Republicans threaten to slow walk coronavirus stimulus bill over unemployment provision

A group of Republican senators are warning they will oppose fast-tracking a mammoth coronavirus stimulus package as they push for changes to a "drafting error" related to the bill's bolstered unemployment benefits.

Sens. Tim ScottTimothy (Tim) Eugene ScottThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Trump takes on CDC over schools Finger-pointing, gridlock spark frustration in Senate Tim Scott says he's talking with House Democrats about reviving police reform bill MORE (R-S.C.), Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamRomney blasts Trump's Stone commutation: 'Historic corruption' Lincoln Project offers list of GOP senators who 'protect' Trump in new ad The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Trump backs another T stimulus, urges governors to reopen schools MORE (R-S.C.) and Ben SasseBenjamin (Ben) Eric SasseKoch-backed group urges Senate to oppose 'bailouts' of states in new ads Chamber of Commerce endorses Cornyn for reelection Trump administration narrows suspects in Russia bounties leak investigation: report MORE (R-Neb.) said there was a "massive drafting error" within the package that would have "devastating consequences."

"Unless this bill is fixed, there is a strong incentive for employees to be laid off instead of going to work. ... We must sadly oppose the fast-tracking of this bill until this text is addressed, or the Department of Labor issues regulatory guidance that no American would earn more by not working than by working," the three senators said in a statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), who joined the other three senators at a press conference on the issue Wednesday, added in a tweet that "we shouldn’t have policies in place that disincentivize people from returning to the workforce."

Senate leadership want to pass the stimulus package on Wednesday, but that requires the cooperation of every senator. If Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHillicon Valley: Facebook considers political ad ban | Senators raise concerns over civil rights audit | Amazon reverses on telling workers to delete TikTok Ernst: Renaming Confederate bases is the 'right thing to do' despite 'heck' from GOP Advocacy groups pressure Senate to reconvene and boost election funding MORE (R-Ky.) is not able to get a deal, opponents could drag out the bills for days.

Pressed on whether they would force McConnell to go through all the procedural hoops, Tim Scott sidestepped, saying: "I am very hopeful we will get this done very quickly."

They are asking for an amendment vote that would cap unemployment benefits at 100 percent of an individual's income. The senators indicated if they could get an amendment vote, they would let the bill be sped up even if it failed.

"I think we need to fix this now because it only makes the problem worse," Graham said. "I want an amendment vote. We'll see what happens."

ADVERTISEMENT

Unemployment insurance was one of the biggest sticking points of the days-long Senate negotiations.

The Senate agreement includes four months of bolstered unemployment benefits—a deal that was worked out by Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerDemocrats blast Trump for commuting Roger Stone: 'The most corrupt president in history' A renewed emphasis on research and development funding is needed from the government Data shows seven Senate Democrats have majority non-white staffs MORE (D-N.Y.), McConnell and Treasury Secretary Steven MnuchinSteven Terner MnuchinOn The Money: Supreme Court upholds NY prosecutors' access to Trump's tax returns, rebuffs Congress | Trump complains of 'political prosecution' | Biden rebukes Trump, rolls out jobs plan Mnuchin: Next stimulus bill must cap jobless benefits at 100 percent of previous income Why Trump can't make up his mind on China MORE.

A GOP aide pushed back against the four senators, underscoring the divisions within the caucus, saying that "nothing in this bill incentivizes businesses to lay off employees, in fact it’s just the opposite."

"Each state has a different UI program, so the drafters opted for a temporary across-the-board UI boost of $600 dollars, which can deliver needed aid in a timely manner rather than burning time to create a different administrative regime for each state. This increase is designed to make the average worker whole. It’s also important to remember that nobody who voluntarily leaves an available job is eligible for UI. Staff continue to work with the Department of Labor to ensure that it is administered as intended," the aide added.

Schumer wrote in a letter to his colleagues that the "extended UI program in this agreement increases the maximum unemployment benefit by $600 per week and ensures that laid-off workers, on average, will receive their full pay for four months."

ADVERTISEMENT

"It ensures that all workers are protected whether they work for businesses small, medium or large, along with self-employed and workers in the gig economy,"  Schumer added.

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyConnecticut senators call for Subway to ban open carry of firearms Democrats optimistic about chances of winning Senate Gridlock mires chances of police reform deal MORE (D-Conn.) tweeted: “Let's not over-complicate this. Several Republican Senators are holding up the bipartisan Coronavirus emergency bill because they think the bill is too good for laid off Americans.”

GOP senators say they discovered the "error" during a 92-minute conference call Republicans held on Wednesday morning on the bill when they asked for details on the unemployment benefits.

"When Republicans were on a conference call for 92 minutes this morning, a lot of us learned for the first time that an assurance we had been given in other settings maybe wasn't so and that assurance was that you wouldn't actually fail to cap this," Sasse told reporters.

They warn that the formula could "incentivize" individuals who make less working than they would with the enhanced unemployment to quit their job.

"We cannot encourage people to make more money in unemployment than they do in employment," Tim Scott told reporters during a press conference.

"This bill pays you more not to work than if you were working," Graham added.

"If this is not a drafting error, then this is the worst idea that I've seen in a long time."

—This report was updated at 3:20 p.m.