The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

Some of us Midwesterners think maybe Amy Klobuchar would do OK as president


At the Minnesota State Fair, it’s pretty easy to meet our elected officials and candidates for office. Instead of giving auditorium speeches, they tend to stand around talking to small groups of fairgoers or wandering the streets between the food stands. It’s not hard to catch up with several in one afternoon. At the fair, Senator Amy Klobuchar can regularly be found at her own little venue: a miniature blue house with an open porch located just in front of Bob’s Snake Zoo. People stop by and say hello or pose for a picture. There’s no helicopter with her name on it, no grandiosity; it just seems so normal. And many of us are longing for that right now.

Amy Klobuchar should run for president.

It may not be what she wants to do — who wants to spend months being subjected to vile insults? — but it is what our nation needs. Within a party that fell to Donald Trump because it lost its sense of what works in the swath of territory between Pennsylvania and the Dakotas, she is the best hope. In the midterms she not only won in urban areas but in many rural parts of Minnesota.

Klobuchar is strong, she’s smart, and she’s experienced, but the same can be said of many other potential candidates. What distinguishes her from Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, and most of her other potential primary opponents is almost ineffable, but it comes down to this: she is not enveloped in a shining cloak of ambition.

And that may be the greatest qualification of all in the face of an incumbent who is little more than that cloak.{mosads}

Many of her potential opponents certainly boast a harder edge and more direct rebukes to the Trump agenda. Among the women, Harris and Kirsten Gillibrand are running well to Klobuchar’s left. But like Hillary Clinton before them, they are prone to drop too easily into the “coastal elite” category in the minds of too many voters.

Klobuchar’s personality and positions line up more directly with the last president who won as a Democrat, Barack Obama. Like Klobuchar, he came across as a reasonable Midwesterner, calm in the face of crossfire and quick to talk about solving problems rather than the demons on the other side of the political line. While Republicans and Fox News were quick to describe him as an extremist, the description never really fit. Even his hallmark achievement, the Affordable Care Act, was a moderate reform whose structure was defined within the Heritage Foundation and test-run by Mitt Romney as governor of Massachusetts.

That kind of low-drama reasonableness is back in style, a backlash to the backlash. A key lesson of the midterm elections is that most of the Democrats who succeeded won through pragmatic discussion of issues like health care rather than promises of broad systemic change. 2016 was a “change” election; the next one will be about a return to normalcy after the exhausting roller-coaster ride that has been the Trump era, leaving us longing for competence and civility. Democrats failed in 2016 because they fought the last war. They should not make that mistake again.

The image many Americans have of Klobuchar is an emblematic one: they recall her exchange with Justice Brett Kavanaugh at the dramatic second phase of his confirmation hearing. Kavanaugh approached the exchange in full Trump mode. When Klobuchar asked him if he ever drank so much that he “didn’t remember what happened the night before or part of what happened.” Kavanaugh responded by belligerently throwing the question back at her: “I don’t know, have you?”

America cringed, but Klobuchar did not. Like the prosecutor she once was, she simply restated the question and forged on. After a break, Kavanaugh apologized, which is a rare event with Trump and his followers.

While in that moment Kavanaugh was really only a Junior Varsity Trump, it was a window into how Klobuchar would react to the flurry of bravado and put-downs the Democratic challenger will inevitably face. And for those of us who are looking for hope, it was thrilling. Not just for the steely determination, but for the restraint; Senator Klobuchar maintained her dignity, won the exchange, but did not respond in kind.

If nothing else, a Klobuchar presidency would bring us four to eight years of Rachel Dratch playing her on Saturday Night Live. And if Americans can forge a bipartisan consensus on the value of anything, it should be that.

Mark Osler is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law at the University of St. Thomas, Minneapolis, Minn.

Tags Amy Klobuchar Amy Klobuchar Barack Obama Cory Booker Donald Trump Donald Trump Hillary Clinton Kirsten Gillibrand Mitt Romney Politics of the United States

Copyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

More Campaign News

See All
See all Hill.TV See all Video

Most Popular

Load more


See all Video