare protest arrests to Capitol riot MORE (R-Texas) called Barrett's nomination a test for the Senate and if Democrats would support “establishing an unconstitutional religious test.”

“If the message of Democrats is Catholics need not apply ... then that is a sad, sad testament to where this body is," he added. 

With Republicans struggling to score political and legislative wins despite having the first unified GOP government in a decade, they're increasingly focusing on judicial nominations as a way to secure a long-term legacy. 

Asked about GOP accomplishments this year, McConnell frequently points to Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation. He also announced in 2016 that Republicans would not give a hearing or a vote to whomever then-President Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaEnding the same-sex marriage wars Arizona election audit draws Republican tourists Biden tries to erase Trump's 'America First' on world stage MORE nominated to fill the late Antonin Scalia's seat. 

Trump currently has 149 vacancies in the federal judiciary to fill, with nominations currently made for 50 of those spots.  
Conservative, and allied outside groups, have complained that the Senate isn't moving fast enough to confirm nominees and pressured McConnell to either curb the amount of time required or keep the Senate in around the block. 

The Judicial Crisis Network had been prepared to target McConnell specifically, urging the Kentucky Republican to speed up the chamber’s consideration of Trump’s judicial nominees. But the group said earlier this month that it was holding off after outreach from McConnell’s office.

Carrie Severino, JCN's chief counsel and policy director, lauded McConnell's "commitment to ensuring the confirmation of all of President Trump’s outstanding nominees” after he set up this week's slate of votes.

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerIt's not just Manchin: No electoral mandate stalls Democrats' leftist agenda DOJ to probe Trump-era subpoenas of lawmaker records Democrats demand Barr, Sessions testify on Apple data subpoenas MORE (D-N.Y.) questioned McConnell's floor schedule on Monday calling it the “first time in my memory that the Senate is being asked to process four circuit court judges in a single week.” 

“The Leader has chosen to try to accomplish through the courts what Republicans have been unable to achieve through the legislative process,” Schumer added, questioning rhetorically what was driving the schedule. 

Senate Democrats nixed the 60-vote filibuster for lower-court nominees in 2013, meaning they can't block any of Trump's picks on their own.

But they can use the Senate's rulebook to drag out debate time. If they force the full 30 hours of debate for each nomination the Senate could be forced to stay in through the weekend or kick some of the votes to next week. 

Democrats argue that many of Trump's picks are either unqualified or too ideologically extreme. But they're also under growing pressure from their base, and outside progressive groups, to attempt to block the president's picks. 

A coalition of progressive groups — NARAL, Daily Kos, MoveOn, Every Voice, Democracy for America, Progressive Change Campaign Committee — urged McConnell and Schumer to stop processing Trump's nominations in the wake of special counsel Robert Mueller's announcement of charges against former Trump campaign staff on Monday. 

“With this legal storm now forming directly over the White House and high-ranking Trump associates, the United States Senate should immediately halt all action on all lifetime appointments to the federal bench until the investigation is complete,” the groups said. 

They added that it is “far past time that the Senate stop being complicit as Trump and his associates do tremendous damage to our nation and, according to Special Counsel, break the law.”