Immigration fight gets lonely for some in GOP

Immigration fight gets lonely for some in GOP
© Greg Nash

House Republicans who favor a bipartisan replacement for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program are increasingly at odds with their leadership, as the party digs in for a difficult midterm election. 

Rep. Jeff DenhamJeffrey (Jeff) John DenhamCrazy California an outlier? No, we are the canary in the coal mine Polling editor says news outlets should be more cautious calling elections Rep. Valadao officially concedes in California race MORE (R-Calif.) has rounded up 45 votes — and is expecting more in the coming week — on a resolution that would put four separate immigration bills up for a House vote in a process known as "Queen of the Hill."

Under Queen of the Hill, several proposals on the same issue are voted on, and the bill with the most votes is adopted, so long as it wins a majority of the House.

Denham's resolution would allow the House to pick between a conservative, Republican-only immigration bill proposed by Rep. Bob GoodlatteRobert (Bob) William GoodlatteHouse GOP probe into FBI, DOJ comes to an end Murkowski to reintroduce bill to help abused Native American women FBI hits GOP chairman over push to clear sensitive transcripts by Christmas Eve MORE (R-Va.); the DREAM Act, a nominally bipartisan albeit liberal proposal that would protect millions of so-called Dreamers from deportation; the USA Act, a bipartisan proposal that would exchange Dreamer protections for border security provisions; and a bill of Speaker Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanHouse vote fails to quell storm surrounding Steve King House passes resolution condemning white nationalism Anti-Defamation League calls on House leaders to censure Steve King over white supremacy comments MORE's (R-Wis.) choosing.

The opening to Ryan was explicitly meant to smooth the path for the Speaker take action, Denham told The Hill. 

ADVERTISEMENT

"We wanted to make sure that we left it so we were not tying the Speaker's hands, but we were making sure that we were addressing a full vote in front of the House," he said Wednesday. 

But Ryan said Thursday that Denham's plan "is not the right way to go." 

"I don't want to bring legislation that won't get signed into law. I don't think it makes any sense to bring a bill through or a process through that would produce a bill that will get a presidential veto," Ryan told reporters.

That's irked vulnerable members in districts with large Hispanic populations, but also in swing districts, as a DACA solution has polled favorably both among Latinos and moderate voters.

"I don't know how Denham's plan could get vetoed by the president. It's a rule. What if the product of that process is something the president supports? That's incoherent," said Rep. Carlos CurbeloCarlos Luis CurbeloEx-GOP Rep. Ryan Costello joins group pushing carbon tax Hispanic Caucus boasts record membership in new Congress Chuck Todd says his show is 'not going to give time to climate deniers' MORE (R-Fla.) a top target for Democrats.

Curbelo added Ryan could use his slot in Denham's proposal to propose a bill that would satisfy President TrumpDonald John TrumpPentagon update to missile defense doctrine will explore space-base technologies, lasers to counter threats Giuliani: 'I never said there was no collusion' between the Trump campaign and Russia Former congressmen, RNC members appointed to Trump administration roles MORE's requirements on immigration and have a shot at winning Queen of the Hill. 

"What we have called on him to do is to bring a proposal that's similar to what the White House has proposed to the floor. And obviously the president would sign that," he said.

But Trump has rejected multiple immigration proposals, insisting that any DACA bill also cut legal immigration, a non-starter for Democrats and some Republicans.

And it's unlikely any immigration bill that could clear the House without Democratic votes would then be able to pass the Senate.

That's left Ryan, who's retiring at the end of this term, little choice but to throw his weight behind the party's right wing on immigration.

"This is a midterm election. Obviously the Republicans are in trouble in mostly suburban districts where the Democrats are trying to use immigration as an issue," said Ford O'Connell, a Republican political analyst. 

"On the campaign trail, they’re going to err more toward the President Trump side," he added. 

That leaves immigration moderates in swing districts, like Denham and Curbelo, isolated from their party. 

Still, that doesn't mean Ryan and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthyKevin Owen McCarthyOn The Money: Shutdown Day 26 | Pelosi calls on Trump to delay State of the Union | Cites 'security concerns' | DHS chief says they can handle security | Waters lays out agenda | Senate rejects effort to block Trump on Russia sanctions Dem leaders avert censure vote against Steve King McCarthy rejects idea of censuring Steve King MORE (R-Calif.) — whom Ryan endorsed as his successor Friday — are abandoning those districts. 

"I don’t think they’re leaving them for dead. What they’re telling them is you can do anything you need to do to win," O'Connell said.

"The best you can hope for is to equip them with as much money as they need to fight this race on their own terms," he added. 

Many of those races are expected to be very expensive.

Curbelo's 2016 race cost nearly $20 million, putting it in the top 10 most expensive House races in the country, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

This year, Curbelo is again a top target for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), which has recruited a strong opponent in Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a consultant who's drawn in national-grade endorsements including former Vice President Joe BidenJoseph (Joe) Robinette BidenHow Pelosi is punishing some critics while rewarding others Julián Castro calls for ‘tuition-free’ public colleges, apprenticeships Sanders to meet with staffers as he does damage control MORE.

In districts like Curbelo's, where Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonTexas man indicted over allegations he created fraudulent campaign PACs FISA shocker: DOJ official warned Steele dossier was connected to Clinton, might be biased Pompeo’s Cairo speech more ‘back to the future’ than break with past MORE beat Trump by 16 points, Republican incumbents are expected to play defense, but the DCCC is using Trump's unpopularity to expand the field beyond its traditional targets.

"They’re trying to spread it out to force the Republicans not to keep their eye on the ball," said O'Connell. 

Still, both Republicans and Democrats in heavily Hispanic districts need to keep immigration in the headlines, despite overwhelming odds against serious congressional consideration, let alone passage, of any bill on the issue.

Denham is working with Rep. Pete AguilarPeter (Pete) Ray AguilarDem added to Ways and Means Committee amid desire for more Hispanic members Dreamers-for-wall trade going nowhere in House DeGette dropped from chief deputy whip spot MORE (D-Calif.) to show bipartisan support for his Queen of The Hill proposal.

"What I've found is they're a committed group of Republicans who really want to solve this issue in a fair way with a path to citizenship, and I'll work with anyone that meets that goal, and thankfully there are quite a few," said Aguilar, the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Whip. 

With Denham's 45-and-counting set of co-sponsors and likely unanimous support from Democrats, the proposal easily surpasses the 218-vote threshold to pass the House, but it still depends on leadership to bring it to the floor, an unlikely proposition.

But if those co-sponsors also support what's known as a discharge petition, the committee process and leadership could be bypassed, bringing legislation straight to the floor. 

Floor discharge petitions are rarely successful, and they're seen as a slap in the face to leadership.

Some supporters of the Denham proposal have hinted that, given further inaction on immigration, they'll support discharge. 

Others have been more explicit. 

Asked what would happen if leadership buried the Denham rule, Curbelo said, "it may mean that we have to force the issue." 

"I'm ready," he added.