Dems face pressure from left to step up court fight on 'blue slips'   

Democrats are brushing off calls from the left to play hardball after Republicans invoked the “nuclear option” to speed up most of President TrumpDonald John TrumpHealth insurers Cigna, Humana waive out-of-pocket costs for coronavirus treatment Puerto Rico needs more federal help to combat COVID-19 Fauci says April 30 extension is 'a wise and prudent decision' MORE’s nominees. 

The move to reduce how long it takes to confirm hundreds of picks sparked a flurry of angry speeches from Democrats who characterized the move as a “sad day” for the Senate. 

The changes marked the second and third time Republicans have gone nuclear since Trump’s election, leaving progressive groups fuming over Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMnuchin emerges as key asset in Trump's war against coronavirus Louisiana Republican: People upset at 'spending porn on pet projects' in latest stimulus bill Coronavirus pushes GOP's Biden-Burisma probe to back burner MORE’s (R-Ky.) tactics and annoyed at what they see as a lack of a response from Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s really frustrating to watch Democrats sort of acknowledge that this is a Republican power grab, which of course it is, and then not commit to doing anything,” said Chris Kang, the chief counsel for Demand Justice. 

Outside groups have pressured Democrats to do more to make life difficult for Senate Republicans in response to the rule changes. 

In one sign of potential behind-the-scenes pushback, Republicans are delaying the first vote of the week until Tuesday even though McConnell teed up six nominations on Thursday. Republicans normally have a Monday evening vote, but that would require sign off from Democrats to speed up the first nomination.

But Democrats also reached a deal with Republicans to hold a final vote on a district judge nominee on Thursday morning, who was ultimately supported by more than a dozen Democratic senators. If Democrats had wanted to, they could have forced Republicans to stay later on Wednesday night to do the vote.

The relatively smooth proceedings didn’t go unnoticed by Republicans. An aide for McConnell asked reporters to “thank the Democrats on your way out tonight for not forcing a bunch of votes.” 

Democratic senators also are balking over calls to block the confirmation of district court judges from their own states by refusing to return “blue slips,” a sheet of paper that indicates if they support a nomination.

Republicans have confirmed judges to more powerful circuit courts without getting a blue slip from either home-state senator, a first for the Senate that has angered Democrats. 

But Democrats aren't willing to block district court nominees since blue slips are being honored in that process, giving them input on who the White House nominates. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGraham: Pelosi comment on Trump is 'most shameful, disgusting statement by any politician in modern history' Sunday shows preview: Lawmakers, state governors talk coronavirus, stimulus package and resources as pandemic rages on Campaigns pivot toward health awareness as races sidelined by coronavirus MORE (R-S.C.) says he will honor the blue slip for lower-level district judges, whose jurisdiction is contained wholly within one state and whose rulings can be overruled at the appeals level. 

Kang argued that by refusing to return blue slips on district court judges, Democrats could try to force Republicans back to the negotiating table on how the Senate handles circuit court nominations. At a minimum, they could keep additional Trump nominees from getting confirmed. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It could actually force the Trump administration to change its behavior or not fill these vacancies,” Kang said. “If Democrats withheld their blue slips for these 70 district court vacancies and refused to let Trump fill them, Republicans would have to come back to the table with some response.” 

But Sen. Christopher CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsSenate includes 0M for mail-in voting in coronavirus spending deal Hillicon Valley: Facebook reports huge spike in usage during pandemic | Democrats push for mail-in voting funds in coronavirus stimulus | Trump delays deadline to acquire REAL ID Democrats press for more stimulus funding to boost mail-in voting MORE (D-Del.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, said such a proposal would be self-defeating.

“So hypothetically their great proposal is that we will hold vacant district court judgeships in our state?” he asked. “How does this make any sense?” 

Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinLegal immigrants at risk of losing status during coronavirus pandemic Senate rejects GOP attempt to change unemployment benefits in coronavirus stimulus bill Senators pen op-ed calling for remote voting amid coronavirus pandemic MORE (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, warned the tactic “makes no sense” if Democrats would be blocking judges they would otherwise support. 

