SPONSORED:

Both sides have reason to want speedy Trump impeachment trial

Senators in both parties say there is incentive across the political spectrum to keep President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden to nominate Linda Thomas-Greenfield for UN ambassador: reports Scranton dedicates 'Joe Biden Way' to honor president-elect Kasich: Republicans 'either in complete lockstep' or 'afraid' of Trump MORE’s expected impeachment trial as short as possible, especially since his acquittal appears to be a foregone conclusion.

GOP senators say they want to give Trump ample time to present his defense and call witnesses, if necessary, but they would prefer to avoid burning up too much floor time and risking the awkward possibility of an impeachment trial overlapping with next year’s State of the Union address.

Some Senate Democrats worry about voters suffering from impeachment fatigue and the trial butting up against the Iowa caucuses. Senators are expected to attend the trial, and that would keep the chamber’s presidential candidates off the campaign trail.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time, senators on both sides of the aisle recognize that an impeachment trial is one of the Senate’s most solemn duties and they need to show they are taking articles of impeachment seriously. But that doesn’t necessarily mean they want weeks to become months. 

“There may be a sense among Democrats as well as Republicans that it shouldn’t be extended,” said one Republican senator who requested anonymity to comment on the motivations of colleagues ahead of the trial. 

A Democratic senator warned that a lengthy impeachment trial effectively “freezes” the Democratic presidential primary by putting pressure on Sens. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenDemocrats brush off calls for Biden to play hardball on Cabinet picks What's behind the divisions over Biden's secretary of Labor? Alito to far-right litigants: The buffet is open MORE (D-Mass.), Bernie SandersBernie SandersDemocrats brush off calls for Biden to play hardball on Cabinet picks What's behind the divisions over Biden's secretary of Labor? Young voters set turnout record, aiding Biden win MORE (I-Vt.), Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharFormer Minnesota Democratic leader quits party Top cybersecurity official ousted by Trump Lawmakers question tech CEOs about content moderation in first post-election hearing MORE (D-Minn.) and other candidates to miss valuable campaign time.

“I think that people in New Hampshire and Iowa would say, ‘You should be doing your job.’ That’s what I think they would say and it’s a problem. It freezes the race,” said the Democratic senator. “I think both parties have incentive to try to get this wrapped up.”

“If you’re Trump, you want it over as fast as you can because he can say, ‘Look, I was acquitted, there was nothing,’” the Democratic lawmaker added.

A second Democratic senator said the impeachment trial should be wrapped up before the Iowa caucuses, scheduled for Feb. 3, because it would make the impeachment process look even more politicized if it overlapped with the primary season.

Some Democrats are worried about impeachment fatigue setting in among voters, noting that polling from last month showed independents and voters in swing states souring on the prospect of removing Trump from office.

Sen. Joe ManchinJoseph (Joe) ManchinOVERNIGHT ENERGY: Barrasso to seek top spot on Energy and Natural Resources Committee | Forest Service finalizes rule weakening environmental review of its projects | Biden to enlist Agriculture, Transportation agencies in climate fight Barrasso to seek top spot on Energy and Natural Resources Committee The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the UAE Embassy in Washington, DC - Dems push McConnell on COVID-19 relief; Grassley contracts COVID-19 MORE (D-W.Va.), a prominent centrist, said voters are already tiring of the partisan process. 

“People are fatigued now. Anything else that we do that drags this out further than need be, it just wears on people. Enough’s enough,” he said. 

Republican senators say they don’t want to cut short the trial prematurely, but they’re also cringing at the possibility of it running up against the State of the Union address.

“I think it would be awkward to have the State of the Union in the midst of such a trial,” said Sen. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioDemocrats brush off calls for Biden to play hardball on Cabinet picks GOP senator congratulates Biden, says Trump should accept results GOP lawmaker patience runs thin with Trump tactics MORE (R-Fla.), who added that Trump’s address to Congress is likely to feel awkward anyway since the House is expected to impeach him later this month. 

Rubio said both sides could quickly reach agreement to hold a final up-or-down vote on impeachment, arguing that the underlying facts aren’t really in dispute.

“The president doesn’t deny, for example, talking to the president of Ukraine,” he said, noting the White House released a rough transcript of Trump’s July 25 conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the impeachment inquiry.

ADVERTISEMENT

A second Republican senator who requested anonymity to talk about how colleagues feel about an extended trial agreed that holding the State of the Union during impeachment would be “awkward” but said it’s too early to know how much floor time is needed to weigh the charges against Trump.

The State of the Union address is typically held in January or early February. Former President Clinton's 1999 impeachment trial stretched from early January to Feb. 12. 

