GOP lawmakers want Mulvaney sidelined in budget talks

Senate Republicans, eager to avert a government shutdown or automatic spending cuts, want acting White House chief of staff Mick MulvaneyMick MulvaneyHeadhunters having hard time finding jobs for former Trump officials: report Trump holdovers are denying Social Security benefits to the hardest working Americans Mulvaney calls Trump's comments on Capitol riot 'manifestly false' MORE pushed to the sidelines in budget negotiations with Democrats.

GOP lawmakers would prefer Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven MnuchinThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Goldman Sachs - Biden rallies Senate Dems behind mammoth spending plan Mnuchin dodges CNBC questions on whether Trump lying over election Democrats justified in filibustering GOP, says Schumer MORE take the lead in representing the White House, as they see him being more amenable to a two-year spending deal that would also raise the debt limit.


Mulvaney, on the other hand, is viewed as resistant to striking a two-year deal, which would take the prospect of another government shutdown off the table until after the 2020 election.

And Republicans point to Mulvaney’s time in the House as the reason for their concern.

As a founding member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, Mulvaney was an outspoken critic of big budget deals that swell the federal deficit. That’s also one of the main reasons President TrumpDonald TrumpCuban embassy in Paris attacked by gasoline bombs Trump Jr. inches past DeSantis as most popular GOP figure in new poll: Axios Trump endorses Ken Paxton over George P. Bush in Texas attorney general race MORE appointed him to serve as White House budget director before he transitioned last year to serve as acting chief of staff.

GOP lawmakers say they were pleased that Mnuchin took the lead in a recent meeting Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiHouse rejects GOP effort to seat McCarthy's picks for Jan. 6 panel GOP brawls over Trump on eve of first Jan. 6 hearing Five things to watch as Jan. 6 panel begins its work MORE (D-Calif.) hosted in her office with Congress’s other top leaders.

“He’s been very helpful. My experience with Secretary Mnuchin has been very positive, and I think it’s a job he’d be good at,” Sen. John CornynJohn CornynDACA court ruling puts weight of immigration reform on Democrats Schumer feels pressure from all sides on spending strategy Data reveal big opportunity to finish the vaccine job MORE (R-Texas), an adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTrump Jr. inches past DeSantis as most popular GOP figure in new poll: Axios House rejects GOP effort to seat McCarthy's picks for Jan. 6 panel Senators scramble to save infrastructure deal MORE (R-Ky.), said of Mnuchin taking the lead for the White House in budget talks.

Cornyn said he understood from speaking to Sen. Patrick LeahyPatrick Joseph LeahySenate Democrats press administration on human rights abuses in Philippines Biden celebrates anniversary of Americans with Disabilities Act National Guard cancels trainings after Congress fails to reimburse for Capitol riot deployment MORE (Vt.), the ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee who is involved in the talks, that Mnuchin will be taking a more central role and praised it as a positive development.


Another Republican lawmaker close to the talks said Mnuchin is “now playing the lead role” and expressed satisfaction with that development.

“He brings the stature of the Cabinet,” the GOP senator said.

Republicans think Mnuchin will be more amenable to striking a deal with Democrats because he is eager to raise the debt limit in a timely and orderly way. A budget agreement would be a convenient vehicle to raise the debt limit, as it would likely pass both the Senate and House by wide margins.

Reaching a spending deal soon would also send a reassuring signal to financial markets.

“He’s been in the private sector. He understands it’s important to talk about the debt limit because he understands sending a message to bond markets around the world,” the GOP senator added.

Democrats publicly, and Republicans privately, have identified Mulvaney as an obstacle to getting a deal.

Mulvaney and Mnuchin have been on the same page in meetings with congressional leaders, but lawmakers suspect Mulvaney is more of an obstacle than Mnuchin, largely because of his past affiliation with the House Freedom Caucus.

“I think Mulvaney does not want a deal, and I think that’s the biggest problem. Mr. Mulvaney believes his negotiating authority or positioning will be better if there’s no deal,” said House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerMcCarthy mocks Cheney and Kinzinger as 'Pelosi Republicans' Biden celebrates anniversary of Americans with Disabilities Act Democrats brace for slog on Biden's spending plan MORE (D-Md.), who said he’s been briefed by Pelosi on the negotiations.

