SPONSORED:

Five fights awaiting Congress in 2020

Congress is set to return to a laundry list of divisive fights looming over its 2020 agenda when both chambers reconvene in the coming days.

Lawmakers will have to balance the Trump impeachment trial, which will suck up much of the oxygen in January, with several key legislative deadlines.

The balancing act will also take place amid the run-up to the 2020 election, with presidential politics increasingly seeping into congressional negotiations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Here are five fights to watch in 2020.


Impeachment

The months-long impeachment fight is shifting to the Senate, where the chamber left for the holiday recess without a deal on rules for the trial, including a start date and whether any witnesses will be called.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiMnuchin says he learned of Pelosi's letter to him about stimulus talks 'in the press' On The Money: Trump makes a late pitch on the economy | US economy records record GDP gains after historic COVID-19 drop | Pelosi eyes big COVID-19 deal in lame duck Pelosi challenger calls delay on COVID-19 relief bill the 'privilege of politics' MORE (D-Calif.) threw a curveball into the timeline by declining to say when she will send over the two articles of impeachment, though senators say they nonetheless expect the trial to commence in January.

Once impeachment is on the Senate floor, all other legislative business will likely be put on hold. Senators are expected to conduct trial proceedings six days a week, a schedule that promises to consume much if not all of January’s floor calendar.

With 67 votes needed to convict Trump, the outcome of the proceeding is all but guaranteed in the GOP-controlled chamber, where Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMnuchin says he learned of Pelosi's letter to him about stimulus talks 'in the press' On The Money: Trump makes a late pitch on the economy | US economy records record GDP gains after historic COVID-19 drop | Pelosi eyes big COVID-19 deal in lame duck Lawmakers say infrastructure efforts are falling victim to deepening partisan divide MORE (R-Ky.) has pledged to be in “total coordination” with the White House.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Democrats are hoping to win over a handful of Republicans on their request for Ukraine-related documents and witnesses at the trial. They would need four GOP senators to break ranks to successfully call a witness for trial testimony.

“So far, neither Sen. McConnell, nor any Republican senator, has articulated a single good reason why the trial shouldn’t have these witnesses or these documents,” Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerHouse Democrats introduce bill to invest 0 billion in STEM research and education Graham dismisses criticism from Fox Business's Lou Dobbs Lewandowski: Trump 'wants to see every Republican reelected regardless of ... if they break with the president' MORE (D-N.Y.) told reporters this week during a press conference.


USMCA

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden campaign slams Facebook after thousands of ads blocked by platform's pre-election blackout Mnuchin says he learned of Pelosi's letter to him about stimulus talks 'in the press' Harris to travel to Texas Friday after polls show tie between Trump, Biden MORE’s trade deal — the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) — passed the House in mid-December but is stuck in a holding pattern in the Senate until after the impeachment trial wraps up.

Ratification of the deal, meant to replace the Clinton-era North American Free Trade Agreement, would hand Trump an early election year win after months of closed-door negotiations with Pelosi initially made it unlikely the deal would move forward.

But Democrats were able to include tougher labor provisions that won over the support of unions and progressives, while also giving a major legislative win for vulnerable Democrats to tout back in their districts.

The Senate Finance Committee is scheduled to mark up the trade deal on Tuesday, and Senate GOP leaders expect they’ll ultimately be able to pass the USMCA early this year. The measure requires only a simple majority, instead of the 60 votes normally needed for advancing legislation.

Still, the deal unveiled in December initially prompted pushback from GOP senators who were largely cut out of the negotiations and worry the White House made too many concessions to House Democrats.

Sen. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyAppeals court rules NSA's bulk phone data collection illegal Dunford withdraws from consideration to chair coronavirus oversight panel GOP senators push for quick, partial reopening of economy MORE (R-Pa.) has emerged as one of the most vocal GOP critics. He pledged in a Wall Street Journal opinion last month to vote against the deal, calling it the “only trade pact ever meant to diminish trade.”


Surveillance reform

Lawmakers are eyeing changes to surveillance authorities and the warrant application process in 2020.

Congress faces a mid-March deadline on expiring surveillance authorities under the USA Freedom Act after lawmakers extended the programs in mid-December for 90 days to give themselves more time to work out a larger agreement.

