Senate Dem hints Trump Hotel may be behind president’s ‘obsession’ to renovate FBI headquarters
Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) on Monday hinted that the location of Trump International Hotel in Washington, D.C., could explain President Trump’s “obsession” with renovating the FBI headquarters instead of relocating it.
Van Hollen speculated on Twitter that a new hotel built on the current site of the FBI headquarters would cut into the profits of the Trump property, which is also located on Pennsylvania Avenue NW.
“Trump has an obsession with renovating the FBI HQ at its current location—despite recommendations to find a more secure location,” the Maryland Democrat said. “Could it be a new hotel there would eat into the profits of the nearby Trump Hotel? We should put the security of FBI before Trump’s pocketbook!”
Trump has an obsession with renovating the FBI HQ at its current location—despite recommendations to find a more secure location. Could it be a new hotel there would eat into the profits of the nearby Trump Hotel? We should put the security of FBI before Trump’s pocketbook! https://t.co/AFJ7wmPVLT
— Chris Van Hollen (@ChrisVanHollen) July 30, 2018
Axios reported on Sunday that Trump is heavily involved in planning a revamp for the FBI headquarters, which would be an abnormal move for a sitting president. He reportedly often goes on rants about the current building, calling it the one “ugliest buildings in the city,” but refuses all recommendations to move its location.
“This reporting makes clear that President Trump is deeply involved in the decision to keep the FBI headquarters at its current location,” Van Hollen said in a statement to The Hill. “This flies in the face of a decade of recommendations from both the FBI and the [General Services Administration] that the headquarters needs to move to a safer, unified, suburban campus.”
“There is no question that the President stands to gain financially by keeping the FBI in its existing building and blocking any competition for the Trump Hotel from being developed there,” Van Hollen added.
Van Hollen in February pressed the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on this issue, demanding they explain why the J. Edgar Hoover Building will stay at its current address “despite failing to meet nearly every security requirement as outlined by the FBI and GSA for more than a decade,” according to a statement at the time.
The Hill has removed its comment section, as there are many other forums for readers to participate in the conversation. We invite you to join the discussion on Facebook and Twitter.