Trump Jr. subpoena sparks internal GOP battle

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard BurrRichard Mauze BurrSeven-figure ad campaign urges GOP to support infrastructure bill Senate starts infrastructure debate amid 11th-hour drama The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - A huge win for Biden, centrist senators MORE’s surprise decision to subpoena Donald Trump Jr.Don TrumpDonald Trump Jr. joins Cameo Book claims Trump family members were 'inappropriately' close with Secret Service agents Trump Jr. shares edited video showing father knocking Biden down with golf ball MORE has set off an internal fight among Senate Republicans, some of whom are now pressing the North Carolina Republican to back off the request.

These Republicans argue that Trump Jr., the president’s eldest son, has spent enough time testifying before Congress and that the delivery of special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE’s report means it is time to end the investigations of the last presidential election.

“There’s no need for another subpoena for @DonaldJTrumpJr It’s time to move on & focus on issues Americans care about,” Sen. Ted CruzRafael (Ted) Edward CruzOvernight Defense: Senate panel votes to scrap Iraq war authorizations | Police officer fatally stabbed outside Pentagon ID'd | Biden admin approves first Taiwan arms sale Senate panel votes to repeal Iraq war authorizations America's pandemic of COVID hypocrisy MORE (R-Texas) tweeted Thursday.


He was one of several Republicans in the House and Senate who was critical of the decision to subpoena Trump Jr., which Burr made in consultation with his panel’s ranking member, Sen. Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerHillicon Valley: Senators highlight security threats from China during rare public hearing | Facebook suspends accounts of NYU researchers who've criticized platform Senators highlight national security threats from China during rare public hearing Overnight Defense: Police officer killed in violence outside Pentagon | Biden officials back repeal of Iraq War authorization | NSC pushed to oversee 'Havana Syndrome' response MORE (D-Va.).

President TrumpDonald TrumpMajority of Americans in new poll say it would be bad for the country if Trump ran in 2024 ,800 bottle of whiskey given to Pompeo by Japan is missing Liz Cheney says her father is 'deeply troubled' about the state of the Republican Party MORE said Thursday that he was “very surprised” by the subpoena, especially after Burr announced earlier that his panel had found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. 

“Frankly for my son, after being exonerated, to now get a subpoena to go again and speak again after close to 20 hours of telling everybody that would listen about a nothing meeting, yeah I’m surprised,” Trump told reporters at the White House. 

“I was very surprised. I saw Richard Burr saying there was no collusion two or three weeks ago,” Trump added. 

Because of Burr’s comments in February to CBS News saying the panel did not “have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,” Trump and his advisers were caught off guard by the Trump Jr. news.

White House acting chief of staff Mick MulvaneyMick MulvaneyHeadhunters having hard time finding jobs for former Trump officials: report Trump holdovers are denying Social Security benefits to the hardest working Americans Mulvaney calls Trump's comments on Capitol riot 'manifestly false' MORE told CBS News in an interview Wednesday that he thought it “bad form” that he did not get a heads-up before the subpoena was issued.  

It’s not clear if Trump Jr. will comply with the subpoena, though if he doesn’t it will just further add to the tensions in Washington.

Two congressional sources told Reuters Thursday that Trump Jr. is unlikely to comply with the subpoena and could cite his Fifth Amendment constitutional right against self-incrimination. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), a member of the Judiciary Committee and former U.S. attorney, argued that the president’s son could be jailed if he tries to invoke executive privilege to avoid testifying.

Some Republicans worry that Burr, who has said he will not run for another term in 2022, is giving Democrats more ammunition by calling Trump Jr. to testify a second time before the Intelligence Committee about Russia’s activities during the 2016 election.

Burr this week said he’s not pursuing a criminal investigation against Trump Jr. and defended his panel’s work during a Senate GOP lunch meeting on Thursday, explaining the repeated efforts his staff made to secure Trump Jr.’s testimony.

