4 ways Hillary looms over the 2020 race

Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonHillary Clinton slams Trump rally: 'The time has come again' to fight for democracy Trump blasts minority Democrats, rally crowd chants 'send her back' The Memo: Democrats debate Trump response – 'Being righteous and losing sucks' MORE will play a role in the 2020 presidential campaign, but not in the way you think.

Let’s face it: Hillary’s presence — dare I say omnipresence — is written all over this race. Let’s look at the four ways that Hillary is already dominating the discussion around 2020.

Likeability

ADVERTISEMENT

Look no further than the ongoing smoldering cold war between progressives and the media about how much media outlets should be focused on whether candidates are viewed as “likeable.”

The subtext here being that for many, particularly many women voters, “likeability” seems like a convenient way to judge women candidates for their boldness or confidence. Hillary blazed that trail in 2008 and 2016 facing headlines that seemed fixated over whether she was too muscular and masculine in her policy chops or too sensitive when the chips were down after a defeat in the Iowa caucus.

She was even on the receiving end of a quip from her primary opponent in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama called her “likeable enough” on the debate stage. Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenNew CDC overdose estimates are nothing to celebrate 2020 Democrats react to 'send her back' chants at Trump rally Democratic Houston councilwoman announces Senate bid MORE (D-Mass.) was the first of the women candidates this go around to receive the “likeability” treatment. Now it’s Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean Klobuchar2020 Democrats react to 'send her back' chants at Trump rally Democrats warm to idea of studying reparations Bullock makes CNN debate stage MORE’s (D-Minn.) turn in the barrel, against the backdrop of reports of her alleged rough and seemingly abusive treatment of staff over the last decade as a Senator.

Boom in women candidates

Now move on to the boom in women candidates altogether. It’s obvious with four leading female Sens. — Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth Gillibrand2020 Democrats react to 'send her back' chants at Trump rally First responder calls senators blocking 9/11 victim funding 'a--holes' Democrats warm to idea of studying reparations MORE (D-.N.Y.), Kamala HarrisKamala Devi Harris2020 Democrats react to 'send her back' chants at Trump rally Biden's health care gaffe shows he's not ready for prime time The Hill's Morning Report - Trump seizes House impeachment vote to rally GOP MORE (D- Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) — and Rep. Tulsi GabbardTulsi GabbardBullock makes CNN debate stage Democrats ask Labor Department to investigate Amazon warehouses Jack Dorsey maxes out donations to Tulsi Gabbard presidential bid MORE all declared as candidates. But it really started in the midterm election cycle with the record number of both women candidates and victors in the 2018 midterms.

The backlash against the election of President TrumpDonald John TrumpAmash responds to 'Send her back' chants at Trump rally: 'This is how history's worst episodes begin' McConnell: Trump 'on to something' with attacks on Dem congresswomen Trump blasts 'corrupt' Puerto Rico's leaders amid political crisis MORE which spawned the women’s march has a direct line to Hillary Clinton, given her perceived mistreatment by media and, frankly, voters in 2016.  

The language

The language and style of the candidates this time around — again, Hillary inspired. Kamala Harris’ “for the people” frame which delves into being a fighter for working people sounds very similar to some Hillary Clinton riffs about people deserving “a chance and a champion” in 2016.

The bold feminism of Gillibrand is directly descended from the fight of Hillary Clinton’s adult life dating back to her time as first lady when she redefined the role. Even President Trump got in on the act last week apparently debuting one of his new catchphrases that was essentially a dead pull from Hillary’s “stronger together” campaign platform.

The mistakes

And then, of course, the mistakes of Hillary. Everyone’s favorite hobby horse. We all know the time-honored tradition of blaming the losing candidate and their campaign for making every misstep in the book. And as a Hillary 2016 alum, let me just say, we know. Plenty of black marks from 2016 on the political resume of Hillary Clinton — let’s go through them.

We were wrong to spend any effort trying to steal Arizona, Utah or chasing any other “purple” pipe dreams. We should have spent more time and effort winning over traditional Democratic constituencies like African-American voters and less trying to flip queasy Republicans who held their nose to vote for Trump. She should have apologized harder about the emails (I guess). And, obviously, we should have spent more time and resources in the upper Midwest — Michigan and Wisconsin namely. Hillary’s perceived strategic mistakes against Trump.

Let’s stay on that last one for a moment. Losing ground to Trump in the upper Midwest. This has become a convenient place for 2020 Democrats to get their jab in to Hillary Clinton. First it was Julian Castro who, in the lead up, to jumping into the field talked to CBS about the need for “more focus in certain states” from the Hillary 2016 campaign. And then last weekend, when Amy Klobuchar announced her run from snowy Boom Island, Minnesota, she made a point to underscore that she wouldn’t forget about the upper Midwest.

As I said on CNN recently when asked to respond to Sen. Klobuchar’s criticism, she and all of the candidates should do a better job this time around across the board than we did last time around. They should absolutely learn from Hillary’s mistakes — that’s the whole idea of progress.

But, as I have also said, they should thank Hillary Clinton: for the 66 million plus cracks she put in the invisible ceiling for women candidates seeking to make history that come after her; for taking slings and arrows as secretary of state during the Benghazi affair; and the sideshow of a hearing that she endured and for inspiring young women, who are now the engine of the progressive movement, to run for office on her shoulders.  

Hillary Clinton may not be on the ballot this time around but she has already influenced this race for the 2020 Democratic nomination and she will be a factor in whoever Democrats chose to counter Donald Trump in roughly 20 months from now. Count me as one who believes that Democratic candidates and the Democratic primary process will be better this time around for Hillary’s still outsized influence.

Joel Payne is a former Hillary for America senior aide and vice president of Corporate communications, MWWPR, which is a public relations firm.