GOP senator vows to slow-walk $1T infrastructure bill, sparking standoff

A standoff over the roughly $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill is poised to drag out the Senate’s debate for days, with GOP Sen. Bill Hagerty (Tenn.) vowing he will block attempts to speed up passage of the legislation.

The Senate voted earlier Saturday to get the bill over a key procedural hurdle. But senators are increasingly pessimistic about the chances of a quick agreement and wrapped up for the night without a breakthrough. 

Without a deal, the next vote on the bill will be on Sunday evening and it would not pass the Senate until early Tuesday morning.


"I’m not inclined to expedite this process whatsoever," Hagerty told reporters after he spoke on the Senate floor Saturday in opposition to the bill.

It isn't the first time Hagerty has thrown a wrench into the Senate's infrastructure debate.

Senators had hoped to wrap up the bill late Thursday night or early Friday morning, and senators were seen lobbying Hagerty on the Senate floor. But the chamber ultimately adjourned early Friday without passing the bill.

The standoff didn't appear to have thawed by Saturday, when 18 GOP senators joined all Democrats to advance the legislation.

"I just don't think there's enough pressure yet. ... It takes a little while for people to stare at each other and feel a little about the pressure to come to an agreement on amendments," said GOP Sen. John ThuneJohn Randolph ThuneDemocratic frustration with Sinema rises Senate Republicans raise concerns about TSA cyber directives for rail, aviation Democrats narrow scope of IRS proposal amid GOP attacks MORE (S.D.).

Senators had hoped to vote this week on anywhere between 16 and 25 amendments making potential changes to the bill. Now, in order to get votes on those amendments, they'll need to cut a deal that can win approval from every senator.


However, Thune said that in order for Democrats to allow votes on amendments, Republicans would have to agree to speed up the bill — something Hagerty is saying he won't do. 

"The currency we have is time, and it's going to be up to our members, obviously, whether they're willing to do that, and then there has to also be an agreement on the universe [of] amendments that could be voted on," Thune said about the dynamics of the trade-off.

Hagerty bristled over the idea of agreeing to speed up the bill in order to get amendment votes, arguing that they weren't linked. 

"What they're asking for is an expedited process that has nothing to do with the amendments. I'm not against any of the amendments, not opposed to any of them. I'm not the one holding any of the amendments up. They're free to start under normal order," Hagerty said.

Several of the amendments have sparked controversy, including a battle over cryptocurrency tax policy that has pitted Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron WydenRonald (Ron) Lee WydenClimate advocates turn sights on Wall Street Democrats scramble to reach deal on taxes Pelosi open to scrapping key components in spending package MORE (D-Ore.) against the White House and a GOP push led by Sen. Richard ShelbyRichard Craig ShelbyBlack Hawk pilot shot down in Somalia jumps into Alabama Senate race Senate Democrats ditch Hyde amendment for first time in decades Senate Democrats unveil remaining spending bills, teeing up clash with Republicans MORE (Ala.) to add $50 billion for defense infrastructure into the bill. 

A GOP aide also accused the White House of trying to work behind the scenes to kill an amendment from Sens. John CornynJohn CornynCornyn raises more than M for Senate GOP Is the Biden administration afraid of trade? The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - After high drama, Senate lifts debt limit MORE (R-Texas) and Alex PadillaAlex PadillaSenate Democrats call for diversity among new Federal Reserve Bank presidents GOP blocks Senate Democrats' revised elections bill Progressives push back on decision to shrink Biden's paid family leave program MORE (D-Calif.) that would let states use some of their COVID-19 relief funds on infrastructure projects.

"I thought we had an agreement unless they're playing dirty pool," Cornyn said. "I'll assume good faith until it's shown otherwise." 

And Thune noted that there are other GOP senators besides Hagerty with objections to speeding things up. 

Senators are now warning that they expect to be in for a days-long process. 

Sen. Brian SchatzBrian Emanuel SchatzClimate advocates turn sights on Wall Street To sustain humanity COP26 must lead on both climate and biodiversity Democrats struggle to sell Biden plan amid feuding MORE (D-Hawaii) told reporters that it's going to "30 plus 30," a reference to the 60 hours that opponents can force the Senate to burn through before a final vote. 

"It's going to be the regular order," he said. 

Cornyn said it "depends on how soon people sort of see the handwriting on the wall."


Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerDemocratic frustration with Sinema rises Schumer endorses democratic socialist India Walton in Buffalo mayor's race Guns Down America's leader says Biden 'has simply not done enough' on gun control MORE (D-N.Y.) warned earlier Saturday that they wanted to hold additional amendment votes but said he would keep moving the bipartisan deal toward final passage with or without a deal. 

"We can get this done the easy way or the hard way. In either case, the Senate will stay in session until we finish our work. It's up to my Republican colleagues how long it takes," he said. 

Conservatives have fumed over the $1 trillion bipartisan deal, arguing that it just makes it easier for Democrats to pass a budget resolution that will greenlight a separate $3.5 trillion spending package that they will craft later this year. 

"Most of us in this body have not had the opportunity to be at the table, and amendments that we have worked on that we felt like would have improved this bill are not going to be hard. Not here, not in committee," said Sen. Marsha BlackburnMarsha BlackburnSenator asks Facebook's Zuckerberg to testify at hearing on kids' safety TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat executives to testify at Senate hearing on kids' safety Buttigieg hits back after parental leave criticism: 'Really strange' MORE (R-Tenn.). 

"I'm for infrastructure projects, yes, indeed. Am I for this piece of legislation? No, because it's a document that has misplaced priorities," Blackburn added.

The conservative pushback comes as former President TrumpDonald TrumpHillicon Valley — Presented by Xerox — Twitter's algorithm boosts right-leaning content, internal study finds Ohio Democrat calls Vance an 'ass----' over Baldwin tweet Matt Taibbi says Trump's rhetoric caused public perception of US intelligence services to shift MORE has slammed the bill while criticizing Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellBiden says he's open to altering, eliminating filibuster to advance voting rights Pelosi says GOP senators 'voted to aid and abet' voter suppression for blocking revised elections bill Manchin insists he hasn't threatened to leave Democrats MORE (R-Ky.), who has helped advance the bill so far. 


"Joe BidenJoe BidenHow 'Buy American', other pro-US policies can help advocates pass ambitious climate policies Overnight Defense & National Security — Presented by Raytheon Technologies — Biden backtracks on Taiwan Photos of the Week: Manchin protestor, Paris Hilton and a mirror room MORE’s infrastructure bill is a disgrace. If Mitch McConnell was smart, which we’ve seen no evidence of, he would use the debt ceiling card to negotiate a good infrastructure package," Trump said in a statement Saturday. 

He added that the bill would be used against Republicans in 2022 and 2024 and said it would be "very hard" for him to back "anyone foolish enough to vote in favor of this deal."

Updated: 8:30 p.m.