Trump's push for $2K stimulus checks hits dead end in Senate

President TrumpDonald TrumpBiden heading to Kansas City to promote infrastructure package Trump calls Milley a 'f---ing idiot' over Afghanistan withdrawal First rally for far-right French candidate Zemmour prompts protests, violence MORE’s push to boost the amount of stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 appears to be dead in the water in the GOP-controlled Senate.

Trump is ramping up calls for Congress to increase the amount provided by a recently passed $2.3 trillion deal, an idea that quickly garnered support from Democratic leadership, some House Republicans and a growing number of Senate Republicans.

But a bill to increase the checks faces steep roadblocks — political, policy and procedural — that make it increasingly unlikely that lawmakers will get legislation to Trump’s desk by noon on Sunday, the deadline for the current Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellLawmakers remember Bob Dole: 'Bona fide American hero' Senate leaders face pushback on tying debt fight to defense bill Former Sen. Bob Dole dies at 98 MORE (R-Ky.) vowed that the Senate would not pass a stand-alone bill on checks, delivering a death knell to the already uphill chance that the House-passed bill could make it through Congress without significant changes.

"The Senate is not going to split apart the three issues that President Trump linked together just because Democrats are afraid to address two of them. The Senate is not going to be bullied into rushing out more borrowed money into the hands of Democrats' rich friends who don't need the help," McConnell said.

The GOP leader argued that the House-passed bill "does not align with what President Trump has suggested" and "has no realistic path to quickly pass the Senate."

Sen. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyBlack women look to build upon gains in coming elections Watch live: GOP senators present new infrastructure proposal Sasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment vote MORE (R-Pa.) and McConnell blocked the House measure on Wednesday, the second day in a row it’s faced setbacks. McConnell blocked the same legislation twice on Tuesday, when Senate Democratic Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerHospitals in underserved communities face huge cuts in reckless 'Build Back Better' plan GOP infighting takes stupid to a whole new level Progressive groups urge Schumer to prevent further cuts to T plan MORE (N.Y.) tried to pass it and when Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersWTO faces renewed scrutiny amid omicron threat Overnight Health Care — Presented by March of Dimes — Abortion access for 65M women at stake Hospitals in underserved communities face huge cuts in reckless 'Build Back Better' plan MORE (I-Vt.) attempted to set up a vote.

McConnell has offered a competing measure that would tie an increase in the checks to removing a legal shield for tech companies and creating a commission to examine the 2020 elections. But that proposal is viewed as a non-starter for Democrats, underscoring that the GOP leader’s bill also is unable to pass the Senate.

“There is no other game in town beside the House bill. ... The House has recessed for the year. Any modification or addition, the House bill cannot become law before the end of this Congress,” Schumer said.

ADVERTISEMENT

If the Senate passes anything besides the exact language of the House bill, the measure would need to bounce back across the Capitol and passed for a second time by the House, where lawmakers have already left town and aren’t expected to return until Sunday for the swearing in of the 117th Congress.

The stalemate all but guarantees that absent an eleventh-hour deal, the Senate is not likely to pass a checks proposal before noon on Sunday. If Congress fails to act before then, they’ll have to start all over.

The Senate was already going to need a deal just to get a checks vote because lawmakers are currently poised to debate a veto override of an unrelated defense bill until Saturday. Securing such an agreement, senators acknowledge, is highly unlikely.

Asked if a checks bill was not going to pass before Sunday’s deadline, Sen. John CornynJohn CornynSenate leaders face pushback on tying debt fight to defense bill House passes bill to expedite financial disclosures from judges McConnell leaves GOP in dark on debt ceiling MORE (R-Texas) said: “I think under the circumstances, I think that’s likely true.”

“They’re not willing to consider any other pieces, any other provisions in the bill ... and they want to spend the money on people who frankly haven’t suffered any financial losses during the pandemic,” he added.

Asked about potential political blowback against Republicans for preventing Americans from getting additional money, Cornyn added: “After we spent $4 trillion? No, not in any normal world.”

Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneThe Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Congress avoids shutdown Senate dodges initial December crisis with last-minute deal Congress averts shutdown after vaccine mandate fight MORE (R-S.D.), McConnell’s No. 2, added that it was difficult to see how the Senate could wrap up work on a checks proposal absent an agreement, which he acknowledged was unlikely.

“The Dems aren’t going to give us on [Section] 230 and I think on our side it’s probably hard to get consent on the checks,” he said.

The unraveling of the bipartisan push to increase the dollar amount for direct payments comes as the debate has sparked deep divisions among Senate Republicans, underscoring the difficulty supporters faced in getting a bill to Trump’s desk.

A handful of Senate Republicans have thrown their support behind the idea, including Sens. Kelly LoefflerKelly LoefflerPerdue to challenge Kemp in Georgia governor primary: report Senate GOP worries Trump could derail bid for majority Perdue mulling primary challenge against Kemp in Georgia: report MORE (Ga.) and David PerdueDavid PerduePerdue to challenge Kemp in Georgia governor primary: report Georgia becomes ground zero for 2022 elections The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden talks up bright side beneath omicron's cloud MORE (Ga.), who are fighting for their political lives in two runoff elections that will determine the Senate majority.

But several others are opposed to increasing the funding or have concerns about the structure of the House-passed bill. Because the House bill increased the amount of the checks while retaining the same phase-out structure, higher income households could be eligible for payments.

“I think it’s a very inefficient way,” Thune said, saying he opposed increasing the amount. “If we want to have a discussion about what more we can, I think we can do that next year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Lamar AlexanderLamar AlexanderMcConnell gets GOP wake-up call The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Alibaba - Democrats return to disappointment on immigration Authorities link ex-Tennessee governor to killing of Jimmy Hoffa associate MORE (R-Tenn.) argued that the recent bill passed by Congress was “targeted,” but “the problem with $2,000 is it's not targeted. It goes to people who didn’t lose any money during this.”

Toomey, who has vowed to block any attempt to vote on a checks bill, argued on Wednesday that it would be irresponsible for Congress to greenlight more money, part of which would go to individuals who have not lost their job during the coronavirus pandemic. 

“How does that make any sense at all?” he asked. 

Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyUS expected to announce diplomatic boycott of Beijing Olympics soon: report GOP anger with Fauci rises No deal in sight as Congress nears debt limit deadline MORE (R-Utah), the party’s 2012 presidential nominee, pointed to the cost of increasing the checks.

“Someone’s got to pay for that,” Romney said. “We can’t just have free money. There’s got to be taxation. We have to pay interest on the debt.”

McConnell offered his competing proposal by arguing it aligns with what Trump is seeking. In his signing statement on Sunday, Trump said the Senate would "start the process for a vote that increases checks to $2,000,” in addition to repealing Section 230 and starting “an investigation into voter fraud."

ADVERTISEMENT

But Republicans aren’t sold on tying Section 230 to the stimulus checks fight, especially after they left the tech battle out of the National Defense Authorization Act despite Trump’s demands.

Sen. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsPhotos of the Week: Schumer, ASU protest and sea turtles Real relief from high gas prices The Hill's 12:30 Report: Biden to announce increased measures for omicron MORE (R-Maine) argued that the checks and Section 230 were “two separate issues.”

Cornyn, who is close with McConnell, said repealing the liability shield used by tech companies wasn’t “germane” to the debate over increasing the amount of the stimulus checks.

“I think we need to address 230, but I just think this is not the right way to do it,” Cornyn said. “I am in favor of doing something, but not this week, not on this bill.”