John BoltonJohn BoltonWe've left Afghanistan — but its consequences are just starting to arrive It's time to pull the plug on our toxic relationship with Pakistan Overnight Defense & National Security — Milley becomes lightning rod MORE and his publishing team are denying any claims that they leaked details of the former national security adviser's unpublished manuscript to The New York Times following a bombshell report in the newspaper Sunday night.
The Times first reported that Bolton's book will say President TrumpDonald TrumpRobert Gates says 'extreme polarization' is the greatest threat to US democracy Cassidy says he won't vote for Trump if he runs in 2024 Schiff says holding Bannon in criminal contempt 'a way of getting people's attention' MORE wanted to withhold nearly $400 million in U.S. aid to Ukraine until the country's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, committed to opening investigations, including into former Vice President Joe BidenJoe BidenManchin lays down demands for child tax credit: report Abrams targets Black churchgoers during campaign stops for McAuliffe in Virginia Pentagon, State Department square off on Afghanistan accountability MORE, a 2020 political rival.
The report came one day before the White House defense team was set to begin its second day of arguments fighting against the impeachment charges brought forward by House Democrats. The timing has led some Republicans to raise questions about the report.
But Bolton and his team say "categorically" in a statement that did not work with the Times to publish such details.
Still, the Times report has sparked a wave of reactions on Capitol Hill, with Democrats stepping up their calls for witnesses to testify.
And some Republicans on Monday appeared increasingly open to the idea of hearing Bolton and other witnesses testify following news of the report.
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) recently said that “it’s very likely” he’ll vote for additional witnesses.
But it's unclear if Democrats will get the four Republican votes needed to call witnesses. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHoyer signals House vote on bill to 'remove' debt limit threat Biden signs bill to raise debt ceiling On The Money — Progressives play hard ball on Biden budget plan MORE (R-Ky.) and other Republicans have been against the idea, arguing that the House should've subpoenaed Bolton during their impeachment inquiry rather than wait until the Senate trial to pursue such evidence.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffSchiff says holding Bannon in criminal contempt 'a way of getting people's attention' Schiff: McCarthy 'will do whatever Trump tells him' if GOP wins back House Jan. 6 panel to pursue criminal contempt referral for Bannon MORE (D-Calif.), the lead impeachment manager, has defended not subpoenaing Bolton, arguing that they would've still be fighting the former Trump official in the courts for his testimony if they had gone down that path.
Schiff on Monday told reporters that in order for the Senate to give a fair trial over Trump's contacts with Ukraine, they must be able to call Bolton and other witnesses to testify.