Lawmakers say Trump’s infrastructure vision lacks political momentum

Lawmakers say Trump’s infrastructure vision lacks political momentum
© Getty Images

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle said Tuesday that there is little political momentum in Congress for the significant infrastructure investment President TrumpDonald John TrumpHow to stand out in the crowd: Kirsten Gillibrand needs to find her niche Countdown clock is on for Mueller conclusions Omar: White supremacist attacks are rising because Trump publicly says 'Islam hates us' MORE called for in his State of the Union address.

Trump declared “both parties should be able to unite for a great rebuilding of America’s crumbling infrastructure,” a remark that was met mostly with shrugs.

Senators said while there’s support for rebuilding roads, bridges and other infrastructure, there’s far from any consensus on how to pay for it when the Congressional Budget Office projects that the federal deficit will grow to $897 billion in 2019.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it’s obvious that a lot of our infrastructure is crumbling and needs repairs, but how do you fund it when you’re spending on other things as well?" said Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonScott Walker considering running for Wisconsin governor or Senate: report GOP moves to rein in president's emergency powers The Hill's 12:30 Report: O'Rourke jumps into 2020 fray MORE (R-Wis.). "If you’re ever going to borrow money for something it should be for a capital good, but when you’re borrowing so much money … it makes it pretty challenging.”

Rebuilding the nation’s infrastructure was a pillar of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, and one that he highlighted early in his term, saying Democrats and the White House could work together on the issue.

But optimism for a striking a grand deal is rapidly fading. 

Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinRomney helps GOP look for new path on climate change Manchin says he won't support LGBTQ protection bill as written Senators offer bipartisan bill to fix 'retail glitch' in GOP tax law MORE (W.Va.), a centrist Democrat from a state Trump won overwhelmingly in 2016, said the president needs to offer a viable proposal to pay for an infrastructure package.

“I didn’t see the money. I’d love to. I think everyone wants to do one. Everyone knows we need one but I didn’t see no money. How is it funded? Funding is the problem there,” he said.

Sen. Doug Jones (Ala.), another Democratic centrist, called the lack of consensus on how to pay for infrastructure "a problem."

"The goal of an infrastructure [package] is as bipartisan as they come, but the problem that we got now is how to pay for it," he said, adding that the 2017 GOP tax law and growing deficits make it "kind of tough, especially when you're asking for more money for the military and all the nondefense funding."

He said "perhaps there's a way" to move smaller "strategic" projects through Congress.

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyFive takeaways from Trump's budget Overnight Health Care — Presented by PCMA — Trump unveils 2020 budget | Calls for cuts to NIH | Proposes user fees on e-cigs | Azar heads to Capitol to defend blueprint | Key drug price bill gets hearing this week Trump's emergency declaration looms over Pentagon funding fight MORE (R-Ala.) said it’s up to the House Ways and Means Committee to get the ball rolling, since revenue-raising measures are supposed to originate in the lower chamber.

“Infrastructure is money,” he said. “You’re talking about more money. When you talk about infrastructure, you’re talking about more gas tax, realistically."

Trump told lawmakers on Tuesday night that taking no action on infrastructure “is not an option.”

“I am eager to work with you on legislation to deliver new and important infrastructure investment, including investments in the cutting edge industries of the future,” he said. "This is a necessity.”

Sen. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanTrump faces political risks in fight over GM plant GOP moves to rein in president's emergency powers The 25 Republicans who defied Trump on emergency declaration MORE (R-Ohio), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said Congress could move a smaller-scale proposal such as a bipartisan bill to address the National Park Service maintenance backlog, a measure that the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee advanced during the previous Congress.

“It’s a $6 billion infrastructure bill. It’s not everything that people want, but I always thought it could be part of the broader infrastructure bill where you use tax incentives like the private activity bonds we retained in the tax bill to leverage federal dollars,” he said.

Portman said it would be funded by offshore oil and gas revenues, adding that he has talked with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellLessons from the 1999 U.S. military intervention in Kosovo Five things to watch as AIPAC conference kicks off Romney helps GOP look for new path on climate change MORE (R-Ky.) about putting the legislation on the floor schedule.