GOP faces internal conflicts on fifth coronavirus bill

Republicans are increasingly saying they expect to pass a fifth coronavirus bill — just don’t ask them to agree, yet, on what should be in it. 

While a growing number of GOP senators say they should move quickly, deep divisions remain within the caucus on everything from key policy provisions and timing to if another bill should be passed at all. 

“I don't think there’s a consensus yet on a path forward,” said Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneDobbs: Republicans lost in 2020 because they 'forgot who was the true leader' Senate GOP signals it's likely to acquit Trump for second time Just five GOP senators vote Trump impeachment trial is constitutional MORE (S.D.), the No. 2 Senate Republican.


Congress has already appropriated approximately $2.8 trillion, including a $2.2 trillion package that was signed into law on March 27 and an “interim” $484 billion bill that cleared in late April. 

Since then, members of GOP leadership hit “pause” on additional legislation as they reviewed the previous spending and privately discussed what they should do as the coronavirus continues to cause deep economic damage. 

“I don’t think we’re close at all,” said Sen. Mike BraunMichael BraunBiden signals he's willing to delay Trump trial McConnell proposes postponing impeachment trial until February The Hill's Morning Report - Biden takes office, calls for end to 'uncivil war' MORE (R-Ind.). “We’d have to have sessions like we did on March 23, 24, 25, over that weekend, and there’s no dynamic like that going on that I’m aware of.” 

Asked if there was a proposal, besides liability protection, that had broad support within the caucus, Sen. Roy BluntRoy Dean BluntJust five GOP senators vote Trump impeachment trial is constitutional Trump, allies raise pressure on Senate GOP ahead of impeachment This week: Senate stuck in limbo MORE (R-Mo.), a member of leadership, said, “I truthfully don’t know that we’re to that point yet.”

“[We need] to figure out what we need in the second quarter ... the months of, say, July, August and September that would be different than what we needed in April and May and June,” Blunt added. “I don’t think we know, and I don’t think we should be expected to know right now.” 

The GOP brainstorming comes as Democrats have clamored for Congress to pass another large-scale coronavirus relief package. The House passed a roughly $3 trillion bill earlier this month, which has been declared “dead on arrival” in the Senate. It is expected to take up additional coronavirus-related legislation when it returns on Wednesday. 


Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHumanist Report host criticizes 'conservative Democrats:' They 'hold more power' than progressives Dobbs: Republicans lost in 2020 because they 'forgot who was the true leader' Biden's Cabinet gradually confirmed by Senate MORE (R-Ky.) has advocated for a wait-and-see approach as some states begin to lift social distancing restrictions. When Republicans should move forward has sparked conflicting opinions from McConnell’s members. 

Sen. Cory GardnerCory GardnerOvernight Defense: Joint Chiefs denounce Capitol attack | Contractors halt donations after siege | 'QAnon Shaman' at Capitol is Navy vet Lobbying world Senate swears-in six new lawmakers as 117th Congress convenes MORE (R-Colo.), one of two GOP senators up for reelection in a state President TrumpDonald TrumpBlinken holds first calls as Biden's secretary of State Senators discussing Trump censure resolution Dobbs: Republicans lost in 2020 because they 'forgot who was the true leader' MORE lost in 2016, broke rank late last week to question why the Senate was leaving town for a weeklong Memorial Day recess without passing additional coronavirus legislation. 

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsSenators discussing Trump censure resolution Senate GOP signals it's likely to acquit Trump for second time Just five GOP senators vote Trump impeachment trial is constitutional MORE (R-Maine), the other GOP senator on the ballot in a state Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonEverytown urges Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to resign over newly uncovered remarks Marjorie Taylor Greene expressed support on Facebook for violence against Democrats McConnell last spoke to Trump on Dec. 15 MORE won in 2016, also threw her support behind staying. 

But the push to stay in through the recess specifically for the coronavirus puzzled other Republicans. 

Braun noted that he wasn’t opposed to coming back to Washington, but that wasn't a sign lawmakers would be ready to do coronavirus legislation.

“I think you’d have individuals scratching their heads ... because there’s been no basic platform thrown out there,” he said. 

Thune called the timeline “highly unlikely,” adding, “We could stay. ... We could continue to do nominations.” 

Sen. Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleySenate sworn in as jurors for Trump impeachment trial GOP digs in on preserving Trump tax cuts On The Money: Treasury announces efforts to help people get stimulus payments | Senate panel unanimously advances Yellen nomination for Treasury | Judge sets ground rules for release of Trump taxes MORE (R-Iowa), the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, predicted that serious negotiations wouldn’t get underway until the third or fourth week of June. 

