SPONSORED:

Senate GOP in bind on impeachment

Senate Republicans, with 22 seats up for reelection and their majority up for grabs in 2020, are in a bind over how to defend President TrumpDonald John TrumpFederal watchdog accuses VOA parent company of wrongdoing under Trump appointee Lawsuit alleges 200K Georgia voters were wrongly purged from registration list Ivanka Trump gives deposition in lawsuit alleging misuse of inauguration funds MORE from the House impeachment push.

They realize their political fortunes and policy goals are tied to the president, but they also know their best shot at keeping control of the Senate hinges on senators preserving their independent brands.

ADVERTISEMENT

That means they have to be careful in defending conduct they see as improper; several Senate Republicans say it would be wrong to hold up military aid to Ukraine to gain political leverage, the issue at the heart of the impeachment inquiry.

Senate Republicans on Tuesday took a decidedly cautious approach as a White House witness offered new testimony in the House critical of Trump.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHillicon Valley: GOP chairman says defense bill leaves out Section 230 repeal | Senate panel advances FCC nominee | Krebs says threats to election officials 'undermining democracy' On The Money: Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms | Pelosi, Schumer endorse 8 billion plan as basis for stimulus talks | Poll: Most Americans support raising taxes on those making at least 0K Nearly one-third of US adults expect to lose employment income: Census Bureau MORE (R-Ky.) claimed victory in Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOn The Money: Funding bill hits snag as shutdown deadline looms | Pelosi, Schumer endorse 8 billion plan as basis for stimulus talks | Poll: Most Americans support raising taxes on those making at least 0K Battle heats up for House Foreign Affairs gavel Nearly one-third of US adults expect to lose employment income: Census Bureau MORE’s (D-Calif.) decision to hold a House vote Thursday on impeachment procedures but stopped short of outlining his next moves.

“Obviously they’ve responded to the pressure that we put on them to try to handle this in a more transparent way that meets basic standards of due process that every American would be entitled to,” he said.

“We’ll have to take a look at what the House produces later today and see if it passes the smell test of providing the kind of due process protections that the president and his team are certainly entitled to, just like President Nixon was and President Clinton was,” he said.

Trump and Republican leaders in the House have telegraphed a new strategy intended to move away from attacks against Democrats on process, and toward a more robust defense of the president on the merits of impeachment.

“I’d rather go into the details of the case rather than the process,” Trump said Monday before a trip to Chicago.

“Process is wonderful,” he added. “But I think you ought to look at the case.”

But McConnell, a master of procedural fights, didn’t endorse the shift in his comments.

Instead, he noted that the resolution he and 49 other Republican senators sponsored condemning the House impeachment process “didn’t deal with the merits” of the charges against Trump.

And McConnell seemed reluctant to give up the strategy of attacking Democrats on procedural grounds.

Several factors help explain McConnell’s approach, while illustrating the tight spot he is navigating.

The GOP conference he leads is divided over the substance of the charges against Trump.

Three Senate Republicans, Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsMark Kelly sworn in to Senate seat Biden brushes off criticism of budget nominee Scammers step up efforts to target older Americans during pandemic MORE (Maine), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiMcConnell in tough position as House eyes earmark return Pressure builds for coronavirus relief with no clear path to deal Bipartisan, bicameral group unveils 8 billion coronavirus proposal MORE (Alaska) and Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyMark Kelly sworn in to Senate seat Bipartisan, bicameral group unveils 8 billion coronavirus proposal The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Mastercard - GOP angst in Georgia; confirmation fight looms MORE (Utah), did not support the resolution condemning the House inquiry.

ADVERTISEMENT

A senior Republican senator predicted last week the resolution would never get a vote on the Senate floor because it would put vulnerable incumbents and GOP senators who have expressed concerns over Trump’s conduct in a tough position.

McConnell on Tuesday said, “We haven’t made a decision on that yet.”

Polls of independent voters are finding more support for impeachment, a trend undoubtedly troubling to McConnell — who is focused on ensuring the GOP keeps its majority next year.

A Reuters-Ipsos poll last week found support for impeaching Trump surging among independents to 45 percent, with just 32 percent opposing it. A survey from Quinnipiac University Poll last week showed a 16-point swing in favor of the House impeachment investigation among self-described independents.

Republican senators are also uncomfortable defending Trump on the underlying charge, that Trump held up military aid to Ukraine to pressure its leaders to investigate former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenLawsuit alleges 200K Georgia voters were wrongly purged from registration list GOP lawmaker blasts incoming freshman over allegations of presidential voter fraud Haaland has competition to be first Native American to lead Interior  MORE.

The attacks by Trump allies on key House witnesses who have impressive résumés and no obvious signs of partisan affiliation make GOP senators uncomfortable.

McConnell on Tuesday said he did not want to question the patriotism of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who testified before the House on Tuesday about Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and other witnesses.

“I’m not going to question the patriotism of any of the people who are coming forward,” he told reporters.

Vindman testified that he thought Trump’s pressure on Zelensky was improper and worried about the implications for U.S. support for Ukraine.

Finally, if the House does go forward with impeachment, the Senate will be the jury. Several GOP senators have indicated they see their role in the process as serious, and as a result do not want to go too far with their public statements.

Senate Republicans largely took a step back from the impeachment debate Tuesday. A GOP senator who attended the weekly lunch meeting said impeachment did not take up much discussion time.

Senate Republican Policy Committee Chairman Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Mastercard - Barr splits with Trump on election; pardon controversy Lobbying world Top GOP senator warns government funding deal unlikely this week MORE (Mo.), who hosted the lunch, said “on impeachment, it’s just totally up to the House.”

“We’ll deal with it if the House sends it over, and we’ll see what the calendar in front of us looks like, and whether holidays or the Democratic caucuses or anything else has any impact on how the Senate wants to deal with it timewise,” he said. “Otherwise we’ll deal with it exactly as the Senate rules require.”

McConnell on Tuesday largely dodged a question about whether he considers the House impeachment process as “illegitimate.”

“Look, impeachment as a practical matter is whatever a majority of the House decides it is at any given moment,” he said.

“It appears that the Democrats, emboldened by the new majority they’ve had this year, have been on this path for three years,” he added, sticking to his general defense of Trump by arguing the Democrats are driven primarily by politics and a desire to overturn the results of the 2016 election.

Jordain Carney contributed.