Immigration experts on Thursday said that a chart used by two Republican senators during a hearing on migrant interactions misrepresented the number of immigrants detained at the border between the spring of 2020 and early 2021.
The experts said that the data showed on the lawmakers' charts exaggerated the magnitude of the surge in apprehensions after President BidenJoe BidenBiden: Democrats' spending plan is 'a bigger darn deal' than Obamacare Biden says he's open to altering, eliminating filibuster to advance voting rights Biden: Comment that DOJ should prosecute those who defy subpoenas 'not appropriate' MORE's inauguration.
The chart used by Sen. Ron JohnsonRonald (Ron) Harold JohnsonA pandemic of hyper-hypocrisy is infecting American politics Sen. Ron Johnson hoping for Democratic 'gridlock' on reconciliation package Republicans' mantra should have been 'Stop the Spread' MORE (R-Wis.) and later grabbed by Sen. Mitt RomneyWillard (Mitt) Mitt RomneyTrump-backed bills on election audits, illegal voting penalties expected to die in Texas legislature The Memo: Conservatives change their tune on big government Defense & National Security — Military starts giving guidance on COVID-19 vaccine refusals MORE (R-Utah) was used in questioning of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro MayorkasAlejandro MayorkasFederal officers detail abuse described by asylum seekers Senate Republicans raise concerns about TSA cyber directives for rail, aviation Ending worksite raids is a show; focus should be on employer compliance MORE.
The graphic showed apprehensions of immigrants plummeting shortly after the Trump administration ordered quick expulsions of migrants due to the pandemic, a process known as Title 42.
And while border encounters and apprehensions did plummet at that point, DHS stopped counting Title 42 arrests and expulsions as "apprehensions," skewing the numbers in comparison to those prior to March 2020.
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy counsel at the American Immigration Council, first noted the discrepancy on Twitter.
"How deceptive was the chart that @RonJohnsonWI and @SenatorRomney displayed at today's hearing on migrant children?" wrote Reichlin-Melnick. "I mapped out the missing data to show you what the chart 'mysteriously' left out—a trend of rising border encounters that began months before Biden took office."
How deceptive was the chart that @RonJohnsonWI and @SenatorRomney displayed at today's hearing on migrant children?— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) May 13, 2021
I mapped out the missing data to show you what the chart "mysteriously" left out—a trend of rising border encounters that began months before Biden took office. pic.twitter.com/3ZXlPPWg5q
Reichlin-Melnick's annotated chart shows discrepancies ranging between 3,991 uncounted apprehensions in March 2020, to 17,713 in January 2021, a steady incline toward the border apprehension levels seen under the Biden administration.
Without the Border Patrol encounters charted by Reichlin-Melnick, Johnson's chart shows a much steeper surge.
“I often say the first step in solving any problem is admitting you have one. And it just seemed like we're an utter state of denial,” Johnson said, pointing to the chart, adding that “it's galling quite honestly to hear that this is a crisis inherited by this administration.”
“Let's go back to my chart here, what the Trump administration did is they ended the incentives,” he said, referencing Trump’s remain in Mexico policy, which barred immigrants from entering the U.S. to apply for asylum and Title 42.
“That's that line right there. You can see, it worked," he said. "Add to that the imposition of Title 42 and it really worked. We pretty well stopped a robust surge of illegal immigration at the border.”
Johnson’s chart also pinpointed Biden’s inauguration, at which point the other types of apprehensions at the border leaves are left out, and the data appears to soar.
“There's the surge, and it is undeniable and yet you are denying it,” Johnson said.
With the March-January Title 42 encounters charted in, the surge takes on a smoother shape that still trends upward.
Mayorkas earlier in the hearing criticized the Trump administration for undercutting programs that could have helped the U.S. prepare for migration that often ticks up in the spring.
But he also criticized the Trump policies that Johnson said were an effective deterrent.
“One of the things the Trump administration did was separate children from their parents, and they ripped sons and daughters out of the hands of fathers and mothers and said they would never see each other again. That's one of the things and maybe that worked. Maybe it didn't. But I'll tell you what it didn't work for is the values and principles of this country,” Mayorkas said.
Romney also relied on Johnson’s chart during the hearing.
“I look at this chart that was prepared by Sen. Johnson, and I see an extraordinary crisis,” he said.
Neither Johnson nor Romney returned requests for comment on the corrected numbers.
Although the chart presented at the hearing was misleading, it did reflect information passed on by DHS to congressional offices.
Reichlin-Melnick produced an example of the information sent to Capitol Hill by Trump administration officials in December, which did not include the Title 42 encounters.
"So what do you get? A massive screwup with a chart which is insanely deceptive being splashed across C-Span and social media, based on a staffer's incomplete understanding of border metrics that was used by senators who didn't have the background of knowledge to spot the error," wrote Reichlin-Melnick.
Here's an example of this data that CBP sent to Congress in December. Notice how the weekly totals for Border Patrol Apprehensions are really, really low?— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) May 13, 2021
That's the data on @RonJohnsonWI's chart. Except this data leaves out tens of thousands of border encounters! pic.twitter.com/7X3ykleheD
Still, other immigration experts were not as generous.
"When the data too closely matches what you want, you should reexamine it again. This is just a mistake that's only possible if you already knew that obviously crossings exploded after Biden was elected," wrote David Bier, an immigration researcher at the Cato Institute.
When the data too closely matches what you want, you should reexamine it again. This is just a mistake that's only possible if you already knew that obviously crossings exploded after Biden was elected. https://t.co/MhNTf5CZC8— David Bier (@David_J_Bier) May 13, 2021