Congress pours cold water on Trump's payroll tax cut

President TrumpDonald John TrumpMulvaney: 'We've overreacted a little bit' to coronavirus Former CBS News president: Most major cable news outlets 'unrelentingly liberal' in 'fear and loathing' of Trump An old man like me should be made more vulnerable to death by COVID-19 MORE’s push to cut the payroll tax as part of an effort to revive the economy is facing steep headwinds on Capitol Hill. 

Trump has spent days making the pitch publicly, as well as privately, as Washington is under growing pressure to try to shore up the stock market, which has plummeted this week over growing concerns about the growing coronavirus outbreak. 

House Democrats are set to unveil an economic response package that does not include a payroll tax cut. Meanwhile, Senate reactions range from deep skepticism to, in some cases, outright opposition, raising questions about whether a plan could ever reach Trump’s desk. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“I know that’s in the conversation … I would prefer they exercise other options before going down that path,” said Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - US death toll nears 100,000 as country grapples with reopening GOP faces internal conflicts on fifth coronavirus bill On The Money: Jobless rate exceeds 20 percent in three states | Senate goes on break without passing small business loan fix | Biden pledges to not raise taxes on those making under 0K MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Republican senator, while caveating that it's “too early” to make decisions on legislation. 

Sen. Mike BraunMichael BraunGOP faces internal conflicts on fifth coronavirus bill Hillicon Valley: Trump threatens Michigan, Nevada over mail-in voting | Officials call for broadband expansion during pandemic | Democrats call for investigation into Uber-Grubhub deal Republicans introduce bill to create legal 'safe harbor' for gig companies during the pandemic MORE (R-Ind.) predicted that a payroll tax cut would spark resistance not only from fiscal hawks but a broader swath of the Senate GOP caucus. 

“I think there are going to be a lot of fiscal conservatives, and I think that’s going to go deeper into the conference than normal,” Braun said, asked about opposition to the idea. “My gut is there’s going to be folks not interested in doing it quickly.”  

Asked if he was one of those who would be opposed to quickly passing a payroll tax cut, Braun added: “I would be one of them.” 

The skepticism from Republicans comes after Trump met behind closed doors with GOP senators during a closed-door caucus lunch on Tuesday. During the powwow, the president stressed that he wanted a payroll tax cut until the end of the year. He also floated the idea of zeroing out the payroll tax altogether until after the Nov. 3 election. 

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamWhy do Americans worry about North Korea? Senate confirms Ratcliffe to be Trump's spy chief Abrams announces endorsements in 7 Senate races MORE (R-S.C.) described the reaction within the Senate GOP proposal as “mixed.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

“I don't know if that's the best way to do it,” he said. “The president is pushing it.” 

Congress last extended a payroll tax cut package in 2012 during the Obama administration. 

“We are working out details right now, so I don’t want to quote any numbers ahead of time,” National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow told reporters. “I think the outline of the thing is very important. The payroll tax holiday is probably the most important powerful piece of this.”

But a proposal is unlikely to garner similarly strong bipartisan support this time around. 

Senate Democrats railed against a payroll tax during a press conference on Wednesday. 

Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenHillicon Valley: Tech companies lead way on WFH forever | States and counties plead for cybersecurity assistance | Trump weighing anti-conservative bias panel House to consider amendment blocking warrantless web browsing surveillance COVID-19 increases importance of implementing reforms to organ donation system MORE (Ore.), the senior Democrat on the Finance Committee, called Trump’s payroll tax proposal a “huge mistake” that would “amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts for big corporations.”

“What they want to do is hit Social Security like a wrecking ball with a massive tax cut for the country’s biggest corporations,” Wyden added. “We are going to oppose this with everything we have.”

“With respect to the Senate Finance Committee and our Democrats this will not happen. Period. Full Stop,” he added. 

And House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerThis week: Surveillance fight sets early test for House's proxy voting House conservatives voice concerns over minority rights during remote hearings House slated to vote on FISA before end of the month MORE (D-Md.) shot the idea down on Wednesday.

“I think it's a non-starter. The Republicans have expressed not much enthusiasm for that proposal either,” he said. 

Some experts have criticized the idea of a payroll tax cut because it would not help workers who could be laid off as part of an economic downturn sparked by the coronavirus. Democrats, instead, are focusing on policy proposals like paid sick leave and bolstering unemployment insurance. 

Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyGOP faces internal conflicts on fifth coronavirus bill State Department scrutiny threatens Pompeo's political ambitions Senators offer bill to prevent relief payments from being seized by private debt collectors MORE (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Finance Committee, acknowledged the likely opposition from Democrats on Wednesday, telling Bloomberg that the idea “does not have bipartisan support.” 

ADVERTISEMENT

Grassley stressed during a pen-and-pad with reporters that he was not ruling out a payroll tax cut, or any other idea. 

“It's just on the table, that's all there is,” he said. 

But other GOP senators appeared lukewarm to the general idea, indicating that Trump could face an uphill lift to sell members of his own party on the proposal. 

Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonHouse chair threatens subpoenas if Pompeo doesn't provide Biden docs he gave Senate GOP Senate confirms Ratcliffe to be Trump's spy chief Schumer dubs GOP 'conspiracy caucus' amid Obama-era probes MORE (R-Wis.) said the “path of least resistance” would be the administration and states focusing on steps they can take unilaterally or using resources they already have, before trying to get something through Congress. 

“The quickest way to get relief to American families is using existing authorities and existing funds,” Johnson said, asked if he supported a payroll tax cut. “Rather than trying to get something through this place.” 

Asked if he could support a payroll tax cut, Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyTop Republican says Trump greenlit budget fix for VA health care GOP senators not tested for coronavirus before lunch with Trump McConnell, GOP senators support exempting VA health funds from budget caps MORE (R-Ala.), the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, said he wants to see what gets proposed because “here’s a lot of things bandied around.” Sen. John CornynJohn CornynBottom line Five questions about the next COVID-19 relief package Hillicon Valley: Lawmakers demand answers on Chinese COVID hacks | Biden re-ups criticism of Amazon | House Dem bill seeks to limit microtargeting MORE (R-Texas) similarly kept his distance from the idea. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the details matter. I would be willing to consider it, but the details matter,” he added. “Not the least of which is how you're going to shore back up the Social Security trust fund, if you have a payroll tax holiday.” 

Sen. Kevin CramerKevin John CramerTrump tries to soothe anxious GOP senators Trump cites 'Obamagate' in urging GOP to get 'tough' on Democrats Obama tweets 'vote' after Trump promotes 'Obamagate' MORE (R-N.D.) said he wasn’t on board with the idea yet, but didn’t rule out that the administration could win him over. 

“I could be convinced to support it. ... I’d like to continue the discussion of whether we can combine it with other stimulus,” Cramer said. “The more I’ve heard about it, the warmer I am to it.” 

Asked if he thought it could pass as a stand-alone, Cramer predicted that wouldn’t happen: “It really just seems unlikely.” 

Niv Elis and Alexander Bolton contributed.