Nielsen testifies: Five things you need to know

Nielsen testifies: Five things you need to know
© Stefani Reynolds

Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen NielsenKirstjen Michele NielsenDOJ to Supreme Court: Trump decision to end DACA was lawful Top immigration aide experienced 'jolt of electricity to my soul' when Trump announced campaign Trump casts uncertainty over top intelligence role MORE endured a grilling Wednesday during a contentious hearing on border security with the House Homeland Security Committee.

Nielsen defended President TrumpDonald John TrumpDavid Axelrod after Ginsburg cancer treatment: Supreme Court vacancy could 'tear this country apart' EU says it will 'respond in kind' if US slaps tariffs on France Ginsburg again leaves Supreme Court with an uncertain future MORE’s decision to declare a national emergency at the southern border and faced rigorous questioning over the administration’s handling of asylum claims and family separations.

The public hearing was Nielsen’s first in front of the new Democratic majority, her first since Trump’s emergency declaration, and came one day after the government released data that showed a spike in apprehensions and denials of people attempting to enter the United States in February.

Here are five key moments.

Nielsen: Border is an emergency

ADVERTISEMENT

Nielsen repeatedly told lawmakers that the president was justified in declaring a national emergency, warning that an influx of migrants could “overwhelm” the immigration system.

“This is a legitimate national emergency,” Nielsen told Rep. Mark WalkerBradley (Mark) Mark WalkerOn The Money: House passes sweeping budget, debt limit deal | Dem court filing defends powers to get Trump's NY tax returns | Debt collectors to pay M to settle consumer bureau charges House passes sweeping budget, debt limit deal Romney to vote against budget deal: Agreement 'perpetuates fiscal recklessness' MORE (R-N.C.). “This is a twin crisis, and we can do better as a country. We have to have a system where we can protect vulnerable populations. We can secure our border, which is our sovereign responsibility. We can protect communities while facilitating legal trade and travel.”

She said the increase in migrants has led to a surge in human and drug trafficking and violence, creating a humanitarian and national security crisis.

Democrats pressed Nielsen on whether the situation genuinely constituted an emergency, saying government statistics and the president’s own words suggest otherwise.

Committee Chairman Bennie ThompsonBennie Gordon ThompsonPelosi asks Democrats for 'leverage' on impeachment DHS cyber agency to prioritize election security, Chinese threats Trump officials unveil rule allowing indefinite migrant family detentions MORE (D-Miss.) noted that Trump himself said he “didn’t need to” issue the executive order.

Nielsen suggested Trump meant he wouldn’t have had to declare an emergency to construct a border wall if Congress had met his funding requests.

More than 70,000 people were apprehended or turned away at the border in February, a recent record but still well below the high mark in the early 2000s.

Dems hammer over family separations

Democrats ripped Nielsen over the administration’s policy of separating parents from their children, with some seeking to pin her down over the government’s use of cages to hold detained migrant children.

Rep. Bonnie Watson ColemanBonnie Watson ColemanPelosi asks Democrats for 'leverage' on impeachment Here are the 95 Democrats who voted to support impeachment Racial politics roil Democratic Party MORE (D-N.J.) asked Nielsen how the chain-link enclosures used to contain young migrants differed from “the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside.”

“It’s larger,” Nielsen responded. “It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.”

Separately, Nielsen told Thompson that the government doesn’t “use cages for children,” arguing the enclosures were being unfairly described as such.

“We’re not going to go through the semantics,” Thompson said. “Now, I saw the ... fences that were made as cages. And you did, too. If it’s a bad policy then change it, but don’t mislead the committee.”

Rep. Kathleen RiceKathleen Maura RicePelosi backers feel vindicated after tumultuous stretch Democrat offers measure to prevent lawmakers from sleeping in their offices Hillicon Valley: Pelosi blasts Facebook for not taking down doctored video | Democrats push election security after Mueller warning | Critics dismiss FCC report on broadband access | Uber to ban passengers with low ratings MORE (D-N.Y.) pushed Nielsen on her role in family separations, asking whether she had agreed to use separations as a deterrent, rather than just a consequence of the Justice Department "zero tolerance" policy.

Nielsen refused to answer directly but said she “concurred with their assessment on what to do to increase consequences for those crossing the border illegally.”

Under the zero tolerance policy, all adults who crossed the border for the first time were referred to the Justice Department for prosecution, mandating the separation of parents and children traveling together.

GOP presses need for increased border security

Nielsen’s appearance took place in the shadow of a debate over Trump’s emergency declaration, which the Senate appears ready to block.

That will set up a veto by Trump, and it does not appear the votes are there to override the president in the House.

Republicans at the hearing underscored the need for Trump’s action give the state of the border, with one lawmaker making a comparison to D-Day.

“73,000 American troops landed in the D-Day invasion,” said Rep. Clay HigginsGlen (Clay) Clay Higgins58 GOP lawmakers vote against disaster aid bill GOP lawmaker vows to catch those responsible for string of arsons at black churches in Louisiana GOP lawmaker says border situation threatens US 'integrity' MORE (R-La.). “We have 76,103, according to my numbers, apprehensions along our southern border last month. We have D-Day every month on our southern border.”

Higgins and other Republicans repeatedly said the border could not be protected with technology and personnel alone and that barriers were needed.

“Can you just take one of those away?” Rep. Dan CrenshawDaniel CrenshawRed flag laws won't stop mass shootings — ending gun-free zones will CNN slams GOP for not appearing on network after mass shootings, conservatives fire back Texas Democratic official: GOP needs to 'get real' about gun reform after El Paso MORE (R-Texas) asked at one point.

“No, sir,” Nielsen replied.

She later said the agency was on pace to apprehend more than 900,000 undocumented immigrants this year.

Dem blasts Nielsen over asylum laws

The most contentious exchange came when Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán (D-Calif.) asked Nielsen whether asylum-seekers were ever turned away from ports of entry by Customs and Border Protection agents, which would be illegal under asylum laws.

“They are not turned away,” Nielsen said.

“Let me tell you, madam secretary, either you are lying to this committee or you don't know what's happening at the border,” Barragán replied, brushing aside Nielsen's attempts to respond.

“You said that you waited to give direction on the family separation policy because you wanted to do it with compassion. Do you know how outrageous that sounds?" asked Barragán, without waiting for a response from Nielsen.

Immigration activists flock to Congress 

A large number of immigration activists were at the Capitol Wednesday protesting everything from family separations to a failure to legislate a path to citizenship for "Dreamers" — people who were brought to the United States illegally or stayed illegally as children.

A coalition of groups supporting Dreamers — undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children — and Temporary Protected Status (TPS) beneficiaries met with Congressional Hispanic Caucus members before the hearing.

Under TPS, nationals of foreign countries undergoing man-made or natural disasters are allowed to live and work in the United States. The Trump administration has worked to eliminate as many countries from TPS as possible, but its efforts have been slowed down in the courts.

Assistant Speaker Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) complimented the administration for following a court order to maintain TPS benefits until the courts emit their final sentences.

“It shows that we can get work done together,” he said.

Most Democrats were not as complimentary.

“Unfortunately, Secretary Nielsen has not acted in the best faith in the past when she's testified in front of Congress or even in her meetings with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus,” said Rep. Joaquin CastroJoaquin CastroThe exhaustion of Democrats' anti-Trump delusions Juan Williams: Democrats finally hit Trump where it hurts Texas Democrats tap Joaquin Castro to deliver key address MORE (D-Texas), the group’s chairman.