Preet BhararaPreet BhararaWhatever else he did, Cuomo did not obstruct justice by ranting to Obama White House Why Trump (probably) won't be indicted New York Times in discussions to acquire The Athletic: report MORE, the former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said Sunday that it would almost be a “self-executing impeachment” if President TrumpDonald TrumpRobert Gates says 'extreme polarization' is the greatest threat to US democracy Cassidy says he won't vote for Trump if he runs in 2024 Schiff says holding Bannon in criminal contempt 'a way of getting people's attention' MORE were to pardon himself.
“I think it would be outrageous for a sitting president of the United States [to self-pardon],” Bharara told CNN’s “State of the Union.”
“I think if the president decided he was going to pardon himself, I think it is almost self-executing impeachment. Whether or not there is an argument that is not what the Framers could have intended.”
Trump fired Bharara last year after he refused to resign from his post.
Former US Attorney Preet Bharara on the dictated Donald Trump Jr.Don TrumpHow Trump uses fundraising emails to remain undisputed leader of the GOP Donald Trump Jr. joins Cameo Book claims Trump family members were 'inappropriately' close with Secret Service agents MORE statement: “I think the important thing … is that you have the lawyer to the President of the United States ... basically lie to the American people” #CNNSOTU https://t.co/d1zVfx05aE— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) June 3, 2018
Bharara's comments came in response to an earlier statement made by Trump's lawyer Rudy Giuliani, in which the attorney said the president has the power to pardon himself.
Giuliani, appearing on ABC's "This Week" Sunday morning, said Trump could pardon himself, though has no plans to do so.
"He’s not, but he probably does," Giuliani, said on ABC.
"He has no intention of pardoning himself," Giuliani added. "That’s another really interesting constitutional question: Can the president pardon himself?"
"It would be an open question. I think it would probably get answered by, 'gosh that’s what the Constitution says.’ And if you want to change it, change it. But, yeah.”
Bharara’s and Giuliani's comments come after The New York Times published a confidential 20-page letter from Trump’s lawyers to special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) MuellerSenate Democrats urge Garland not to fight court order to release Trump obstruction memo Why a special counsel is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as AG Barr taps attorney investigating Russia probe origins as special counsel MORE, who is leading an investigation into possible ties between the Trump campaign and Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
In the letter, attorneys argued that the president couldn’t have obstructed justice because he has authority over all federal investigations. Lawyers also wrote that the Constitution gives Trump the broad authority to, "if he wished, terminate the inquiry, or even exercise his power to pardon."