Sen. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineStudents with disabilities could lose with COVID-19 stimulus package Coronavirus pushes GOP's Biden-Burisma probe to back burner Senate on cusp of coronavirus stimulus deal after agreements in key areas MORE (D-Va.) held up his hands when asked about the suggestion. 

Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseOvernight Energy: Coronavirus package punts on environmental fights | Court sides with tribes in Dakota Access Pipeline case | Trump officials walk away from ethanol court fight Coronavirus package punts on environmental fights Overnight Energy: House stimulus aims to stem airline pollution | Environmental measures become sticking point in Senate talks | Progressives propose T 'green stimulus' MORE (D-R.I.), who like Durbin is a member of the Judiciary Committee, also criticized the strategy.

“If I approve of a judge and my blue slip has been honored and I feel I’ve had an adequate voice, we’ve got a good judge, I don’t see why we shouldn’t have them appointed,” he said. 

Republicans under Trump in February confirmed a circuit nominee for the first time without support from home state senators when they sent Eric Miller to the 9th Circuit. Neither Democratic senator from Washington provided a blue slip for Miller. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved two 9th Circuit nominations along party lines even after neither of the home-state senators from California — White House contender Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisBiden tops Trump by 9 points in Fox News poll Biden could be picking the next president: VP choice more important than ever With VP pick, Biden can't play small ball in a long ball world MORE and Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinDOJ probing stock transactions made by lawmakers ahead of coronavirus crisis: report Lobbying frenzy connected to stimulus sparks backlash House bill would ban stock trading by members of Congress MORE, the top Democrat on the panel — returned a blue slip. 

Sen. Mazie HironoMazie Keiko HironoDemocratic senators ask IRS to extend tax filing deadline amid coronavirus outbreak Democratic senators ask prison operators for answers on coronavirus plans Overnight Energy: EPA revamps 'secret science' rule | Scientists warn rule still limits research | Trump calls for full funding for conservation program | 19 states sue over border wall funding MORE (D-Hawaii), another member of the panel, said the GOP’s decision to go nuclear is part of a McConnell plan to “get as many Trump judges with their really conservative right wing views onto the bench," but hedged when asked about not returning a blue slip on district nominees. 

“I’d like to see judges who we can’t tell if they’re Republicans or Democrats and we obviously need good judges, and if he actually nominates judges who can be that way then I would want them to get on the court,” she said. 

Democrats warn there’s no guarantee that if they instituted an across-the-board ban on returning blue slips for district judges that Republicans wouldn’t nix honoring the precedent even on the lower-court picks, mirroring their actions on circuit court judges. 

“Blue slips are a tradition, they’re not a rule, so if we stop returning blue slips there’s no guarantee the nominees won’t move forward,” Durbin said. 

Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntHillicon Valley: Apple rolls out coronavirus screening app, website | Pompeo urged to crack down on coronavirus misinformation from China | Senators push FTC on price gouging | Instacart workers threaten strike Lawmakers already planning more coronavirus stimulus after T package Senate Democrats vow to keep pushing for more funds for mail-in voting MORE (R-Mo.), a member of Republican leadership who co-sponsored the rules change resolution, said he was “very comfortable” about the GOP decision to use the “nuclear option” to cut down on the amount of debate time for district judges and most executive nominees.

“You know if they don’t want to get district judges in their districts I guess they have that option,” he said of calls for Democrats to stop returning blue slips for the nominations. 

Graham went a step further, hinting that if Democratic senators stopped returning blue slips in an effort to keep Trump from filling the seats, he could change his mind on letting home-state senators essentially have a veto on who gets appointed to be a district judge from their state. 

“I’ve helped the institution a lot. If it were up to me we would still have 60 votes,” Graham said. “But … if they want to abuse the blue slip process the blue slip process could go away.”