Transportation Secretary Pete ButtigiegPete ButtigiegThe Memo: 2024 chatter reveals Democratic nervousness Biden to tout new bridge program at infrastructure law's 60-day mark Stacey Abrams's shocking snub of Biden, Harris signals possible 2024 aspirations MORE said on Sunday that he "should have been more precise" when confronted over number of jobs that he said would be created by President BidenJoe BidenCarville advises Democrats to 'quit being a whiny party' Wendy Sherman takes leading role as Biden's 'hard-nosed' Russia negotiator Sullivan: 'It's too soon to tell' if Texas synagogue hostage situation part of broader extremist threat MORE's infrastructure proposal.
"Fox News Sunday" host Chris WallaceChristopher (Chris) WallaceAudie Cornish hired by CNN, will host show and podcast on streaming service The five biggest media stories of 2021 News networks see major viewership drop in 2021 MORE brought up a remark Buttigieg made a week ago during an interview on NBC's "Meet the Press," during which Buttigieg falsely claimed that the package was estimated to create 19 million jobs.
"It turns out the study you're citing from Moody's Analytics says the economy will add 16.3 million jobs without the infrastructure bill, and 2.7 million more with it. So it doesn't, as you said last Sunday, create 19 million jobs," Wallace said, adding: "Again, Secretary Buttigieg, why mislead folks?"
"Well, you're right, I should have been more precise," Buttigieg responded.
He went on to say: "[T]he bottom line is, it's going to add jobs. And this is a direct refutation of people who are saying otherwise. So, yes, you're right, I should be very precise. The difference in jobs that that particular analysis suggests is 2.7 million more. That is a great place to be. Why wouldn't we want America to create 2.7 million more jobs?"
Buttigieg also stressed that while the $2 trillion proposal unveiled by President Biden at a speech in Pittsburgh had broad bipartisan support nationwide, even if it had yet to pick up any Republican backing in Congress.
Republicans have criticized the president's proposal for containing what is not traditionally considered infrastructure, including parts of the legislation addressing climate change. Several GOP senators have suggested that a bipartisan compromise could be reached around a much smaller bill, though the White House has yet to say how low Democrats would be willing to go.
The plan also faces some resistance from Republicans and Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinDemocrats make voting rights push ahead of Senate consideration Sunday shows - Voting rights legislation dominates Kaine says core of spending bill will pass but most of it is 'dead' MORE (D-W.V.), a crucial swing vote, over its proposal to fund the infrastructure measure via raising the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent.