GOP predicts Roberts won't cast tie-breaking vote on witnesses

Republicans are signaling confidence that Chief Justice John Roberts will not insert himself into the middle of the looming fight over witnesses at President TrumpDonald TrumpTrump: LeBron James's 'racist rants' are divisive, nasty North Carolina man accused of fraudulently obtaining .5M in PPP loans Biden announces picks to lead oceans, lands agencies MORE’s impeachment trial. 

GOP senators are cautiously optimistic they will be able to fend off any effort to call new witnesses. But with several of their colleagues still undecided ahead of Friday’s vote, the possibility of a 50-50 tie is seen as the one remaining wildcard in a trial whose outcome is all but certain to end in acquittal.

Roberts, who didn’t respond to a question this week about possibly casting the deciding vote, is facing pressure from Democrats to allow witnesses, after they unsuccessfully attempted to insert a similar provision in the impeachment rules.


But GOP senators say they do not believe Roberts will, or even should, cast the make-or-break vote on witnesses, arguing it would be a departure from how they view his role, as ceremonial arbitrator, and put the chief justice in the middle of a fierce political fight in an election year. 

Sen. Josh HawleyJoshua (Josh) David HawleyHawley votes against anti-Asian hate crime bill Senate passes anti-Asian hate crimes bill On The Money: Senate GOP faces post-Trump spending brawl | Senate confirms SEC chief Gensler to full five-year term | Left-leaning group raises concerns about SALT cap repeal MORE (R-Mo.) acknowledged that he had not spoken to Roberts about the issue, but predicted the chief justice would not put himself at the center of the witness battle.

“I certainly think it’s a very fraught topic,” Hawley said. “I would guess that he would not break a tie.” 

Senate Rules Committee Chairman Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntGOP attorneys general group in turmoil after Jan. 6 Trump rally Senate GOP keeps symbolic earmark ban St. Louis lawyer who pointed gun at Black Lives Matter protesters considering Senate run MORE (R-Mo.) said a 50-50 vote would mean the push for witnesses failed. 

Asked if he thought Roberts would break the tie, Blunt responded: “He would not.” 

Sen. Mike BraunMichael BraunNew signs of progress emerge on police reform Tim Scott: 'No question' Floyd jury reached 'the right verdict' Overnight Energy: Biden reportedly will pledge to halve US emissions by 2030 | Ocasio-Cortez, Markey reintroduce Green New Deal resolution MORE (R-Ind.) indicated Roberts shouldn’t break a tie, noting “he would be taking a side there” if he did.


Meanwhile, Sen. John CornynJohn CornynCornyn, Sinema unveil bill aimed at confronting border surge US Chamber of Commerce comes out in support of bipartisan, bicameral immigration bill GOP sees immigration as path to regain power MORE (R-Texas), an adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellTim Scott to deliver GOP response to Biden's speech to Congress GOP state attorneys general urge Biden, Congress not to expand Supreme Court The Memo: Washington's fake debate on 'bipartisanship' MORE (R-Ky.), argued there was no specific language that allowed Roberts to vote and break a tie.

“He doesn’t have any role other than to ceremonially preside,” Cornyn said.

Roberts inserted himself into the impeachment trial as senators were debating the trial rules last week. After a heated back-and-forth between House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHillicon Valley: Tech companies duke it out at Senate hearing | Seven House Republicans vow to reject donations from Big Tech Wyden-Paul bill would close loophole allowing feds to collect private data Jim Jordan, Val Demings get in shouting match about police during hearing MORE (D-N.Y.) and Jay SekulowJay Alan SekulowThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by TikTok - New video of riot unnerves many senators Trump legal switch hints at larger problems Trump, House GOP relationship suddenly deteriorates MORE, Trump’s personal attorney, Roberts called out both sides for their rhetoric.

“It is appropriate at this point for me to admonish both the House managers and president’s counsel in equal terms to remember that they are addressing the world’s greatest deliberative body,” Roberts warned during a middle-of-the-night debate. 

But since then Roberts has largely taken a passive role in the impeachment proceedings, only weighing in on Tuesday to indicate to Trump’s legal team and the House managers that he would like them to keep their responses to five minutes during the two-day question-and-answer session. 

The swirl of speculation around Roberts comes as McConnell scrambles to lock down the 51 votes needed to block new trial witnesses. 

Whether or not Roberts is willing to break a tie has consequences for the Republican whip effort. If Roberts were to signal he would break a tie and side with Democrats to allow witnesses, McConnell would need 51 senators to have an outright majority. That would allow him to lose no more than two Republican senators.

If Roberts did not break a tie, that would allow McConnell to still block witnesses if the vote was 50-50. 

Several GOP senators — including Sens. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsHawley votes against anti-Asian hate crime bill Senate passes anti-Asian hate crimes bill Senate to vote next week on repealing Trump methane rule  MORE (Maine), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Chauvin conviction puts renewed focus on police reform GOP sees immigration as path to regain power Harris casts tiebreaking vote to advance Biden nominee MORE (Alaska), Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderSenate GOP faces retirement brain drain The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by the National Shooting Sports Foundation - CDC news on gatherings a step toward normality Blunt's retirement deals blow to McConnell inner circle MORE (Tenn.) and Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyChipotle says raising minimum wage would mean 'manageable' menu price hike GOP senator introduces bill to make DC part of Maryland McDaniel told RNC officials she has considered bid for Michigan governor MORE (Utah) — have not yet revealed their position on an initial vote to allow witnesses. 

Romney has said he wants to hear from former national security adviser John BoltonJohn BoltonTrump pushes back on Bolton poll Hillicon Valley: Facebook Oversight board to rule on Trump ban in 'coming weeks' | Russia blocks Biden Cabinet officials in retaliation for sanctions Russia blocks key Biden Cabinet officials from entering in retaliation for sanctions MORE, while Collins has characterized herself as “very likely” to support calling witnesses. Both have stressed they will make a final decision after senators ask questions on Wednesday and Thursday.

“I have no idea how the votes are going to fall,” Collins told reporters on Wednesday.

If both Collins and Romney vote for witnesses, that would still leave McConnell with 51 GOP votes.


In normal Senate procedure, a 50-50 tie could be broken by Vice President Pence. But Pence does not have a role in the impeachment trial, kicking the issue over to Roberts.

There were no ties in the 1999 Clinton trial, but Chief Justice Salmon Chase broke two ties during President Andrew Johnson’s impeachment trial in 1868.

Democrats tried but failed to get language in the rules resolution that would allow Roberts to rule on motions for new witnesses or documents.

An amendment offered by Sen. Chris Van HollenChristopher (Chris) Van HollenSherrod Brown: Teenager killed in Columbus police shooting 'should be alive right now' Democrats renew push for George Floyd Justice in Policing Act Democratic senators call on Biden to support waiving vaccine patents MORE (D-Md.) stated: “The Presiding Officer shall rule to authorize the subpoena of any witness or any document that a Senator or a party moves to subpoena if the Presiding Officer determines that the witness or document is likely to have probative evidence relevant to either article of impeachment before the Senate.”

A Senate Democratic aide noted at the time that the resolution was not intended to allow Roberts to break a tie, but instead make a ruling on requests for witnesses or documents. If the Senate disagreed, they could overrule him if they had 51 votes.

The Senate rejected Van Hollen’s amendment in a 53-47 party line vote.


If Roberts injects himself into the middle of the witness fight, it would hardly be the first time he’s rankled Republicans.

Roberts last year sided with the court’s liberal wing to invalidate the Trump administration’s decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census. In 2012, he sparked fierce backlash from conservatives when he sided with Democratic-appointed justices to uphold ObamaCare’s individual mandate.

But Democrats are keeping up the pressure for Roberts to take the reins of what new witnesses or documents are allowed or not allowed.

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerSenate to vote next week on repealing Trump methane rule  Joe Lieberman to push senators on DC statehood On The Money: Yellen touts 'whole-of-economy' plan to fight climate change | Senate GOP adopts symbolic earmark ban, digs in on debt limit MORE (D-N.Y.) knocked Republicans for trying to box out Roberts, saying they were “afraid of any independent analysis.” 

“The Senate rules would allow the Senate to overrule Roberts, but the weight of his ruling would matter,” Schumer added when asked if Roberts should “step in.” 

“And we liked that,” he said. “And we hoped that could happen.”