“One of the problems, of course, is the Republicans can’t get agreement among themselves, between the Republican senators and the White House, and that’s unfortunate,” added Hoyer.

Senate Republicans fear they will lose leverage the longer the talks remain stalled.

“At some point, somebody has to put the hammer down on Mulvaney. You’re not going to get anything you want unless Nancy gets everything she wants on the domestic side, moneywise, at least. I don’t know why they can’t figure that out,” a GOP lawmaker said of the difficulty the White House has had dealing with Pelosi.

“They think the president’s hand gets stronger over time. Most of us think it gets weaker over time,” the Republican lawmaker said, warning that letting the impasse drag out later in the year risks the chance of a government shutdown in December.

“Why would the president want to start the election year like that?” the senator asked, predicting that Republicans would get most of the blame for another government shutdown.

A senior administration official said, “It does no good for Republicans to negotiate with ourselves.”

The senior administration official said Democrats are to blame for the lack of progress and downplayed the likelihood of another shutdown or the scarier prospect of the federal government not being able to pay its obligations by failing to raise the debt ceiling.

“Democrats ended negotiations this week because they continue to push their dead-on-arrival $2 trillion increase with unserious policy riders, while the administration has made serious compromise offers,” the official said. “A shutdown or debt default is not going to happen.”

McConnell hosted a meeting with Mulvaney, Mnuchin and senior members of the Senate Appropriations Committee last week in an effort to convince the White House that a two-year spending deal is the best option.

Mulvaney has frustrated GOP and Democratic lawmakers alike by pushing for a one-year deal instead of the two-year deal that McConnell and most Senate Republicans favor.

“I think Mulvaney wants a one-year deal,” Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyNational Guard cancels trainings after Congress fails to reimburse for Capitol riot deployment This week: Senate faces infrastructure squeeze GOP seeks to make Biden synonymous with inflation MORE (R-Ala.) said before the meeting.

Sen. Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderAuthorities link ex-Tennessee governor to killing of Jimmy Hoffa associate The Republicans' deep dive into nativism Senate GOP faces retirement brain drain MORE (R-Tenn.) said the talks have dragged on for long enough.

“I just think it’s time for the president and the Republican leaders to sit down and work this out. We need to get on with it,” he said.

Republicans were frustrated this week when Mnuchin and Mulvaney proposed a fallback option of passing a one-year continuing resolution (CR) that would essentially freeze spending at fiscal 2019 levels.

“I hate that idea,” said Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamGOP sees debt ceiling as its leverage against Biden DACA court ruling puts weight of immigration reform on Democrats Senate braces for a nasty debt ceiling fight MORE (R-S.C.), who has otherwise defended Mulvaney as doing a good job, when asked about the idea of a yearlong CR.

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsSchumer urges GOP to ignore Trump: He's 'rooting for failure' Trump pressures McConnell, GOP to ditch bipartisan talks until they have majority Transit funding, broadband holding up infrastructure deal MORE (R-Maine) said, “A one-year CR is a very bad idea.”

“CRs lock in spending from the previous year and do not take into account priorities or changed circumstances,” she said.

Sen. Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiWhy Biden's Interior Department isn't shutting down oil and gas Biden signs bill to bolster crime victims fund Bipartisan group says it's still on track after setback on Senate floor MORE (R-Alaska) said, “You know how I feel about CRs. I’m not a fan.”

Another Republican member of the Senate Appropriations Committee called a one-year stopgap “a terrible idea.”

While Mnuchin was the one who proposed a one-year stopgap measure as a plan B, lawmakers saw Mulvaney, who still serves as the White House budget director in addition to his role as acting chief of staff, as the main impetus behind it.

Russell Vought, Mulvaney’s former deputy who now serves as acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, suggested in late April during a meeting with senior congressional staff that Congress should consider a long-term CR if it couldn’t reach a deal on raising the spending caps.