4 ways Hillary looms over the 2020 race

Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham ClintonWarren policy ideas show signs of paying off Biden at campaign kickoff event: I don't have to be 'angry' to win Top Dem: Trump helps GOP erase enthusiasm gap; Ohio a big problem MORE will play a role in the 2020 presidential campaign, but not in the way you think.

Let’s face it: Hillary’s presence — dare I say omnipresence — is written all over this race. Let’s look at the four ways that Hillary is already dominating the discussion around 2020.

Likeability

ADVERTISEMENT

Look no further than the ongoing smoldering cold war between progressives and the media about how much media outlets should be focused on whether candidates are viewed as “likeable.”

The subtext here being that for many, particularly many women voters, “likeability” seems like a convenient way to judge women candidates for their boldness or confidence. Hillary blazed that trail in 2008 and 2016 facing headlines that seemed fixated over whether she was too muscular and masculine in her policy chops or too sensitive when the chips were down after a defeat in the Iowa caucus.

She was even on the receiving end of a quip from her primary opponent in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama called her “likeable enough” on the debate stage. Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenHere are the potential candidates still eyeing 2020 bids Sanders unveils education plan that would ban for-profit charter schools Warren policy ideas show signs of paying off MORE (D-Mass.) was the first of the women candidates this go around to receive the “likeability” treatment. Now it’s Sen. Amy KlobucharAmy Jean KlobucharInslee gives public option first test in Washington state Momentum builds behind push to pass laws enshrining abortion rights Poll: Biden is only Dem candidate that beats Trump outside of margin of error MORE’s (D-Minn.) turn in the barrel, against the backdrop of reports of her alleged rough and seemingly abusive treatment of staff over the last decade as a Senator.

Boom in women candidates

Now move on to the boom in women candidates altogether. It’s obvious with four leading female Sens. — Kirsten GillibrandKirsten Elizabeth GillibrandOvernight Health Care — Presented by Campaign for Accountability — Momentum builds for federal laws enshrining abortion rights | Missouri lawmakers approve bill banning abortions at 8 weeks | Warren unveils plan to protect abortion rights 2020 Dem Seth Moulton calls for expanding cannabis access for veterans Momentum builds behind push to pass laws enshrining abortion rights MORE (D-.N.Y.), Kamala HarrisKamala Devi HarrisHere are the potential candidates still eyeing 2020 bids Warren policy ideas show signs of paying off Hillicon Valley: Florida county that backed Trump was one of two hacked by Russians | Sandberg pushes back on calls to break up Facebook | Conservative groups ask WH to end Amazon talks over Pentagon contract MORE (D- Calif.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) — and Rep. Tulsi GabbardTulsi GabbardMomentum builds behind push to pass laws enshrining abortion rights Poll: Biden is only Dem candidate that beats Trump outside of margin of error Gabbard: US must not go to war with Iran MORE all declared as candidates. But it really started in the midterm election cycle with the record number of both women candidates and victors in the 2018 midterms.

The backlash against the election of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump calls for Republicans to be 'united' on abortion Tlaib calls on Amash to join impeachment resolution Facebook temporarily suspended conservative commentator Candace Owens MORE which spawned the women’s march has a direct line to Hillary Clinton, given her perceived mistreatment by media and, frankly, voters in 2016.  

The language

The language and style of the candidates this time around — again, Hillary inspired. Kamala Harris’ “for the people” frame which delves into being a fighter for working people sounds very similar to some Hillary Clinton riffs about people deserving “a chance and a champion” in 2016.

The bold feminism of Gillibrand is directly descended from the fight of Hillary Clinton’s adult life dating back to her time as first lady when she redefined the role. Even President Trump got in on the act last week apparently debuting one of his new catchphrases that was essentially a dead pull from Hillary’s “stronger together” campaign platform.

The mistakes

And then, of course, the mistakes of Hillary. Everyone’s favorite hobby horse. We all know the time-honored tradition of blaming the losing candidate and their campaign for making every misstep in the book. And as a Hillary 2016 alum, let me just say, we know. Plenty of black marks from 2016 on the political resume of Hillary Clinton — let’s go through them.

We were wrong to spend any effort trying to steal Arizona, Utah or chasing any other “purple” pipe dreams. We should have spent more time and effort winning over traditional Democratic constituencies like African-American voters and less trying to flip queasy Republicans who held their nose to vote for Trump. She should have apologized harder about the emails (I guess). And, obviously, we should have spent more time and resources in the upper Midwest — Michigan and Wisconsin namely. Hillary’s perceived strategic mistakes against Trump.

Let’s stay on that last one for a moment. Losing ground to Trump in the upper Midwest. This has become a convenient place for 2020 Democrats to get their jab in to Hillary Clinton. First it was Julian Castro who, in the lead up, to jumping into the field talked to CBS about the need for “more focus in certain states” from the Hillary 2016 campaign. And then last weekend, when Amy Klobuchar announced her run from snowy Boom Island, Minnesota, she made a point to underscore that she wouldn’t forget about the upper Midwest.

As I said on CNN recently when asked to respond to Sen. Klobuchar’s criticism, she and all of the candidates should do a better job this time around across the board than we did last time around. They should absolutely learn from Hillary’s mistakes — that’s the whole idea of progress.

But, as I have also said, they should thank Hillary Clinton: for the 66 million plus cracks she put in the invisible ceiling for women candidates seeking to make history that come after her; for taking slings and arrows as secretary of state during the Benghazi affair; and the sideshow of a hearing that she endured and for inspiring young women, who are now the engine of the progressive movement, to run for office on her shoulders.  

Hillary Clinton may not be on the ballot this time around but she has already influenced this race for the 2020 Democratic nomination and she will be a factor in whoever Democrats chose to counter Donald Trump in roughly 20 months from now. Count me as one who believes that Democratic candidates and the Democratic primary process will be better this time around for Hillary’s still outsized influence.

Joel Payne is a former Hillary for America senior aide and vice president of Corporate communications, MWWPR, which is a public relations firm.