SPONSORED:

Schumer: 'Nothing is off the table' if GOP moves forward with Ginsburg replacement

Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerCowboys for Trump founder arrested following Capitol riot Graham calls on Schumer to hold vote to dismiss article of impeachment against Trump Biden and the new Congress must protect Americans from utility shutoffs MORE (D-N.Y.) told Democrats on Saturday that "nothing is off the table" if Republicans move forward this year with filling the Supreme Court vacancy created by Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader GinsburgRuth Bader Ginsburg, George Floyd among options for 'Remember the Titans' school's new name Bipartisan anger builds over police failure at Capitol Lindsey Graham praises Merrick Garland as 'sound choice' to serve as attorney general MORE's death.

"Let me be clear: If Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year. Nothing is off the table," Schumer told the Senate Democratic caucus, according to a source on the call.

The rare Saturday conference call comes as Senate Democrats are trying to strategize ahead of a looming election-year Supreme Court fight sparked by Ginsburg's death, which gives President TrumpDonald TrumpIran convicts American businessman on spying charge: report DC, state capitals see few issues, heavy security amid protest worries Pardon-seekers have paid Trump allies tens of thousands to lobby president: NYT MORE an opening to put a third justice on the court. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Schumer started the call with a moment of silence for Ginsburg, according to the source, and stressed the importance of talking about the "stakes" of the Supreme Court fight.

"Everything Americans value is at stake. Health care, protections for preexisting conditions, women's rights, gay rights, workers' rights, labor rights, voting rights, civil rights, climate change and so much else is at risk," Schumer said during the call, according to the source.

Trump is expected to move quickly to nominate someone to the seat, with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGraham calls on Schumer to hold vote to dismiss article of impeachment against Trump Rove: Chances of conviction rise if Giuliani represents Trump in Senate impeachment trial Boebert communications director resigns amid Capitol riot: report MORE (R-Ky.) vowing that whomever the president picks will get a vote. McConnell has not specified if he will try to move a nominee before the election or during the end-of-the-year session. 

The prospect that Republicans could try to fill the seat has energized progressive groups — with one planning to spend $10 million on the fight — and given a shot of momentum to talk among Democrats of nixing the legislative filibuster next year if they win the majority in November and expanding the Supreme Court.

"Mitch McConnell set the precedent. No Supreme Court vacancies filled in an election year. If he violates it, when Democrats control the Senate in the next Congress, we must abolish the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court," Sen. Ed MarkeyEd MarkeyFive centrist Democrats oppose Pelosi for Speaker in tight vote David Sirota: Democrats gave away leverage in forcing vote on ,000 checks Sanders to slow down NDAA veto override in bid to get vote on K checks proposal MORE (D-Mass.) tweeted.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rep. Jerry NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerPelosi names 9 impeachment managers Republicans gauge support for Trump impeachment Clyburn blasts DeVos and Chao for 'running away' from 25th Amendment fight MORE (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, added that if McConnell tries to confirm Trump's nominee during the end-of-year lame-duck session, "then the incoming Senate should immediately move to expand the Supreme Court."

"Filling the SCOTUS vacancy during a lame duck session, after the American people have voted for new leadership, is undemocratic and a clear violation of the public trust in elected officials. Congress would have to act and expanding the court would be the right place to start," Nadler added.

Talk of nixing the filibuster has gained traction with outside groups and a growing number of Democratic senators, as the party feels increasingly bullish about its ability to win the majority and the prospect that Democratic nominee Joe BidenJoe BidenFear of insider attack prompts additional FBI screening of National Guard troops: AP Iran convicts American businessman on spying charge: report DC, state capitals see few issues, heavy security amid protest worries MORE will win the White House.

If Democrats nix the 60-vote legislative filibuster, progressives have been pushing for reforms to the Supreme Court, including increasing the number of justices, an idea McConnell has used to warn about the pitfalls of a unified Democratic government.

'The far left is salivating over the prospect of killing the filibuster in order to pack the Supreme Court, pack the Senate with new states, tilt the playing field permanently so they can never lose power again," McConnell said from the Senate floor this week.

Schumer has not ruled out trying to get rid of the filibuster if Democrats are able to win the majority. Asked about the filibuster during a radio interview in August, Schumer said Democrats would "do what it takes" to enact their agenda if they win the Senate and Biden wins the White House.

"What we are saying, what I am saying, is ... we have a moral imperative to the people of America to get a whole lot done if we get the majority, which God willing we will, and keep it in the House, and Biden becomes president, and nothing is off the table," Schumer said in August.