SPONSORED:

Democrats shoot down McConnell's filibuster gambit

Democrats are shooting down an effort by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellGraham quips key to working with Trump: We both 'like him' The Hill's Morning Report - ObamaCare here to stay Democrats scramble to unify before election bill brawl MORE (R-Ky.) to include protections for the legislative filibuster as part of a Senate power-sharing deal.

"We’re not going to give him what he wishes. If you did that then there would be just unbridled use of it. I mean nothing holding him back," said Sen. Dick DurbinDick DurbinOvernight Health Care: Takeaways on the Supreme Court's Obamacare decision | COVID-19 cost 5.5 million years of American life | Biden administration investing billions in antiviral pills for COVID-19 COVID-19 long-haulers press Congress for paid family leave Joe Manchin keeps Democrats guessing on sweeping election bill MORE (Ill.), the No. 2 Senate Democrat, on Thursday.

McConnell has urged Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerFive takeaways on the Supreme Court's Obamacare decision Senate confirms Chris Inglis as first White House cyber czar Schumer vows to only pass infrastructure package that is 'a strong, bold climate bill' MORE (D-N.Y.) to include a preservation of the 60-vote legislative filibuster in any deal they strike on how to organize an evenly split 50-50 Senate, a request that is threatening to drag out their talks and keep much of the Senate in limbo for several more days. 

ADVERTISEMENT

McConnell, according to Durbin, wanted to include in the Senate's rules a guarantee that there would be no effort to pursue the "nuclear option" — changing the rules with a simple majority rather than the higher 60- or 67-vote threshold — during the next two years, or as long as the 50-50 split lasted. 

McConnell and Schumer are still negotiating over how to organize the Senate, keeping the chamber in an odd state where Democrats control the majority but, because the chamber hasn't passed a new organizing resolution, Republicans still control the majority of some committees.  

Schumer has been publicly tightlipped over their talks, as well as McConnell's specific demand, except to say that he believes they should agree to a resolution modeled off 2001, the last time there was a 50-50 Senate. 

"On an organizing resolution, Leader Schumer expressed that the fairest, most reasonable and easiest path forward is to adopt the 2001 bipartisan agreement without extraneous changes from either side," a spokesman said earlier this week after an initial meeting between the two leaders failed to produce an agreement. 

It's unclear if an alternative to protecting the filibuster in writing, like a handshake agreement between Schumer and McConnell or a floor speech by Schumer, could satisfy both sides and get the talks back on track. Democrats are poised to have their first caucus call since taking over the majority on Thursday. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Republicans argue that the organizing resolution is the best place to address the future of the filibuster because it prevents a decision from being made in the middle of a heated political debate.  

“I believe the time is ripe to address this issue head on before the passions of one particular issue or another arise," McConnell wrote in a letter to his caucus earlier this week.

McConnell defended his strategy on the Senate floor Thursday, noting that Biden and other Democrats have previously supported the filibuster.

"I cannot imagine the Democratic leader would rather hold up the power-sharing agreement than simply reaffirm that his side won't be breaking this standing rule of the Senate. I appreciate our ongoing good-faith discussions and look forward to finding the solution together," he said.

With a slim 50-50 majority that hinges on Vice President Harris breaking any ties, Democrats don't have the votes to nix the 60-vote legislative filibuster, even as the idea has gained steam in the caucus.

ADVERTISEMENT

Progressive activists are pledging to ramp up pressure to try to get rid of, or at least weaken, the legislative filibuster, arguing that it stands in the way of many of their, and President Biden's, top priorities such as immigration reform, voting rights and democracy reforms and limits their options on healthcare.  

"We should eliminate the filibuster," Sen. Ed MarkeyEd MarkeyDemocrats introduce resolution apologizing to LGBT community for government discrimination Hillicon Valley: Senate unanimously confirms Chris Inglis as first White House cyber czar | Scrutiny mounts on Microsoft's surveillance technology | Senators unveil bill to crack down on cyber criminals Biden signs Juneteenth bill: 'Great nations don't ignore their most painful moments' MORE (D-Mass.) tweeted on Thursday.

But several Democrats, most notably Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinHollywood goes all in for the For the People Act The Hill's Morning Report - ObamaCare here to stay Centrists gain leverage over progressives in Senate infrastructure battle MORE (D-W.Va.), are opposed to getting rid of it. Because Democrats only have 50 seats, they would need the support of every senator in order to change the rules on the filibuster via the "nuclear option."  

But Democrats also believe that leaving it on the table as a potential pathway could force Republicans to cut deals and don't want to box themselves in as they pledge to pursue a "bold" agenda. They would face a wave of acrimony from progressives if they agreed to a demand that many believe McConnell would never sign on to if the situation was reversed. 

"They should just have a simple organizing resolution like they have in the past. It’s not the time to make decisions like that, this is the time to simply figure out how are you going to share power when you have a 50-50 senate with Kamala HarrisKamala HarrisHarris signals a potential breakthrough in US-Mexico cooperation Watch live: Harris delivers remarks on vaccination efforts Biden signs Juneteenth bill: 'Great nations don't ignore their most painful moments' MORE as the deciding vote," said Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy KlobucharDemocrats scramble to unify before election bill brawl Hillicon Valley: Big Tech critic Lina Khan named chair of the FTC | Lawmakers urge Biden to be tough on cyber during summit with Putin | TSA working on additional security regulations following Colonial Pipeline hack Big Tech critic Lina Khan named chair of the FTC MORE (D-Minn.), the chairwoman of the Rules Committee.  

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyEnd the practice of hitting children in public schools Public option fades with little outcry from progressives Centrists gain leverage over progressives in Senate infrastructure battle MORE (D-Conn.) added that there wasn't "any reason to look beyond the precedent that existed the last time we shared power in the Senate. "  

"It’s generally up to the majority as to whether they want to pursue a conversation about changing the rules and we should reserve that right," Murphy said, adding that while there wasn't currently a consensus about what rules changes Democrats as a caucus could support, "that consensus may emerge down the line."

Updated at 1:20 p.m.