McConnell challenger McGrath pens op-ed about authorization for the use of military force

McConnell challenger McGrath pens op-ed about authorization for the use of military force

Amy McGrath, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHillicon Valley: Facebook considers political ad ban | Senators raise concerns over civil rights audit | Amazon reverses on telling workers to delete TikTok Ernst: Renaming Confederate bases is the 'right thing to do' despite 'heck' from GOP Advocacy groups pressure Senate to reconvene and boost election funding MORE's (R) Democratic challenger in Kentucky's Senate race this year, authored a USA Today op-ed Tuesday urging Congress to revise the authorization for use of military force (AUMF) amid increased saber rattling with Iran.

McGrath, a former Marine fighter pilot, wrote that the U.S. is running on "legislative fumes" 19 years after the AUMF was passed by Congress to give former President George W. Bush the authority to go to war with the perpetrators of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

"We cannot tie the hands of this or any future commander in chief in a way that could leave the nation even temporarily defenseless. But that does not mean that this or any president gets a blank check," McGrath said.


The 44-year-old also emphasized the importance of Congress expanding its role on Iran, which earlier this month struck Iraqi bases housing U.S. troops in retaliation for the death of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, who was killed in a U.S. drone strike.

"It is imperative that Congress get involved in the Iran debate — demand more in-depth intelligence briefings, conduct hearings on potential developments, debate long-term Iran strategies publicly and be forced to cast tough votes — which is why they were elected in the first place," she wrote.

McGrath accuses McConnell of "rubber-stamping" the plans "of an impulsive administration without any clear plan or strategy."

The Senate hopeful concludes her op-ed by saying that the U.S. "deserves leaders who take this responsibility seriously, regardless of political party and regardless of who sits in the Oval Office."

Following the drone strike in Iraq that killed Soleimani, the House, along party lines, passed a war powers resolution that would prohibit President TrumpDonald John TrumpDeSantis on Florida schools reopening: 'If you can do Walmart,' then 'we absolutely can do schools' NYT editorial board calls for the reopening of schools with help from federal government's 'checkbook' Mueller pens WaPo op-ed: Roger Stone 'remains a convicted felon, and rightly so' MORE from ordering any further military action against Iran unless American assets were under threat of "imminent" attack.


However, the bill hasn't gone anywhere in the Senate and isn't expected to.

The Trump administration cited the 2001 Iraq AUMF as its reasoning for taking out Soleimani, despite Iran's lack of involvement in the 9/11 attacks.  

—Updated Wednesday at 4:10 p.m.