Democrats warm to idea of studying reparations

Democrats warm to idea of studying reparations
© Greg Nash

Senate Democrats are warming to the idea of studying reparations for African Americans whose ancestors suffered economically as a result of slavery and decades of repressive Jim Crow-era laws.

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerTrump defends 'crime buster' Giuliani amid reported probe Louisiana voters head to the polls in governor's race as Trump urges GOP support Trump urges Louisiana voters to back GOP in governor's race then 'enjoy the game' MORE (D-N.Y.) on Tuesday told a small group of reporters that he supports legislation sponsored by Sen. Cory BookerCory Anthony BookerHillicon Valley: Warren takes on Facebook over political ads | Zuckerberg defends meetings with conservatives | Civil liberties groups sound alarm over online extremism bill O'Rourke hits back at Buttigieg over criticism of his gun buyback proposal Progressives fume at Buttigieg, warn him not to attack Warren at debate MORE (D-N.J.) and Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson LeeConsequential GOP class of 1994 all but disappears Video of Greta Thunberg crossing paths with Trump at UN goes viral Lewandowski: House testimony shows I'd be 'a fighter' in the Senate MORE (D-Texas) that would set up a commission to explore reparations, signaling changing attitudes among Democrats on the charged issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

Booker said he “absolutely” thinks he’s getting traction as more Democrats come around to supporting an examination of the issue.

“I’m excited that people can really focus past the bluster of people who want to demonize the idea that we should study a way to address specific past economic harms and try to create more economic equality,” Booker, who is running for president, told The Hill.

“When people actually can focus in on what the actual bill says, it’s something that is frankly not objectionable,” he added. “I think there’s an openness to having this urgently needed conversation, especially as we deal with the continuing legacy of past specific economic harms that have helped to bake in structural inequality in our country.”

Booker’s bill has 15 co-sponsors in the Senate, and he says he is actively seeking to expand the list.

Sens. Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisO'Rourke hits back at Buttigieg over criticism of his gun buyback proposal Warren leads Democratic field by 3 points in new national poll Analysis: Warren and Booker most cyber-aware 2020 candidates MORE (D-Calif.), Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenSupport drops for Medicare for All but increases for public option Hillicon Valley: Warren takes on Facebook over political ads | Zuckerberg defends meetings with conservatives | Civil liberties groups sound alarm over online extremism bill Feehery: Trump may be down, but he's not out yet MORE (D-Mass.), Bernie SandersBernie SandersSupport drops for Medicare for All but increases for public option Hillicon Valley: Warren takes on Facebook over political ads | Zuckerberg defends meetings with conservatives | Civil liberties groups sound alarm over online extremism bill On The Money: Trump touts China trade deal | Wall Street, Washington see signs for caution | Trump threatens sanctions on Turkey | Sanders proposes sharp hike to corporate taxes MORE (I-Vt.), Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharHillicon Valley: Warren takes on Facebook over political ads | Zuckerberg defends meetings with conservatives | Civil liberties groups sound alarm over online extremism bill Analysis: Warren and Booker most cyber-aware 2020 candidates Poll: Democratic support for Warren climbs to record high MORE (D-Minn.) and Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Gillibrand2020 Presidential Candidates Krystal Ball: Yang campaign a 'triumph of substance over the theatre' Three 2020 candidates have missed about half of Senate votes MORE (D-N.Y.), who are all running for the Democratic presidential nomination, have co-sponsored Booker’s bill.

Race relations and economic inequality have become central topics of debate ahead of the 2020 election.

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBusiness school deans call for lifting country-specific visa caps Bolton told ex-Trump aide to call White House lawyers about Ukraine pressure campaign: report Federal prosecutors in New York examining Giuliani business dealings with Ukraine: report MORE sparked a heated debate this week over what constitutes racist language when he tweeted on Sunday that four Democratic congresswomen of color should “go back” to the “crime-infested places from which they came,” even though all of them are American citizens and three were born in the United States.

Schumer, who on Monday excoriated Trump over his comments, told reporters the following day that racism is “the poison of America.” He then pledged to support establishing a commission to study reparations for slavery and discriminatory laws.

“The disparities in race affect everything, not just the obvious things,” Schumer said. “The legacy of slavery and Jim Crow are still with us.”

But while there is growing support among Democrats on Capitol Hill for studying reparations, lawmakers warn it’s a tricky issue.

A nationwide poll conducted in July 2018 by Data for Progress, a left-leaning think tank, found that 26 percent of respondents supported reparations, compared with 47 percent who were opposed to the idea.

That level of support was unchanged from a Marist poll two years earlier that found 26 percent supported reparations, while 68 percent said the federal government should not compensate the descendants of slaves.

