Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellHow Cruz Supreme Court case could lead to unlimited anonymous election spending Trump and Biden should stop denigrating US elections The Armageddon elections to come MORE (R-Ky.) on Monday night blocked an attempt by Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerVoting rights failed in the Senate — where do we go from here? Forced deadline spurs drastic tactic in Congress Democrats call on Biden administration to ease entry to US for at-risk Afghans MORE (D-N.Y.) to set up simple majority votes on a sweeping elections bill and legislation to bolster the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which would have allowed Democrats to pass the two bills without GOP support.
Schumer, on the Senate floor, detailed his offer: allowing the two bills to need only a simple majority to pass instead of needing the normal 60 votes to advance in the Senate. In exchange, Democrats would sign off on holding simple majority votes on nearly 20 bills that Republicans placed on the Senate calendar, which makes them available for a vote but doesn't guarantee they'll get one.
"We Democrats aren't afraid of these votes. So what I proposed to the Republican leader is that the Senate hold up-or-down votes at a majority threshold on each of the Republicans bills he has outlined tonight as well as the Freedom to Vote Act and the John LewisJohn LewisTrump and Biden should stop denigrating US elections Democrats say change to filibuster just a matter of time Despite Senate setbacks, the fight for voting rights is far from over MORE Voting Rights Advancement Act," Schumer said from the Senate floor.
McConnell, however, rejected Schumer's offer without elaborating on his objection. Under the Senate's rules, any one senator can try to set up a vote or pass a bill, but because it requires signoff from the full Senate, any one senator can also object and block the request.
Schumer is expected to force votes this week on both the Freedom to Vote Act, which would overhaul federal elections, and separate voting legislation named after the late Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) that would strengthen the 1965 Voting Rights Act. But Republicans are set to use the 60-vote legislative filibuster to block those bills from advancing.
Once that happens, Schumer has vowed to bring up changing the legislative filibuster by Jan. 17, bringing to a head months of behind-the-scenes negotiations among Democrats as they've tried to unify on rules changes.
To change the rules, Democrats need total unity from all 50 of their members, something they don't yet have. Sens. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinBiden to meet with CEOs to discuss Build Back Better agenda Hoyer says 'significant' version of Build Back Better will pass this year Gallego went to New York to meet Sinema donors amid talk of primary challenge: report MORE (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten SinemaKyrsten SinemaGallego went to New York to meet Sinema donors amid talk of primary challenge: report The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden's public moment of frustration The Armageddon elections to come MORE (D-Ariz.) both support a supermajority requirement for legislation, while others, including Sen. Mark KellyMark KellyThe Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by Facebook - Biden's public moment of frustration Democrats say change to filibuster just a matter of time Democrats torn over pushing stolen-election narrative MORE (D-Ariz.), haven't yet taken a position. Democrats also haven't landed on what proposal would unite the other 48 members of the caucus besides Manchin and Sinema, with some senators supportive of a talking filibuster, while others back a carveout for voting rights.
But even as the Democratic bid to change the rules appears to be a long shot, Republicans are ramping up their pushback against the effort. McConnell and Schumer traded shots on the Senate floor earlier Monday.
And Republicans put their 18 bills on the Senate calendar to showcase the kind of legislation they would try to force to the floor if Democrats got rid of the 60-vote hurdle currently required to start debate on a bill. Even if a bill meets that threshold, opponents can still try to block it with the same requirement needed to end debate and move to a final vote.
“Since Sen. Schumer is hellbent on trying to break the Senate, Republicans will show how this reckless action would have immediate consequences,” McConnell said in a statement first reported by The Wall Street Journal.
The bills that Republicans are making available for a vote include legislation on immigration, fracking, Cuba, President BidenJoe BidenDeputy AG: DOJ investigating fake Trump electors On The Money — Vaccine-or-test mandate for businesses nixed Warner tests positive for breakthrough COVID-19 case MORE's vaccine mandate and limiting funding to school districts that don't have in-person learning amid the coronavirus pandemic. But Schumer's office argued that by forcing Republicans to block votes on their own bills, in exchange for allowing simple majority votes on the Democratic election bills, they were calling McConnell's "bluff."