Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerBiden's Supreme Court commission ends not with a bang but a whimper Hispanic organizations call for Latino climate justice in reconciliation Senate to vote next week on Freedom to Vote Act MORE (D-N.Y.) is teeing up a Saturday vote to wind down debate on a roughly $1 trillion infrastructure bill, with senators hoping to pass the legislation as soon as this weekend.
Schumer on Thursday night moved to arrange the vote for Saturday, where he’ll need 60 votes to move forward, after a day of behind-the-scenes haggling failed to produce a breakthrough.
“I believe we’re very close to an agreement and see no reason why we can’t complete this important bipartisan bill," Schumer said. "So I urge both sides to continue working diligently to make it happen."
A Democratic aide described Schumer’s move as a back-up plan that would ensure that the Senate could take the procedural vote Saturday in the event that he wasn't able to work out a deal to finish the bill Thursday, as was the case.
After more than two hours on the floor, senators weren’t able to get a deal to wrap up the bill on Thursday night or agree on quickly moving to final passage once they reconvene on Saturday. That left some senators visibly frustrated as they departed the Capitol for the night.
Senators had hoped to get a deal on anywhere between 16 to 25 additional amendment votes, but that fell apart by the end of the night. Instead they’ll vote to start ending debate on Saturday and have up to 60 hours to burn before final passage.
“We very much want to finish this important bill so we will reconvene Saturday at noon to vote on cloture and then we will follow the regular order to finish the bill,” Schumer said.
Senators were seen huddling around Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) during Thursday night's hours-long vote as they tried to get him to cut a deal on a package of amendments.
"I was asked to consent to expedite the process and pass it. I could not, in good conscience, allow that to happen at this hour—especially when the objective of the majority is to hurry up and pass this bill so that they can move quickly to their $3.5 trillion tax-and-spend spree," Hagerty said in a statement, noting that the Senate just got a Congressional Budget Office Score on Thursday.
Schumer and Hagerty had been expected by several senators to try to offer competing schedules on potential amendment votes and block each other's requests; instead, the Senate ended its session with Sen. Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaManchin lays down demands for child tax credit: report Buttigieg says delay in climate action will cost lives amid reports of Manchin roadblock Virginia race looms as dark cloud over Biden's agenda MORE (D-Ariz.) thanking senators for "the work we've done together in a bipartisan fashion."
Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneGOP rallies around Manchin, Sinema McConnell gets GOP wake-up call Democrat on controversial Schumer speech: Timing 'may not have been the best' MORE (R-S.D.), the No.2 Senate Republican, said the anticlimactic end said "cooler heads prevailed."
The inability to get a deal came after leadership called an unrelated vote on a judicial nominee Thursday night to try to get senators back on the floor to see if they could work out a deal that would let them finish the infrastructure bill late Thursday night, or as part of an all-night session that would wrap Friday morning.
Senators, however, had low expectations, predicting that the bill would instead finish over the weekend.
Asked about the possibility of passing the bill on Thursday night, Thune said earlier Thursday evening that he was “not feeling” it.
“If you wanna see final passage, go home,” Thune added.
Sen. Josh HawleyJoshua (Josh) David HawleyPentagon, State Department square off on Afghanistan accountability Biden's push for unity collides with entrenched partisanship The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - Senate nears surprise deal on short-term debt ceiling hike MORE (R-Mo.) laughed when asked about the chance of a Thursday night deal.
“A bunch of people have holds,” he said.
Other senators were spotted leaving the Capitol, indicating that they were going home for the night.
Senators pointed to a few last sticking points that were slowing down a final deal, including a push by Sen. Shelby (R-Ala.) and other Republicans to add roughly $50 billion in defense infrastructure into the bill.
Sens. Rob PortmanRobert (Rob) Jones PortmanMcConnell gets GOP wake-up call Biden shows little progress with Abraham Accords on first anniversary The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - After high drama, Senate lifts debt limit MORE (R-Ohio) and Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerThe root of Joe Biden's troubles Pressure grows for breakthrough in Biden agenda talks Fill the Eastern District of Virginia MORE (D-Va.) were also battling with Sens. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeyBlack women look to build upon gains in coming elections Watch live: GOP senators present new infrastructure proposal Sasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment vote MORE (R-Pa.), Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenCongress needs to step up on crypto, or Biden might crush it Democrats face growing storm over IRS reporting provision Best shot at narrowing racial homeownership gap at risk, progressives say MORE (D-Ore.) and Cynthia LummisCynthia Marie LummisCongress needs to step up on crypto, or Biden might crush it Senators preview bill to stop tech giants from prioritizing their own products GOP ramps up attacks on IRS proposal for spending package MORE (R-Wyo.) over cryptocurrency policy, with competing amendments over who would be exempt from the bill’s tax provisions.
“I think we’re at an impasse,” Toomey told reporters.
The White House on Thursday night came out in favor of the Portman-Warner amendment, wading into the Senate battle.
“We are grateful to Chairman Wyden for his leadership in pushing the Senate to address this issue, however we believe that the alternative amendment put forward by Senators Warner, Portman, and Sinema strikes the right balance and makes an important step forward in promoting tax compliance,” said Andrew Bates, a spokesman for the White House.
Wyden fired back, saying in a statement that the Warner-Portman proposal “provides a government-sanctioned safe harbor for the most climate-damaging form of crypto tech, called proof-of-work.”
Updated: Aug. 6, 12:40 a.m.