Sen. Dick DurbinRichard (Dick) Joseph DurbinSenators take fundraising efforts to Nats playoff games Overnight Health Care: Watchdog finds DEA allowed more opioids even as overdose deaths rose | Judge temporarily blocks Georgia abortion law | Three states report more vaping deaths | Dem proposes new fix for surprise medical bills During impeachment storm, senators cross aisle to lessen mass incarceration MORE (D-Ill.), a co-sponsor of Booker’s bill, said “looking at alternatives is reasonable,” and that he would like to hear the suggestions of a special commission on reparations.

As an alumnus of Georgetown University, Durbin noted that students at his alma mater voted earlier this year to pay reparations to the descendants of slaves whose forced labor benefited the school.

“That was the right thing to do,” he said about the vote.

But Durbin said the question of how and whether to pay reparations to tens of millions of African Americans is tough to answer.

“It is impossible to argue against the notion that a grave injustice took place, but we are far removed — generations removed — from those who were directly impacted,” he said. “That’s why I want to hear suggestions about some other approach, or some approach that is fair and acceptable.”

“I voted for the reparations for those who were interned in the Japanese American internment camps, but these were specific people who were wronged, and they and their families benefited from our decision. This is a bigger challenge,” he added.

The legislation sponsored by Booker and Jackson Lee would establish a 13-member commission to examine the role of the federal and state governments in supporting the institution of slavery and recommend “appropriate remedies.”

The president would appoint three members, the Speaker of the House would appoint three members, and the president pro tempore of the Senate would appoint one member.

The other six members would be selected from “the major civil society and reparations organizations that have historically championed the cause of reparatory justice,” which would likely tilt the commission strongly in favor of substantial monetary reparations.

Yahoo Finance in June estimated the legislation, if enacted, could cost as much as $17.1 trillion.

William Darity Jr., an economist at Duke University and expert on reparations, told The New York Times in May that about 30 million Americans could be eligible for compensation.

The issue has become more prominent in Washington since even a few months ago, when Booker introduced his legislation in early April.

As recently as late June, Democratic lawmakers such as Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne Emiel FeinsteinSchiff should consider using RICO framework to organize impeachment We need answers to questions mainstream media won't ask about Democrats The Hill's Morning Report - Trump grapples with Syria fallout MORE (Calif.) suggested the thorny issue was “better left alone” or refused to comment about it altogether.

But Schumer’s statement this week in support of studying reparations sent a clear message to the Senate Democratic Conference that the issue cannot be avoided.

Sen. Jack ReedJohn (Jack) Francis ReedFury over Trump Syria decision grows Democrats warn Trump's Turkey sanctions don't go far enough Democrats urge Rick Perry not to roll back lightbulb efficiency rules MORE (D-R.I.), who declined to comment a few weeks ago on the proposal to study reparations, said Wednesday that reparations are “something we should consider” and that he would take a look at legislation to study them.

Sen. Jeff MerkleyJeffrey (Jeff) Alan MerkleyDemocrats urge Rick Perry not to roll back lightbulb efficiency rules Democratic senator on Trump's 'treason' comments about whistleblower: 'I worry about threats on his or her life' Overnight Energy: Lawmakers show irritation over withheld Interior documents | Republican offers bipartisan carbon tax bill | Scientists booted from EPA panel form new group MORE (D-Ore.) joined as a co-sponsor to the bill Tuesday.

“I’m supportive of study. I think there’s a lot of complex questions that I think the commission might be able to shed a little light on, so I think it makes sense to hold a conversation,” he said.

But Merkley added that the issue “doesn’t come up very often” in his home state of Oregon, where only 2 percent of the population is African American.

Harris told NPR in March that many African Americans suffer from “untreated and undiagnosed trauma” that can be traced back to slavery and discrimination and argued “you need to put resources and direct resources — extra resources — into those communities that have experienced that trauma.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Her position reflects the evolution of the Democratic Party in recent years.

When Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaObama praises marathon runners Eliud Kipchoge and Brigid Kosgei for 'remarkable examples of humanity's ability' Each of us has a role in preventing veteran suicide Why calls for impeachment have become commonplace MORE, the nation’s first black president, ran for the Oval Office in 2008, he came out against monetary reparations.

He voiced concern in a candidate questionnaire submitted to the NAACP that “reparations would be an excuse for some to say ‘we’ve paid our debt’ and to avoid the much harder work of enforcing our anti-discrimination laws in employment and housing; the much harder work of making sure that our schools are not separate and unequal; the much harder work of providing job training programs and rehabilitating young men coming out of prison every year.”

Eleven years later, Democratic senators are saying it’s a topic that deserves serious legislative  attention.

Sen. Ed MarkeyEdward (Ed) John MarkeyDemocrats urge Rick Perry not to roll back lightbulb efficiency rules Ocasio-Cortez taps supporters for donations as former primary opponent pitches for Kennedy Rep. Joe Kennedy has history on his side in Senate bid MORE (D-Mass.), a bill co-sponsor, said the matter is “something that we absolutely have to put on the agenda” so that Congress “can understand the whole history of the issue.”