“I think he walked through more the series of how many efforts were made prior to this to get them to … set a time,” Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntMissouri Rep. Billy Long enters Senate GOP primary Graham's COVID-19 'breakthrough' case jolts Senate New spotlight on secretaries of state as electoral battlegrounds MORE (R-Mo.), a member of the Intelligence Committee, told reporters Thursday afternoon. 


Asked if members of the panel had received a heads-up about the subpoena, Blunt said the committee had previously decided to give Burr and Warner “extended subpoena authority and they used it.” 

Burr agreed to subpoena Trump Jr. as part of an agreement with Warner to bring back key witnesses who previously only testified to committee staff. 

Warner praised Burr for not rushing the investigation to an end in the wake of the Mueller report, despite pressure from other Republicans. 

“I’m very proud of the fact that we’re the only committee that’s kept bipartisan through this whole investigation. The chairman’s had pressure to shut this down for a long time, I’ve had pressure to reach a conclusion before we’re finished,” he said. 

Warner repeatedly declined to comment on the subpoena Thursday morning at a Christian Science Monitor breakfast but noted the panel has reserved the right to call back witnesses to answer additional questions or address “inconsistencies.”

“I’m not going to comment on specific witnesses,” he told reporters when asked if he was confident Trump Jr. had told the truth to the committee. “I will say that we have seen literally hundreds and hundreds of witnesses and the committee has been very clear with every one that we reserve the right to bring witnesses back if we have additional questions or there’s inconsistencies.”

Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioSenators highlight national security threats from China during rare public hearing Rubio presses DNI to investigate alleged unmasking of Tucker Carlson Senate holds sleepy Saturday session as negotiators finalize infrastructure deal MORE (R-Fla.), another member of the panel, said that colleagues had misinterpreted the committee’s work by assuming that Trump Jr. was being targeted over possible improper conduct. 

“I just think there’s a fundamental misunderstanding about what the committee is focused on,” Rubio said.

“If at any point in time anything came across our information gathering that potentially could be of a criminal justice nature, that was referred to the special prosecutor. We’re not prosecutors,” he said. “I think sometimes when people read this they think we’re the same thing as the special counsel. Our role is very different.”

Rubio said the committee is not looking to ensnare Trump Jr. but instead is focused on the broader policy question of investigating Russia’s efforts to influence the election and recommend safeguards. 

“We’re conducting oversight over the performance of the intelligence community in 2016, the nature of what Russia did and continues to do, what the threat is moving forward and what changes we need to make in our policies and laws to address that,” he said. 

Burr told The Hill Wednesday, before news of the subpoena emerged, that he’s not trying to duplicate special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.

“I’ve got reports to do, they don’t have anything to do with the Mueller report,” he said, explaining that Congress doesn’t have responsibility over criminal matters, which should be referred to the Justice Department.

Sen. John CornynJohn CornynWhite House trying to beat back bipartisan Cornyn infrastructure amendment Senate GOP shifts focus to fight over Biden's .5 trillion budget McConnell warns Schumer cutting off debate quickly could stall infrastructure deal MORE (R-Texas), another Intelligence Committee member and a member of the Senate GOP leadership team, warned that bringing Trump Jr. before the committee could inject politics into what has been so far a bipartisan investigation.

“At some point this is not about finding facts. This smacks of politics, and I think we have an important job to do to try to keep the Intelligence Committee out of politics and just keep ourselves focused on our mission, which is oversight of the intelligence community,” he said. 

But other members of the panel said it made sense to bring Trump Jr. in to bring closure to an investigation that has spanned almost two years. 

“I think they just wanted to get some questions straightened out, some answers straightened out based on people who came later,” Blunt said, referring to witnesses who testified after Trump Jr. 

Rubio said Burr doesn’t want to leave any questions left open before filing his report, which members of his panel expect to be finished by the end of August. 

“When you write a report, and you’ve gone this far and you’ve done this much work, there’s no point in not leaving nothing unchecked,” Rubio said.

Morgan Chalfant contributed.