“What are we doing right now thinking about what we’re going to do in the next virus bill ... without knowing where we are now?” Grassley asked.

McConnell hasn’t said when he will move legislation, but he’s hinted the GOP holding pattern could soon be coming to an end. He told House Republicans during a conference call that they would maintain their current posture for “for a little longer,” according to a source briefed on the call. 

He added during a Fox News interview that there was a “high likelihood” that Congress would pass another bill but that time wasn’t quite ripe. 

“We're not quite ready to intelligently lay down the next step, but it's not too far off,” he said. 


Bringing the next bill to the forefront is all but guaranteed to put a spotlight on GOP divisions, which have been percolating in the closed-door lunches and on the Senate floor for weeks. 

“I know there’s sort of a sense to do something, but I think that the question is what's that something, and there's not a broad agreement on that,” Thune said. 

One of the biggest points of division is help for state and local governments, which have been hit hard as businesses have shuttered, depriving them of a lucrative tax base. 

A bipartisan group of senators is pushing for Congress to provide an additional $500 billion to state and local governments, including allowing some of the funding to go toward revenue replacement. 

“Congress has a tremendous responsibility to help mitigate the impact of this crisis on our states and our local communities and on the families they serve. We must not wait. We should act now,” Collins said, pleading with her colleagues to pass legislation. 

But greenlighting more funding to states, or even providing more flexibility to the $150 billion Congress has already passed, is anathema to some Republicans who have warned about states trying to use the money to cover bad budget decisions. 


Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has blocked an attempt by Sen. John KennedyJohn Neely KennedyMORE (R-La.) to bring up legislation to give states more flexibility three times. 

“I know that some on my side of the aisle disagree with me,” Kennedy acknowledged during his third attempt to get the bill a vote. 

But GOP senators will also need to work out how to address unemployment insurance, which got beefed up during the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security, or CARES, Act. McConnell told House Republicans, and reiterated during the Fox News interview, that the next bill will not continue the extra $600 per week implemented in the March bill. Nearly 39 million have filed for unemployment since the start of the pandemic. 

Some powerful chairmen, including Blunt and Sen. Roger WickerRoger Frederick WickerSenators vet Buttigieg to run Transportation Department Wall Street Journal: GOP Electoral College 'stunt' will hurt US, Republican Party Bipartisan group of senators: The election is over MORE (R-Miss.), are pushing to include an infrastructure package, something McConnell indicated late last month would not make the cut.

And even largely bipartisan fixes to the Paycheck Protection Program have hit snags. Sens. Marco RubioMarco Antonio RubioOVERNIGHT ENERGY: Court upholds ruling invalidating Dakota Access, but doesn't shut down pipeline | Schumer calls for Biden to declare climate emergency | Biden seeks to bolster consultation with Indian Country The Memo: Chances recede of GOP breaking with Trump Schumer calls for Biden to declare climate emergency MORE (R-Fla.), Ben CardinBenjamin (Ben) Louis CardinOn The Money: GOP digs in on defending Trump tax cuts | Democrats bullish on raising minimum wage | Financial sector braces for Biden's consumer bureau pick The Hill's Morning Report - Biden argues for legislative patience, urgent action amid crisis The Hill's Morning Report - Biden: Focus on vaccine, virus, travel MORE (D-Md.), Jeanne ShaheenCynthia (Jeanne) Jeanne ShaheenModerates vow to 'be a force' under Biden Bipartisan Senate gang to talk with Biden aide on coronavirus relief Bipartisan group of senators: The election is over MORE (D-N.H.) and Collins introduced legislation that would extend the period of time businesses have to spend the loans from eight weeks to 16 weeks. The bill had support from leadership in both parties, but Rubio disclosed on Friday that at least one office had objected and prevented the bill from passing without a vote.

McConnell has largely been tight-lipped about what he wants in the next bill except for his “red line” on including liability protections for employers. And he’s pledged that Senate Republicans will be in lockstep with the White House. 


“There will be no space between the White House and Senate Republicans on the next bill,” he told Fox News. 

Trump was asked by Kennedy during a closed-door lunch last week what his time frame was for the next bill and what should be in it. 

“The president gave a very vague, artful answer,” Kennedy said. “That’s not a criticism. That doesn’t mean he doesn’t have a plan, but it was clear to me he’s not ready to tell us what it is.”