Dems face pressure from left to step up court fight on 'blue slips'   

Democrats are brushing off calls from the left to play hardball after Republicans invoked the “nuclear option” to speed up most of President TrumpDonald John TrumpForget the spin: Five unrefuted Mueller Report revelations Lara Trump: Merkel admitting migrants 'one of the worst things that ever happened to Germany' Financial satisfaction hits record high: survey MORE’s nominees. 

The move to reduce how long it takes to confirm hundreds of picks sparked a flurry of angry speeches from Democrats who characterized the move as a “sad day” for the Senate. 

The changes marked the second and third time Republicans have gone nuclear since Trump’s election, leaving progressive groups fuming over Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellElection agency limps into 2020 cycle The Hill's Morning Report - Will Joe Biden's unifying strategy work? Dems charge ahead on immigration MORE’s (R-Ky.) tactics and annoyed at what they see as a lack of a response from Democrats.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s really frustrating to watch Democrats sort of acknowledge that this is a Republican power grab, which of course it is, and then not commit to doing anything,” said Chris Kang, the chief counsel for Demand Justice. 

Outside groups have pressured Democrats to do more to make life difficult for Senate Republicans in response to the rule changes. 

In one sign of potential behind-the-scenes pushback, Republicans are delaying the first vote of the week until Tuesday even though McConnell teed up six nominations on Thursday. Republicans normally have a Monday evening vote, but that would require sign off from Democrats to speed up the first nomination.

But Democrats also reached a deal with Republicans to hold a final vote on a district judge nominee on Thursday morning, who was ultimately supported by more than a dozen Democratic senators. If Democrats had wanted to, they could have forced Republicans to stay later on Wednesday night to do the vote.

The relatively smooth proceedings didn’t go unnoticed by Republicans. An aide for McConnell asked reporters to “thank the Democrats on your way out tonight for not forcing a bunch of votes.” 

Democratic senators also are balking over calls to block the confirmation of district court judges from their own states by refusing to return “blue slips,” a sheet of paper that indicates if they support a nomination.

Republicans have confirmed judges to more powerful circuit courts without getting a blue slip from either home-state senator, a first for the Senate that has angered Democrats. 

But Democrats aren't willing to block district court nominees since blue slips are being honored in that process, giving them input on who the White House nominates. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamBarr to testify before Senate panel next week on Mueller report Kushner saying immigration plan will be 'neutral' on legal admissions: report Africa's women can change a continent: Will Ivanka give them her full support? MORE (R-S.C.) says he will honor the blue slip for lower-level district judges, whose jurisdiction is contained wholly within one state and whose rulings can be overruled at the appeals level. 

Kang argued that by refusing to return blue slips on district court judges, Democrats could try to force Republicans back to the negotiating table on how the Senate handles circuit court nominations. At a minimum, they could keep additional Trump nominees from getting confirmed. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It could actually force the Trump administration to change its behavior or not fill these vacancies,” Kang said. “If Democrats withheld their blue slips for these 70 district court vacancies and refused to let Trump fill them, Republicans would have to come back to the table with some response.” 

But Sen. Christopher CoonsChristopher (Chris) Andrew CoonsMenendez, Rubio lead Senate effort to regulate Venezuelan sanctions Dem report questions State Dept. decision to revoke award to Trump critic Booker takes early lead in 2020 endorsements MORE (D-Del.), a member of the Judiciary Committee, said such a proposal would be self-defeating.

“So hypothetically their great proposal is that we will hold vacant district court judgeships in our state?” he asked. “How does this make any sense?” 

Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinDurbin calls Mueller report findings on Trump team 'troubling' Congress opens door to fraught immigration talks McConnell: 'Past time' for immigration-border security deal MORE (D-Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, warned the tactic “makes no sense” if Democrats would be blocking judges they would otherwise support. 

Sen. Tim KaineTimothy (Tim) Michael KaineOnly four Dem senators have endorsed 2020 candidates Democratic proposals to overhaul health care: A 2020 primer Dems ask Justice Dept to release findings of Acosta-Epstein investigation MORE (D-Va.) held up his hands when asked about the suggestion. 

Sen. Sheldon WhitehouseSheldon WhitehouseHillicon Valley: Washington preps for Mueller report | Barr to hold Thursday presser | Lawmakers dive into AI ethics | FCC chair moves to block China Mobile | Dem bill targets 'digital divide' | Microsoft denies request for facial recognition tech Dems introduce bill to tackle 'digital divide' Senators press drug industry 'middlemen' over high prices MORE (D-R.I.), who like Durbin is a member of the Judiciary Committee, also criticized the strategy.

“If I approve of a judge and my blue slip has been honored and I feel I’ve had an adequate voice, we’ve got a good judge, I don’t see why we shouldn’t have them appointed,” he said. 

Republicans under Trump in February confirmed a circuit nominee for the first time without support from home state senators when they sent Eric Miller to the 9th Circuit. Neither Democratic senator from Washington provided a blue slip for Miller. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday approved two 9th Circuit nominations along party lines even after neither of the home-state senators from California — White House contender Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisThe symbol of 'Wakanda' and black political vision Seven big decisions facing Biden in 2020 primary Sanders dominates, Buttigieg surges in 2020 social media battle MORE and Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinBiden says he will run for president in 2020: 'We have to remember who we are' Seven big decisions facing Biden in 2020 primary Dems reject Barr's offer to view Mueller report with fewer redactions MORE, the top Democrat on the panel — returned a blue slip. 

Sen. Mazie HironoMazie Keiko HironoHillicon Valley: Washington preps for Mueller report | Barr to hold Thursday presser | Lawmakers dive into AI ethics | FCC chair moves to block China Mobile | Dem bill targets 'digital divide' | Microsoft denies request for facial recognition tech Dems introduce bill to tackle 'digital divide' Overnight Energy: Collins receives more donations from Texas oil, gas industry than from Maine residents | Interior chief left meetings off schedule | Omar controversy jeopardizes Ocasio-Cortez trip to coal mine MORE (D-Hawaii), another member of the panel, said the GOP’s decision to go nuclear is part of a McConnell plan to “get as many Trump judges with their really conservative right wing views onto the bench," but hedged when asked about not returning a blue slip on district nominees. 

“I’d like to see judges who we can’t tell if they’re Republicans or Democrats and we obviously need good judges, and if he actually nominates judges who can be that way then I would want them to get on the court,” she said. 

Democrats warn there’s no guarantee that if they instituted an across-the-board ban on returning blue slips for district judges that Republicans wouldn’t nix honoring the precedent even on the lower-court picks, mirroring their actions on circuit court judges. 

“Blue slips are a tradition, they’re not a rule, so if we stop returning blue slips there’s no guarantee the nominees won’t move forward,” Durbin said. 

Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntGOP senator: 'No problem' with Mueller testifying The Hill's Morning Report — Mueller aftermath: What will House Dems do now? Graham says he's 'not interested' in Mueller testifying MORE (R-Mo.), a member of Republican leadership who co-sponsored the rules change resolution, said he was “very comfortable” about the GOP decision to use the “nuclear option” to cut down on the amount of debate time for district judges and most executive nominees.

“You know if they don’t want to get district judges in their districts I guess they have that option,” he said of calls for Democrats to stop returning blue slips for the nominations. 

Graham went a step further, hinting that if Democratic senators stopped returning blue slips in an effort to keep Trump from filling the seats, he could change his mind on letting home-state senators essentially have a veto on who gets appointed to be a district judge from their state. 

“I’ve helped the institution a lot. If it were up to me we would still have 60 votes,” Graham said. “But … if they want to abuse the blue slip process the blue slip process could go away.”