ADVERTISEMENT

The sunset provisions include a controversial records program, known as Section 215, that gathers metadata on domestic text messages and phone calls. The Trump administration has urged Congress to reauthorize the program even though the National Security Agency shuttered it, with the White House arguing the authority should be retained in case it’s needed at a later date.

Two other provisions — one authorizing “roving” wiretaps, the other on lone wolf surveillance authority — are also set to expire.

In addition to the surveillance authorities, lawmakers are also homing in on reforms to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court and the warrant application process in the wake of a scathing report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz on applications to surveil Trump campaign aide Carter Page.

One idea that has bipartisan support would be to allow the Justice Department inspector general to investigate misconduct by attorneys within the department, which current law prohibits.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamThe Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Election night could be a bit messy The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - Trump, Biden blitz battleground states Late donor surges push election spending projections to new heights MORE (R-S.C.) has pledged that FISA reforms “will be a top priority for the Judiciary Committee in 2020.”


Drug pricing

ADVERTISEMENT

House Democrats are making a renewed effort to get legislation to lower drug prices across the finish line this year after legislative action ran into partisan roadblocks and lobbying from outside groups in 2019.

Pelosi wants drug pricing legislation to be included in a package of expiring health care programs that face a May 22 deadline, with the hope that House passage could put pressure on the Republican-controlled Senate. 

“When we return to Washington, our priority will be to continue a drumbeat across America to press the President and the GOP Senate to pass the Lower Drug Costs Now Act into law,” Pelosi wrote in a "Dear Colleague" letter that was sent to House Democrats this week.

The House passed Pelosi’s drug pricing bill last month but it ran into fierce criticism from Senate Republicans, including McConnell, who have declared the House bill dead on arrival and pledged that they will not take it up.

In the Senate, Finance Committee Chairman Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyBarrett confirmation stokes Democrats' fears over ObamaCare On The Money: Power players play chess match on COVID-19 aid | Pelosi bullish, Trump tempers optimism | Analysis: Nearly 1M have run out of jobless benefits Grassley: Voters should be skeptical of Biden's pledge to not raise middle class taxes MORE (R-Iowa) has negotiated a narrower bill with Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenOn The Money: Dow falls more than 900 points amid fears of new COVID-19 restrictions | Democrats press Trump Org. about president's Chinese bank account | Boeing plans thousands of additional job cuts Democrats press Trump Organization about president's Chinese bank account Plaintiff and defendant from Obergefell v. Hodges unite to oppose Barrett's confirmation MORE (D-Ore.), the Finance Committee's ranking member, but that too has garnered Republican pushback because of a provision that would limit Medicare drug price hikes to the rate of inflation.

Grassley has accused McConnell of urging Republicans not to support his bill, marking a rare high-profile clash between the Republican leader and a GOP committee chairman.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Leadership doesn’t want it to come up,” Grassley told reporters last month.


Government funding

Though Congress just passed a two-bill package that funds the government through Sept. 30, appropriators are already turning their attention to the fiscal 2021 funding process, which they expect to start within the first few months of 2020.

Lawmakers will need to juggle policy battles, including Trump’s expected request for border wall funding, with the growing influence of the 2020 presidential race, all under a truncated election-year congressional schedule.

House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerDemocrats seek wave to bolster House majority Hoyer lays out ambitious Democratic agenda for 2021, with health care at top Top Democrats introduce resolution calling for mask mandate, testing program in Senate MORE (D-Md.) outlined an ambitious timeline, saying he hoped Congress will pass all 12 of the fiscal 2021 funding bills before Oct. 1. Unlike last year, lawmakers already have the top-line spending figures for both defense and non-defense as part of the two-year budget agreement, giving them a head start of sorts.

Senate Republicans, while saying they agreed with the spirit of Hoyer’s goal, said Congress was unlikely to meet the timeline. Sen. John CornynJohn CornynGOP sees path to hold Senate majority Cook moves Texas to 'toss-up' Biden pushes into Trump territory MORE (R-Texas) said he was “skeptical.”

“I think the election will decide a lot of that,” he added.