A third Republican senator raised the prospect that Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiUS economy hurtles toward 'COVID cliff' with programs set to expire Democrats gear up for last oversight showdown with Trump Divided citizenry and government — a call to action for common ground MORE (D-Calif.) might not invite Trump to deliver the State of the Union to a joint session of Congress if the trial is still taking place. 

The GOP senator noted the constitutional requirement for the address is loosely termed, stating only that the president “shall from time to time give Congress information of the State of the Union” and that Trump could submit a written report instead of delivering a speech in person.

Some House Republicans in 1999 considered withholding an invitation for Clinton during his impeachment trial.

In the end, Clinton was allowed to deliver his remarks on Jan. 19, about a week into his Senate trial, which he used to focus on the strength of the economy, the $70 billion budget surplus and shoring up Social Security. He did not mention his impeachment.

Some GOP lawmakers, however, aren’t so sure Trump would be able to keep the same message discipline and worry he might be tempted to lash out against Democrats.

Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonLoeffler isolating after possible COVID-19 infection Rick Scott tests positive for coronavirus GOP Rep. Dan Newhouse tests positive for COVID-19 MORE (R-Wis.), one of Trump’s staunch allies, said “it’s pretty much up to the president and his legal team to determine how long they want this thing to run” but predicted senators will be ready to wrap up the trial quickly.

“At this point I think it’s pretty obvious, you could probably call the motion to call the vote very early in the process,” he said.

While Johnson wants to give Trump a full opportunity to defend himself, he doesn’t see much point in spending a lot of time on the trial when it’s clear Democrats will fall well-short of the 67 votes they need to convict the president on any charges.

“There’s a lot of work to be done. I want to get this over as quickly as possible,” Johnson said, predicting Democrats will not want the proceedings to extend beyond a couple of weeks.

“It may be pretty easy to get the 51 votes to move to a final vote,” he said.

White House counsel Pat Cipollone held a lunch meeting with Senate Republicans on Wednesday, but he didn’t give lawmakers any indication of whether the president’s defense team favors a short or long trial or which witnesses it plans to call.

Some Democrats outside of Congress have suggested Trump might use the spotlight of a Senate trial for his own political benefit. 

Democratic presidential candidate Andrew YangAndrew YangMedia and Hollywood should stop their marching-to-Georgia talk Andrew Yang: Democrats need to adopt message that government is 'working for them' Andrew Yang moving to Georgia to help Democrats in Senate runoffs MORE told former Obama strategist David AxelrodDavid AxelrodWhat a Biden administration should look like Obama book excerpt: 'Hard to deny my overconfidence' during early health care discussions CNN's Axelrod on Biden debate performance: 'If you're ahead and you get a draw, you win' MORE in an interview Thursday that “the biggest drawback of impeachment is that Donald Trump is a creature who thrives on attention, and impeachment is attention.”

“Even if it seems like it’s bad for him, he’s winning,” Yang added.

Publicly, Democratic senators say they will spend as much time as it takes to give House-passed articles of impeachment a thorough review. 

“I don’t care about timetables,” said Sen. Sherrod BrownSherrod Campbell BrownOn The Money: Democrats accuse Mnuchin of sabotaging economy in dispute with Fed | Trump administration proposal takes aim at bank pledges to avoid fossil fuel financing | JPMorgan: Economy will shrink in first quarter due to COVID-19 spike Democrats accuse Mnuchin of sabotaging economy in dispute with Fed McSally, staff asked to break up maskless photo op inside Capitol MORE (D-Ohio), who said the House impeachment managers and Trump’s defense team “need to do what they need to do.”

“Trump’s people say they want their day in court, they say [the evidence] is hearsay. Well, the House needs to start hearing from people that are accused of wrongdoing or those that observed things so I don’t think setting any deadline or timetable makes sense,” he said.

Asked about interfering with the Democratic presidential primary, Brown said, “I don’t care about that.”

Sen. Debbie StabenowDeborah (Debbie) Ann StabenowSenate Democrats reelect Schumer as leader by acclamation  Bottom line Peters fends off challenge in Michigan Senate race MORE (D-Mich.) said, “There’s no preconceived timeline.”

“It’s whatever it takes to be fair,” she said.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyDemocrats brush off calls for Biden to play hardball on Cabinet picks Biden decides on pick for secretary of State Overnight Defense: Formal negotiations inch forward on defense bill with Confederate base name language | Senators look to block B UAE arms sales | Trump administration imposes Iran sanctions over human rights abuses MORE (D-Conn.) added, “We have a constitutional duty, and the timing is what the timing is.”