SPONSORED:

Dems demand access to interpreters at Trump's meetings with Putin

Dems demand access to interpreters at Trump's meetings with Putin
© Getty Images

A pair of key Senate Democrats are demanding access to interpreters present for all of President TrumpDonald TrumpDOJ asks Supreme Court to revive Boston Marathon bomber death sentence, in break with Biden vow Biden looking to build momentum for Putin meeting DOJ tells media execs that reporters were not targets of investigations MORE's meetings with Russian President Vladimir Putin since he took office.

Sens. Bob MenendezRobert (Bob) MenendezThe Hill's Morning Report - Biden-Putin meeting to dominate the week Sanders drops bid to block Biden's Israel arms sale Sanders push to block arms sale to Israel doomed in Senate MORE (D-N.J.) and Jack ReedJack ReedOvernight Defense: Pentagon details military construction projects getting .2B restored from wall funds | Biden chooses former commander to lead Navy | Bill seeks to boost visa program for Afghans who helped US Biden taps tech CEO, former destroyer commander to lead Navy Top general: Military justice overhaul proposed by Gillibrand 'requires some detailed study' MORE (D-R.I.), the ranking members of the Senate Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees, respectively, sent a letter to Trump on Wednesday requesting that the interpreters be made available for congressional interviews.

“In light of the continuing level of secrecy shrouding your interactions with the Russian leader, we insist that the interpreters for these interactions, especially the individual who interpreted for your meeting with President Putin in Helsinki, be made immediately available for interviews with the relevant committees in Congress,” they wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Hill.

The letter comes as the White House defends itself against renewed scrutiny of Trump’s possible ties to Moscow. 

The Washington Post reported last week that Trump concealed details about encounters with Putin from officials in his administration on multiple occasions and confiscated notes on one occasion from his own interpreter, directing him not to discuss the meeting with others. 

The New York Times also reported last week that Trump’s abrupt firing of former FBI Director James ComeyJames Brien ComeyMystery surrounds Justice's pledge on journalist records NYT publisher: DOJ phone records seizure a 'dangerous incursion' on press freedom Trump DOJ seized phone records of New York Times reporters MORE in 2017 caused such concern among law enforcement that officials began probing if Trump was secretly carrying out anti-American agendas on behalf of Russia.

“Your insistence on secrecy related to these interactions, even with your own staff, is alarming, unprecedented, and could be in violation of the Presidential Records Act and Federal Records Act,” Menendez and Reed told Trump in their letter Wednesday.

“[W]e believe it to be in the national security interests of the United States that any record of these conversations be preserved and immediately provided to Congress.” 

The White House has regularly argued that Trump has taken a tougher stance on Russia than some of his predecessors.

The Trump administration has imposed sanctions on Kremlin officials and suggested it may withdraw from a landmark nuclear pact.

But the president has often adopted flattering rhetoric toward Putin, further alarming some lawmakers on Capitol Hill amid probes into ties between his campaign and Russia in 2016.

The president has maintained there was no collusion during the 2016 race and slammed special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE’s investigation into such claims as a “witch hunt.”

-Updated 7:24 p.m.