GOP braces for showdown on wall emergency with Trump

Congress is on a collision course with President TrumpDonald John TrumpSupreme Court comes to Trump's aid on immigration Trump is failing on trade policy Trump holds call with Netanyahu to discuss possible US-Israel defense treaty MORE over his national emergency declaration, setting the stage for the first veto of his administration.

A showdown appears all but inevitable with momentum building behind a resolution of disapproval, which clinched the votes needed to pass over the weekend and could pick up several additional Republican supporters ahead of a vote expected to take place in a matter of days.

Top Republicans signaled on Monday that they are resigned to it passing the GOP-controlled Senate, an embarrassing setback for Trump that will force him to use his first veto if he’s going to defeat the backlash from Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellSupreme Court comes to Trump's aid on immigration GOP group's ad calls on Graham to push for election security: 'Are you still trying?' Harris keeps up 'little dude' attack on Trump after debate MORE (R-Ky.) told reporters that it’s “clear” the resolution of disapproval will pass the Senate but predicted that it would die in the House, where a vote last week fell short of the two-thirds needed to override a veto.

“I think what is clear in the Senate is that there will be enough votes to pass the resolution of disapproval, which will then be vetoed by the president and then in all likelihood the veto will be upheld in the House,” McConnell said at a press conference in Kentucky.

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynThe Hill's Morning Report — Biden steadies in third debate as top tier remains the same Congress set to ignore Trump's wall request in stopgap measure Cruz: Texas will be 'hotly contested' in 2020 MORE (R-Texas), an adviser to McConnell, added that he thought the vote would be “close” but that the outcome was “predictable.”

And Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGOP group's ad calls on Graham to push for election security: 'Are you still trying?' Cruz to oppose Trump appeals court pick Senators pressure Trump to help end humanitarian crisis in Kashmir MORE (R-S.C.), a close ally of Trump’s, predicted that the president wouldn’t be actively whipping senators since the veto override was likely to fail in the House.

“I don’t think he’s calling anybody,” Graham said.

The Senate is set to vote on the resolution of disapproval before they leave town for a weeklong recess on March 15. All 47 members of the Democratic Caucus are expected to support it, and four Republicans have now offered their public backing, providing a majority.

Sen. Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulPaul calls into Wyoming TV station to talk Cheney feud Liz Cheney and Rand Paul extend war of words Marijuana industry donations to lawmakers surge in 2019: analysis MORE (R-Ky.), who has cultivated a friendship with Trump despite being a perennial thorn for leadership, became the fourth Republican to say he will side with Democrats over the weekend, warning that Trump’s emergency declaration contradicted “the will of Congress.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“I cannot support the use of emergency powers to get more funding, so I will be voting to disapprove of his declaration when it comes before the Senate,” he wrote in a Fox News op-ed.

In addition to Paul, GOP Sens. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsHouse passes bill to begin scenic byways renaissance Senators say Trump open to expanding background checks Democrats threaten to withhold defense votes over wall MORE (Maine), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiOvernight Energy: Trump administration to repeal waterway protections| House votes to block drilling in Arctic refuge| Administration takes key step to open Alaskan refuge to drilling by end of year Overnight Health Care: Juul's lobbying efforts fall short as Trump moves to ban flavored e-cigarettes | Facebook removes fact check from anti-abortion video after criticism | Poll: Most Democrats want presidential candidate who would build on ObamaCare Trump administration takes key step to open Alaskan wildlife refuge to drilling by end of year MORE (Alaska) and Thom TillisThomas (Thom) Roland TillisTillis places big ad buy as he faces wealthy GOP challenger North Carolina race raises 2020 red flags for Republicans, Democrats This week: Congress returns for first time since mass shootings MORE (N.C.) have said they will support a resolution of disapproval.

Roughly a dozen Republican senators remain on the fence about Trump’s emergency declaration. Underscoring the breadth of concern, the swath of undecided senators includes libertarian-leaning Republicans, moderates and typical McConnell and Trump allies.

Sen. James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeIs the Senate ready to protect American interests in space? Republicans grumble over Trump shifting military funds to wall Gun debate to shape 2020 races MORE (R-Okla.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said Monday that the emergency declaration is “dead in the water” in the Senate.

“I may vote against it because we don’t know for sure how that’s going to affect the military,” Inhofe told KRMG, an Oklahoma radio station, on Monday.

Trump announced that he would declare a national emergency to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall after Congress passed a funding bill that included $1.375 billion for physical barriers, well below the $5.7 billion the president requested.

He’s hoping to pull together roughly $8 billion for the wall by combining the money from Congress with executive actions and using the national emergency to reshuffle military construction funding.

Several undecided Republican senators said Monday that they hadn’t heard from the administration about the Senate’s vote.

“Maybe they’re considering it, hopefully,” said Sen. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderLiberal group urges Senate panel to vote against Scalia as Labor secretary Suburban anxiety drives GOP on guns Push on 'surprise' medical bills hits new roadblocks MORE (R-Tenn.), adding that he hadn’t heard back from the White House about his proposal calling on Trump to back down from his emergency declaration.

Sen. Johnny IsaksonJohnny IsaksonGOP senator presses VA after veteran reportedly bitten by ants at nursing home GOP buys JonOssoff.com after Democrat launches Georgia Senate bid Jon Ossoff launching Georgia Senate campaign MORE (R-Ga.), another undecided senator, added that the White House had not reached out about how he would vote. Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest Grassley'Mike Pounce' trends on Twitter after Trump slip at GOP retreat Cruz warns GOP support for expanded background checks could help elect Warren president Lawmakers applaud Trump's ban on flavored e-cigarettes MORE (Iowa), a member of GOP leadership who also hasn’t heard from Trump, defended the administration by noting they had sent Vice President Pence to meet with Republicans.

“They’re very much pushing it, or they wouldn’t be up here talking to the caucus,” said Grassley, who has described himself as “leaning no” on the resolution.

Trump’s emergency has placed Republicans in an untenable political bind. The party has been wary of breaking with Trump on border security, which has emerged as a lightning rod among the party’s base. But they’ve also been frank about their concerns that Trump is setting up a legal precedent a future Democratic president could use to jam through policies Republicans are opposed to.

McConnell, who is up for reelection in 2020, illustrated the political tightrope Monday by saying that while he was supporting Trump’s emergency declaration, he had also unsuccessfully lobbied the president against choosing the controversial step.

McConnell told reporters that he was “hoping the president would not take the national emergency route.”

“Yeah, I am, that’s one reason I argued, obviously without success, to the president that he not take this route,” McConnell added, asked if he was concerned about a future Democratic president using the precedent.

Republicans are trying to work through if they can make changes to the resolution of disapproval to make it more palatable to their caucus, but are basically in uncharted territory. Lawmakers previously threatened to challenge former President George W. Bush’s 2005 emergency declaration, but he backed down.

McConnell noted Monday that they are consulting the parliamentarian.

“It’s never been done before,” McConnell said. “We’ve been looking and talking … about what options there are if any.”

Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntGOP group's ad calls on Graham to push for election security: 'Are you still trying?' Exclusive: Kushner tells GOP it needs to unify behind immigration plan The Hill's Morning Report - Can Trump save GOP in North Carolina special election? MORE (Mo.), a member of GOP leadership, added that the resolution is “so narrow that I don’t think that’s a realistic possibility.”

“We’re not the final vote yet,” Blunt added. “I’d still like to see the president take another course if he could.”