Congress pours cold water on Trump's payroll tax cut

President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden holds massive cash advantage over Trump ahead of Election Day Tax records show Trump maintains a Chinese bank account: NYT Trump plays video of Biden, Harris talking about fracking at Pennsylvania rally MORE’s push to cut the payroll tax as part of an effort to revive the economy is facing steep headwinds on Capitol Hill. 

Trump has spent days making the pitch publicly, as well as privately, as Washington is under growing pressure to try to shore up the stock market, which has plummeted this week over growing concerns about the growing coronavirus outbreak. 

House Democrats are set to unveil an economic response package that does not include a payroll tax cut. Meanwhile, Senate reactions range from deep skepticism to, in some cases, outright opposition, raising questions about whether a plan could ever reach Trump’s desk. 


“I know that’s in the conversation … I would prefer they exercise other options before going down that path,” said Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneOn The Money: McConnell says he would give Trump-backed coronavirus deal a Senate vote | Pelosi, Mnuchin see progress, but no breakthrough | Trump, House lawyers return to court in fight over financial records Progress, but no breakthrough, on coronavirus relief McConnell says he would give Trump-backed coronavirus deal a vote in Senate MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Republican senator, while caveating that it's “too early” to make decisions on legislation. 

Sen. Mike BraunMichael BraunGOP lawmakers gloomy, back on defense after debate fiasco Romney calls first Trump-Biden debate 'an embarrassment' Supreme Court fight pushes Senate toward brink MORE (R-Ind.) predicted that a payroll tax cut would spark resistance not only from fiscal hawks but a broader swath of the Senate GOP caucus. 

“I think there are going to be a lot of fiscal conservatives, and I think that’s going to go deeper into the conference than normal,” Braun said, asked about opposition to the idea. “My gut is there’s going to be folks not interested in doing it quickly.”  

Asked if he was one of those who would be opposed to quickly passing a payroll tax cut, Braun added: “I would be one of them.” 

The skepticism from Republicans comes after Trump met behind closed doors with GOP senators during a closed-door caucus lunch on Tuesday. During the powwow, the president stressed that he wanted a payroll tax cut until the end of the year. He also floated the idea of zeroing out the payroll tax altogether until after the Nov. 3 election. 

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamDemocratic Senate campaign arm outraises GOP counterpart in September Hug or heresy? The left's attack on Dianne Feinstein is a sad sign of our times Democrats seem unlikely to move against Feinstein MORE (R-S.C.) described the reaction within the Senate GOP proposal as “mixed.” 


“I don't know if that's the best way to do it,” he said. “The president is pushing it.” 

Congress last extended a payroll tax cut package in 2012 during the Obama administration. 

“We are working out details right now, so I don’t want to quote any numbers ahead of time,” National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow told reporters. “I think the outline of the thing is very important. The payroll tax holiday is probably the most important powerful piece of this.”

But a proposal is unlikely to garner similarly strong bipartisan support this time around. 

Senate Democrats railed against a payroll tax during a press conference on Wednesday. 

Sen. Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee Wyden Senate Democrats call for ramped up Capitol coronavirus testing House Democrats slam FCC chairman over 'blatant attempt to help' Trump FCC to move forward with considering executive order targeting tech's liability shield MORE (Ore.), the senior Democrat on the Finance Committee, called Trump’s payroll tax proposal a “huge mistake” that would “amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts for big corporations.”

“What they want to do is hit Social Security like a wrecking ball with a massive tax cut for the country’s biggest corporations,” Wyden added. “We are going to oppose this with everything we have.”

“With respect to the Senate Finance Committee and our Democrats this will not happen. Period. Full Stop,” he added. 

And House Majority Leader Steny HoyerSteny Hamilton HoyerTop Democrats introduce resolution calling for mask mandate, testing program in Senate Trump orders aides to halt talks on COVID-19 relief This week: Coronavirus complicates Senate's Supreme Court fight MORE (D-Md.) shot the idea down on Wednesday.

“I think it's a non-starter. The Republicans have expressed not much enthusiasm for that proposal either,” he said. 

Some experts have criticized the idea of a payroll tax cut because it would not help workers who could be laid off as part of an economic downturn sparked by the coronavirus. Democrats, instead, are focusing on policy proposals like paid sick leave and bolstering unemployment insurance. 

Sen. Chuck GrassleyCharles (Chuck) Ernest GrassleyGOP noncommittal about vote on potential Trump-Pelosi coronavirus deal Republicans: Supreme Court won't toss ObamaCare Barrett sidesteps Democratic questions amid high-stakes grilling MORE (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Finance Committee, acknowledged the likely opposition from Democrats on Wednesday, telling Bloomberg that the idea “does not have bipartisan support.” 


Grassley stressed during a pen-and-pad with reporters that he was not ruling out a payroll tax cut, or any other idea. 

“It's just on the table, that's all there is,” he said. 

But other GOP senators appeared lukewarm to the general idea, indicating that Trump could face an uphill lift to sell members of his own party on the proposal. 

Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonSunday shows preview: Coronavirus cases surge in the Midwest; Trump hits campaign trail after COVID-19 Cuomo signs legislation declaring Juneteenth an official holiday in New York Trailing in polls, Trump campaign resurrects Hunter Biden attacks MORE (R-Wis.) said the “path of least resistance” would be the administration and states focusing on steps they can take unilaterally or using resources they already have, before trying to get something through Congress. 

“The quickest way to get relief to American families is using existing authorities and existing funds,” Johnson said, asked if he supported a payroll tax cut. “Rather than trying to get something through this place.” 

Asked if he could support a payroll tax cut, Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyOn The Money: GOP cool to White House's .6T coronavirus price tag | Company layoffs mount as pandemic heads into fall | Initial jobless claims drop to 837,000 GOP cool to White House's .6T coronavirus price tag The Hill's Morning Report - Sponsored by Facebook - Republicans lawmakers rebuke Trump on election MORE (R-Ala.), the chairman of the Appropriations Committee, said he wants to see what gets proposed because “here’s a lot of things bandied around.” Sen. John CornynJohn Cornyn'Seinfeld' cast members reuniting for Texas Democratic Party fundraiser Senate GOP eyes Oct. 26 for confirming Barrett to Supreme Court GOP noncommittal about vote on potential Trump-Pelosi coronavirus deal MORE (R-Texas) similarly kept his distance from the idea. 


“I think the details matter. I would be willing to consider it, but the details matter,” he added. “Not the least of which is how you're going to shore back up the Social Security trust fund, if you have a payroll tax holiday.” 

Sen. Kevin CramerKevin John CramerGOP cool to White House's .6T coronavirus price tag Romney calls first Trump-Biden debate 'an embarrassment' Netflix distances from author's comments about Muslim Uyghurs but defends project MORE (R-N.D.) said he wasn’t on board with the idea yet, but didn’t rule out that the administration could win him over. 

“I could be convinced to support it. ... I’d like to continue the discussion of whether we can combine it with other stimulus,” Cramer said. “The more I’ve heard about it, the warmer I am to it.” 

Asked if he thought it could pass as a stand-alone, Cramer predicted that wouldn’t happen: “It really just seems unlikely.” 

Niv Elis and Alexander Bolton contributed.