Senate rejects broad restrictions on transfers of military-grade equipment to police

Senate rejects broad restrictions on transfers of military-grade equipment to police
© Getty Images

The Senate on Tuesday rejected a proposal to place broad restrictions on the transfer of military-grade equipment to local police departments.

Senators voted 51-49 on an amendment, spearheaded by Sen. Brian SchatzBrian Emanuel SchatzMinimum wage setback revives progressive calls to nix Senate filibuster Little known Senate referee to play major role on Biden relief plan Bipartisan group of lawmakers proposes bill to lift rule putting major financial burden on USPS MORE (D-Hawaii), to a mammoth defense bill, falling short of the 60 votes needed.

GOP Sens. Steve DainesSteven (Steve) David DainesSusan Collins to back Haaland's Interior nomination OVERNIGHT ENERGY: House Democrats reintroduce road map to carbon neutrality by 2050 | Kerry presses oil companies to tackle climate change | Biden delays transfer of sacred lands for copper mine Indigenous groups post billboards urging senators to confirm Deb Haaland MORE (Mont.), Cory GardnerCory GardnerBiden administration reverses Trump changes it says 'undermined' conservation program Gardner to lead new GOP super PAC ahead of midterms OVERNIGHT ENERGY: Court rules against fast-track of Trump EPA's 'secret science' rule | Bureau of Land Management exodus: Agency lost 87 percent of staff in Trump HQ relocation | GM commits to electric light duty fleet by 2035 MORE (Colo.), Lisa MurkowskiLisa Ann MurkowskiSenate rejects Sanders minimum wage hike The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Virus relief bill headed for weekend vote Hillicon Valley: YouTube to restore Trump's account | House-passed election bill takes aim at foreign interference | Senators introduce legislation to create international tech partnerships MORE (Alaska) and Rand PaulRandal (Rand) Howard PaulWhite House open to reforming war powers amid bipartisan push House approves George Floyd Justice in Policing Act Bipartisan group of senators introduces bill to rein in Biden's war powers MORE (Ky.) supported the amendment.


Schatz’s proposals included broad limits on what can’t be transferred, including tracked combat vehicles, weaponized drones, bayonets, grenade launchers and certain gases including tear gas. Schatz's amendment would not have prohibited the transfer of defensive equipment. 

“Our amendment will permanently prohibit the transfer of lethal military weapons to police departments,” Schatz said ahead of the vote.

“Our communities are not battlefields. The American people are not enemy combatants,” he added.

The transfer of military-style equipment to local police departments has been in the spotlight amid scrutiny over the police response to recent protests sparked by the death of George Floyd while detained by police in Minneapolis.

Former President Obama curtailed the program in 2015 after local police suppressed protests in Ferguson, Mo., using military-grade equipment. But the Trump administration rescinded the restrictions in 2017.


Instead the Senate approved a narrower amendment from Sen. James InhofeJames (Jim) Mountain InhofeOvernight Defense: Capitol Police may ask National Guard to stay | Biden's Pentagon policy nominee faces criticism | Naval Academy midshipmen moved to hotels Top Republican: 'Outrageous' to extend National Guard deployment at Capitol Republicans blast Pentagon policy nominee over tweets, Iran nuclear deal MORE (R-Okla), the chairman of the Armed Services Committee, that only limits the transfer of bayonets, grenades, weaponized tracked combat vehicles and weaponized drones. Inhofe's amendment also requires law enforcement to be trained in de-escalation and citizens' constitutional rights.

Inhofe's amendment was added to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) in a 90-10 vote.

Inhofe, speaking before the vote, said he was against Schatz's amendment and argued that the program, known as 1033, is needed given the ongoing protests and riots.

"We need to be continuing this transparent, responsive program," he said. "People are trying to play down law enforcement, trying to break the law, trying to say it's acceptable. This has never happened before in America, but that's what we're seeing right now."