2020 hopefuls skeptical of criminal justice deal with Trump

2020 hopefuls skeptical of criminal justice deal with Trump
© Greg Nash

Sens. Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerCoast Guard lieutenant arrested, accused of planning domestic terrorism Hillicon Valley: Microsoft reveals new Russian hack attempts | Google failed to disclose hidden microphone | Booker makes late HQ2 bid | Conservative group targets Ocasio-Cortez over Amazon Jussie Smollett officially a suspect in alleged Chicago attack MORE (D-N.J.) and Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisKamala Harris criticized by Jamaican father over marijuana joke Harris adds key Clinton aide, women of color to 2020 campaign: report Coast Guard lieutenant arrested, accused of planning domestic terrorism MORE (D-Calif.) are not responding warmly to overtures from the White House and congressional Republicans on a possible criminal justice reform deal, a sign that 2020 presidential politics could prove a hurdle to legislation.

As outspoken advocates of criminal justice reform and the only two African-American members of the Senate Democratic Conference, Booker and Harris say they are not eager to strike a deal with President TrumpDonald John TrumpJustice Department preparing for Mueller report as soon as next week: reports Smollett lawyers declare 'Empire' star innocent Pelosi asks members to support resolution against emergency declaration MORE that they view as a watered-down version of one reached with Senate Republicans.

Both Democrats, who are considered top-tier contenders to become their party's nominee going up against Trump in 2020, insist they will review any measure that the president might endorse. But striking a deal on criminal justice reform that proves unpopular with the party’s base could prove costly.

ADVERTISEMENT

GOP negotiators predict that the pair will likely come out against a deal, while Republicans say Senate Democratic Whip Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinDurbin: Trump pressuring acting AG in Cohen probe is 'no surprise' Durbin after reading Green New Deal: 'What in the heck is this?' Sanders: 'Not crazy' about nixing the Senate filibuster MORE (Ill.) has been more active in bipartisan talks and is seen as more receptive to a compromise. 

“We haven’t heard from Cory yet about taking meetings. He’s been more in the obstruction category,” said a Republican negotiator. “Durbin’s actually been working with us. Booker and Harris, they have shown no interest in engaging even though there’s a possibility here to help a lot of people.”

A second Republican negotiator confirmed that account.

“I’m kind of getting the feeling that Durbin is realistic enough to know that things get done here in smaller steps,” the source said. “It may be a tough sell for Booker.”

The House passed a prison reform bill earlier this year, but liberal activists quickly came out against the bill. Still, any compromise that Trump is likely to sign this year would be largely based on that legislation, GOP sources say. 

Booker — a co-sponsor of the Senate’s bipartisan prison and sentencing reform, the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act — denied the GOP claim that he’s not engaged in the negotiations but noted that he has already compromised with Republicans on criminal justice reform legislation.

"The bipartisan bill that we passed out, which was negotiated extensively, was the compromises that I wanted to make," Booker told The Hill. "For me to give up on something that was negotiated. I find it hard to think that would cut mustard for me."

"I'm still open to seeing what would happen, but remember we fought really hard for what was in that bill and to have it be vacated to get an even more watered-down one is concerning to me," he added. 

Harris, who is also a co-sponsor of the legislation, said she hasn’t yet reviewed the latest version of compromise legislation that a group of Republicans presented to Trump right before the August recess. But she indicated a strong preference for the Senate legislation.

"I'll have to take a look at it. I do have some concerns about bifurcating. I think it was a really well done comprehensive bill in its original form," she said Thursday.

The nation’s high incarceration rate, especially affecting black males, could be a focal point for Democratic candidates gearing up for the 2020 presidential primary.

While it has garnered less attention than other hot-button issues such as economic inequality and health care, it popped up at various times throughout the 2016 election.

Michelle Alexander, a human rights advocate, argued in The Nation magazine in 2016 that then-Democratic nominee Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonFBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it Harris adds key Clinton aide, women of color to 2020 campaign: report Democrats more likely Trump's foil, than to foil Trump MORE didn’t deserve the black vote because her husband as president "presided over the largest increase in federal and state prison inmates of any president in American history."

She noted that former President Clinton signed into law a crime bill that mandated life sentences for some three-time offenders and backed the 100-1 sentencing disparity for crack- versus powder cocaine-related offenses.

Liberal activists are urging lawmakers to take action on criminal justice reform, but have largely opposed the House-passed legislation and have pushed for something that in their view has more teeth.

For example, the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, an influential advocacy group on the left, urged lawmakers to vote against the House bill, calling it “misguided” and citing several “grave concerns.”

Hilary Shelton, the Washington bureau director of the NAACP, argued in a May memo that the House bill “may, in fact, result in some people staying in prison longer and it may exacerbate the racial and ethnic disparities of those who are incarcerated.”

A group of GOP senators including Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyOvernight Health Care — Presented by National Taxpayers Union — Drug pricing fight centers on insulin | Florida governor working with Trump to import cheaper drugs | Dems blast proposed ObamaCare changes Drug pricing fight centers on insulin On The Money: Smaller tax refunds put GOP on defensive | Dems question IRS on new tax forms | Warren rolls out universal child care proposal | Illinois governor signs bill for minimum wage MORE (Iowa), Mike LeeMichael (Mike) Shumway LeeThe Hill's 12:30 Report: Trump escalates fight with NY Times The 10 GOP senators who may break with Trump on emergency Congress closer to forcing Trump’s hand on Saudi support MORE (Utah), Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamFBI’s top lawyer believed Hillary Clinton should face charges, but was talked out of it Overnight Defense: Graham clashed with Pentagon chief over Syria | Talk grows that Trump will fire Coats | Coast Guard officer accused of domestic terrorism plot Graham cursed at acting DOD chief, declaring himself his 'adversary' MORE (S.C.) and Tim ScottTimothy (Tim) Eugene ScottSenate approves border bill that prevents shutdown Senate passes bill to make lynching a federal crime Partnerships paving the way to sustain and support Historically Black Colleges and Universities MORE (S.C.), support a proposal that would combine with House-passed prison reform bill, the First Step Act, with four sentencing reform provisions from the bipartisan Senate bill.

A senior White House official earlier this month described the president as “positively inclined” toward the combined House and Senate bills.

But Booker this week described the House-passed prison reform bill as something that “sets us backward.”

“That bill alone, to me, I think pushes us back. It doesn’t even take a step forward,” he said.

The compromise that GOP senators discussed with Trump earlier this month would make some changes to the House bill that Booker described as “good corrections,” but they may not go far enough.

Booker emphasized this week that he’s letting Durbin take the lead in talking to Republican colleagues.

"Durbin and I have been deep up in this since the very beginning. He and I talk on a regular basis about the details about what he's doing when he's in the room,” he said.

Harris said she hasn’t looked at the emerging legislation “since I last had meetings and talked about it about a month ago.”